K&N vs Roto-Fab

[2010reddevil]

Originally Posted by GONIF

In the end , to only real proof is to have an independent test done on the same car on the same day and then back it up with a 1/4 miler run on each. That would be a real world test and settle this once and for all . A brand new K&N and a brand new Rotofab both picked at random from a vendor would be used . And if they do that test I am giving 8 to 5 the Rotofab beats the K&N . Any takers ?

This has already been done minus the track runs. K&N and a few others scored dead last with CAI, ADM and Rotofab scoring towards the top.

[GONIF]

Originally Posted by 2010reddevil

This has already been done minus the track runs. K&N and a few others scored dead last with CAI, ADM and Rotofab scoring towards the top.

Yes I know Ted did the Cold Air induction test back a couple of years ago . I would like to see a new test done with a 1/4 mile test included .

[davisonss]

I'm sorry but to get a 30 rwhp difference between brands of cold air intakes is not reasonable. Only way to account for that big of a difference is installation error resulting in restriction, or much more probable a maf sensor not seated properly and throwing false readings.

Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-N900A using Tapatalk

[vroomapunk]

Originally Posted by adrwhi

And thats the whole reason I wanted to get the tune. To recalibrate the MAF. Look I know it seems I have an answer for everything but trust we tried everything. Yesterday I reinstalled the Roto-fab just for the hell of it. Its just not all that what it is hyped up to be

Its not "hype" its engineering.