Homepage Garage Wiki Register Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > CAMARO6.com General Forums > 6th gen Camaro vs...


BeckyD @ James Martin Chevy


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-27-2016, 09:45 PM   #1
dmj25
 
dmj25's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS A8 Red Garnet NPP
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Odessa
Posts: 223
Raced a C7 Corvette....

Finally got a chance to race a Stingray. I have the 8 speed but didn't ask what the guy driving the Stringay had. We roll raced from 35 to around 100mph. He got me about half a car length. Pretty impressed that my car held its own. From a dig I know it's a drivers race.
dmj25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2016, 09:57 PM   #2
Richard0nee

 
Richard0nee's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 SS M6, NPP
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Hawthorne, CA
Posts: 1,957
Nice, we'll c7's bout 150-200 lbs lighter.

Equal robot-like drivers, the C7 should edge out. In the real world, these two cars is def a drivers race
Richard0nee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2016, 10:04 PM   #3
dmj25
 
dmj25's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS A8 Red Garnet NPP
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Odessa
Posts: 223
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmj25 View Post
Finally got a chance to race a Stingray. I have the 8 speed but didn't ask what the guy driving the Stringay had. We roll raced from 35 to around 100mph. He got me about half a car length. Pretty impressed that my car held its own. From a dig I know it's a drivers race.
Forget to mention this was on a track not street.
dmj25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2016, 10:13 PM   #4
ULTRAZLS1


 
ULTRAZLS1's Avatar
 
Drives: 14 Silverado LTZ Z71, 16 Camaro SS
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Posts: 4,407
Base to base the weight difference is almost 400 lbs. 3300 (3297 IIRC) for base vette and 3685 for the SS.

That's around 4 tenths. Stock record for a stingray is 11.4. SS is 11.9 on stock tires. 11.7 with DR.

Not quite a drivers race all things equal IMO. I consider a drivers race within .2. Of course any race can be a drivers race but that's where I draw the line.
ULTRAZLS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2016, 10:17 PM   #5
dmj25
 
dmj25's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS A8 Red Garnet NPP
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Odessa
Posts: 223
Quote:
Originally Posted by ULTRAZLS1 View Post
Base to base the weight difference is almost 400 lbs. 3300 (3297 IIRC) for base vette and 3685 for the SS.

That's around 4 tenths. Stock record for a stingray is 11.4. SS is 11.9 on stock tires. 11.7 with DR.

Not quite a drivers race all things equal IMO. I consider a drivers race within .2. Of course any race can be a drivers race but that's where I draw the line.
From a roll yes, the Stingray will always edge out the Camaro but from a dig it's only .2 tenths difference if the Camaro has the 8 speed. There are also several Camaro owners getting to 60 in 3.8 sec stock.
dmj25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2016, 10:25 PM   #6
ULTRAZLS1


 
ULTRAZLS1's Avatar
 
Drives: 14 Silverado LTZ Z71, 16 Camaro SS
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Posts: 4,407
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmj25 View Post
From a roll yes, the Stingray will always edge out the Camaro but from a dig it's only .2 tenths difference if the Camaro has the 8 speed. There are also several Camaro owners getting to 60 in 3.8 sec stock.
Just going off established private owner times so far. The stingray has gone 11.4 stock with stock tires. We are at 11.90 right now and I think someone will go 11.8 eventually can't see much more being possible. Granted these are different driver different day and track but when you have the data compiled over a couple years with similar DA as well as the weight difference I would say the difference is about .4.
ULTRAZLS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2016, 10:30 PM   #7
dmj25
 
dmj25's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS A8 Red Garnet NPP
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Odessa
Posts: 223
Quote:
Originally Posted by ULTRAZLS1 View Post
Just going off established private owner times so far. The stingray has gone 11.4 stock with stock tires. We are at 11.90 right now and I think someone will go 11.8 eventually can't see much more being possible. Granted these are different driver different day and track but when you have the data compiled over a couple years with similar DA as well as the weight difference I would say the difference is about .4.
I never thought the day would come where a Camaro SS and Corvette would be so close in performance. Both are amazing machines. Right now is the best time to be a car enthusiast and I hope this is not the last generation to have a v8 given the upcoming mpg laws. So disappointed in the Ford GT.
dmj25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2016, 11:01 PM   #8
ULTRAZLS1


 
ULTRAZLS1's Avatar
 
Drives: 14 Silverado LTZ Z71, 16 Camaro SS
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Posts: 4,407
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmj25 View Post
I never thought the day would come where a Camaro SS and Corvette would be so close in performance. Both are amazing machines. Right now is the best time to be a car enthusiast and I hope this is not the last generation to have a v8 given the upcoming mpg laws. So disappointed in the Ford GT.
For sure. Although from 1998-2002 I would say the Camaro was closer to the corvette than it ever has been before or since. As far as strait line performance. As far as turns and all around performance it is closer now than ever IMO.

Weight difference was about 200lbs and rwhp numbers were slightly in favor of the Camaro from 1998-2002. The Camaro also had solid rear axle which is a bit better for the strip. 12.6 hero time for the c5 vette and 12.8 for the Camaro IIRC.

Whats up with the Ford GT....turbo v6?
ULTRAZLS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2016, 11:05 PM   #9
SuperSound


 
SuperSound's Avatar
 
Drives: '17 Camaro 2SS A8
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Eastern NC
Posts: 5,063
Don't forget if the C7 was an A8, only the Z51 has equal gearing to the SS. A non-Z51 A8 might be very close to what an SS A8 will run.
__________________
Current: '17 2SS Hyper Blue, A8, MRC, NPP
Past: '99 SS Camaro A4, '73 Camaro 383 A3

"Voices in your head are not considered insider information."

3800 Status - 6/16/16 (Built!)
6000 status - 6/29/16 (Delivered!)
SuperSound is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2016, 11:10 PM   #10
dmj25
 
dmj25's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS A8 Red Garnet NPP
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Odessa
Posts: 223
Quote:
Originally Posted by ULTRAZLS1 View Post
For sure. Although from 1998-2002 I would say the Camaro was closer to the corvette than it ever has been before or since. As far as strait line performance. As far as turns and all around performance it is closer now than ever IMO.

Weight difference was about 200lbs and rwhp numbers were slightly in favor of the Camaro from 1998-2002. The Camaro also had solid rear axle which is a bit better for the strip. 12.6 hero time for the c5 vette and 12.8 for the Camaro IIRC.

Whats up with the Ford GT....turbo v6?
Yes the upcoming Ford GT will have a 3.5 liter twin turbo v6 sadly.
dmj25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-27-2016, 11:13 PM   #11
ULTRAZLS1


 
ULTRAZLS1's Avatar
 
Drives: 14 Silverado LTZ Z71, 16 Camaro SS
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Jackson, Michigan
Posts: 4,407
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperSound View Post
Don't forget if the C7 was an A8, only the Z51 has equal gearing to the SS. A non-Z51 A8 might be very close to what an SS A8 will run.
Didn't know that. May be a bit closer to a base car....

Although the z51 package comes with a decent weight penalty. Loaded z51 cars are 34-3450lbs from what ive seen. But then again the 11.4 car was a z51...
ULTRAZLS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2016, 10:05 AM   #12
Tr6
The Dogfather
 
Drives: #1 off the line for a customer. '16
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Andover, KS
Posts: 2,621
The higher the speeds the further C7 will pull on you due to the insane aero it has over our 6th gens. I've done many pulls against C7s (a couple against Kracka here and others not here) and they always ends up about half a car length in front of me and the gap gets further out as the speeds go above 120. From a dig, our cars will always take a head start due to our tires proving a much better traction (weight plus our tires are much better than PSS imo).
__________________
2SS, Garnet Red with Adrenalin red, NPP, MRC M6 coupe
#33 off the line #1 order for Customer.
Build thread HERE!
Story of my delivery HERE!
Tr6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2016, 10:20 AM   #13
SpeedIsLife


 
Drives: Current Camaro-less
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Oregon
Posts: 3,242
Time slips?

Footage from the track?

I'm assuming this was on a track since we don't allow street racing posts
SpeedIsLife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-28-2016, 10:33 AM   #14
Lafourche1

 
Drives: 2019 CLA 450 Mercedes
Join Date: May 2016
Location: South Louisiana
Posts: 1,107
One small point to consider is that there are very well documented incidents where the SS puts down more RWHP than the C7. Small amounts of less than 10 HP, but still real.

That was very common with the LS1 cars. The solid rear axle put more power down than the IRS. It was not uncommon for the F-Bodies to put down 300+RWHP on a dyno pretty much bone stock. The C5s put down in the 280-290 range due to the losses of the IRS.

My SLP Firehawk put down 301RWHP bone stock at 1,500 miles.
__________________
2019 Lunar Blue Metallic Mercedes CLS 450
2021 C43 AMG Mercedes Coupe Metallic Cardinal Red
2014 Lincoln MKT EcoBoost (The Bus)
Lafourche1 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:51 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.