11-12-2012, 11:59 PM | #29 | |
Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,989
|
Quote:
IMO, the Camaro can use some factory upgrades that don't void the warranty. |
|
11-13-2012, 12:26 AM | #30 |
Drives: 2012 Mustang GT, 1998 Cobra Join Date: May 2012
Location: VA
Posts: 278
|
It's going to be interesting to see what Chevy does with the next gen Camaro. I know the ATS is light, but it also doesnt have the engines, heavier duty trans and rear that the camaro will need to keep from breaking parts. All those will add weight. I think the new Camaro is going to be lighter than the current car. But still closer to the current GT500 weight. 3700-3800 pounds. Which will help the car tremendously. The 2015 mustang is still going to be 200-300 pounds lighter across the models i believe. And sales for both have leveled off and are pretty much dead even. The Challenger is just an afterthought.
|
11-13-2012, 01:14 AM | #31 | |
Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,989
|
Quote:
|
|
11-13-2012, 01:26 AM | #32 | |
Account Suspended
Drives: 10' IOM 2SS/RS, 13' GB Shelby GT500 Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Sherwood Park, AB
Posts: 2,180
|
Quote:
Of course that being said I'm not saying they out perform just due to the driver but it's a factor you have to account for. I personally also wouldn't want a Z/28 in this body. Maybe if it weighed what the Mustang does but not the current weight… I don't care how well they can make the Camaro handle, the weight is too much in my opinion for a true track car. Not that the Boss is light enough in my opinion either. Last edited by The IOM Ninja; 11-13-2012 at 01:42 AM. |
|
11-13-2012, 01:37 AM | #33 | |
Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,989
|
Quote:
I think the Camaro's weight is somewhat overblown. The car has proven it can handle well. Now just add around 505 N/A horsepower with even better 1LE suspension, some more ZL1 aero, ZL1 brakes and a Z/28 badge. |
|
11-13-2012, 02:06 AM | #34 | |
Account Suspended
Drives: 10' IOM 2SS/RS, 13' GB Shelby GT500 Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Sherwood Park, AB
Posts: 2,180
|
Quote:
The big thing is, and just my opinion, Chevy made the mistake of making the ZL1 the car with Magnetic Ride Control or more appropriately the only Camaro (as of now). If they wanted a to build a track car which, sorry to burst everyone's bubble, a nearly 2 short ton Supercharged Heat Soaking Camaro isn't. They should have done everything they did with the ZL1, kept the Z28 name like they had originally planned and kept it Naturally Aspirated. I bet the Z28 with the same performance enhancements and a naturally aspirated engine making around 505 Horsepower would do better on the road course and at the drag strip than the ZL1 or at least very similar. Of course that is just my opinion and I understand the need for Chevy to introduce a car that could compete with the GT500. |
|
11-13-2012, 02:08 AM | #35 |
Drives: 2013 A6 GT 5.0 Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 2,909
|
A V6 ATS with auto trans weighs 3450 lbs so if GM really wanted to make the new 6TH gen V8 Camaro around 3500 lbs they could do it. With a 450 hp LT1 and only 3500 lbs the new Camaro could really be a quick car. We just need to hope thats what they do. For comparison my 3400lb 4th gen probably had only 410hp and ran low 12's. The 6th gen could be a factory 11 second car if they get the weight down.
__________________
BLK/BLK 1SS/RS Ordered 11-01-2009 Took delivery 12-22-2009. Heads/cam/converter/bolt ons. SOLD Feb 2015 to fund 6th gen LT1 SS with 8L90E.
|
11-13-2012, 09:49 AM | #36 | |
Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,989
|
Quote:
|
|
11-13-2012, 11:29 AM | #37 | |
Wind Rider
Drives: ZL1 19 White; Jeep 5.7 GC 15 Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Muscat
Posts: 2,059
|
Quote:
__________________
Im not Gray any more !!
|
|
11-13-2012, 11:39 AM | #38 | |
Wind Rider
Drives: ZL1 19 White; Jeep 5.7 GC 15 Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Muscat
Posts: 2,059
|
Quote:
The 5th generation has a killer look for sure and the transformers movie gave it a big push forward. We bought the car because it is a real beast ignoring the cheap interior and some major components that doesnt fit exactly a sports car so we had to spend some cash to improve it. Now the question is did Chevy tried to catch up with ford by launching the 1LE and the ZL1 because it was hard to improve the SS in a full scale?
__________________
Im not Gray any more !!
|
|
11-13-2012, 12:27 PM | #39 |
Drives: 2015 SS 1LE Red Hot, 1970 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Chino, CA
Posts: 6,989
|
I think GM took the lead by adding IRS to the Camaro but failed to capitalize on it. The 1LE is how the SS should have been from the beginning.
|
11-13-2012, 01:19 PM | #40 | |
Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,943
|
Your exactly right, but you also know there are plenty of clues and other vehicles to keep an eye on to help form an idea as to the possible weight and performance of the next gen Camaro. As far as looks/interior...stuff like that. No clue.
Quote:
The ATS V6 is a good performer, claimed at 5.6 seconds to 60. It is a sports sedan...it had better be well engineered. Do you think the V6 Camaro version of that car would really require a beefier drivetrain? Not likely....and if the Camaro has less tech, and less other stuff like sound dampening material, it could possibly weigh a tad less. Now lets look at the current Camaro. The V6 weighs in at around 3,750 lbs. The V8 is around 100+ lbs more than that which includes the beefier drivetrain, brakes, suspension. Now apply that same logic to the next gen Camaro (with the V6 weighing in at around 3,450 lbls just like the V6 ATS does) and you have a V8 Camaro in the 3,500 to 3,600lb range. I think that if a base V8 is even close to 3,700 or higher in the next gen Camaro would be a failure.
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!) |
|
11-13-2012, 01:23 PM | #41 |
Banned
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Sin City
Posts: 697
|
|
11-13-2012, 01:46 PM | #42 | |
Account Suspended
Drives: 10' IOM 2SS/RS, 13' GB Shelby GT500 Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Sherwood Park, AB
Posts: 2,180
|
Quote:
As per the first question: It's a complex question. You could say that Ford is driving the Pony Car market by introducing these high performing cars, while Chevy is also driving the market by introducing their competitors to Fords cars. You could also say that the technology in the ZL1 is pushing Pony Cars ahead quite a bit but you could say the same about the GT500 and the Boss. I don't believe that anyone is truly in the lead, especially because it's usually a toss up between the ZL1 and GT500, but I can certainly say that Ford and Chevy are driving the Pony Car market more significantly that Mopar. |
|
|
|
|
|