Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Phastek Performance
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-05-2011, 04:08 PM   #1
nomadicdogg

 
Drives: '10 2SS/RS Cyber Grey Camaro (sold)
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Western, PA
Posts: 1,737
K and N filter or cold air kit

I picked up a K and N filter for my 2SS. But now Im thinking I should go with a cold air kit. Anyone done this? How much power we talking? gas mileage change? Any thoughts would be great
nomadicdogg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2011, 04:36 PM   #2
MTI Racing Kevin
 
MTI Racing Kevin's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Marietta, GA
Posts: 525
Cold Air Intake

nomadicdogg
I would recommend the cold air intake over just replacing the filter with the K&N. The whole idea of the cold air intake is to get a cooler charge of air while also increasing the amount of air going into the engine. More air, cooler air = more power. Most cold air intakes will increase the HP by about 8 to 15. The other advantage of the cold air intake is when you do your supercharger, camshaft, headers, cnc ported heads, or all the above you are already ahead of the game. Cold air intakes and header systems are typically the first mods done and will compliment any other mods you decide to do.
MTI Racing Kevin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2011, 04:41 PM   #3
AFblueSS
U.S.A.F. Retired
 
AFblueSS's Avatar
 
Drives: Imperial Blue 2010 Camaro 1SS / 6MT
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Pensacola, Florida
Posts: 202
Send a message via Yahoo to AFblueSS
Thumbs up

While I'm saving the money for my Vararam intake kit and other mods, I bought the K&N panel replacement filter. Definitely NOTICEABLE throttle response difference! Worth the $54.00 for sure. I'll give it away to another 5th gen owner when I'm done with it, to pay it forward!
AFblueSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-05-2011, 07:57 PM   #4
nomadicdogg

 
Drives: '10 2SS/RS Cyber Grey Camaro (sold)
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Western, PA
Posts: 1,737
I picked up the filter on ebay for about $25.. couldnt beat the price. But I am debating on the cold air kit also. I dont plan on cams or headers or any supercharging. Im satisfied with what I have, just looking for a bit more without major changes.
the gears I am going to add in will make up the rest of the difference.
I know when I put an exhuast and kandn filter on my suburban I picked up atleast 20HP
could def feel it
nomadicdogg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2011, 12:37 AM   #5
axis
Search Ninja
 
axis's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Black 2SS/RS A6
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Central Ark
Posts: 7,183
Quote:
Originally Posted by nomadicdogg View Post
I picked up the filter on ebay for about $25.. couldnt beat the price. But I am debating on the cold air kit also. I dont plan on cams or headers or any supercharging. Im satisfied with what I have, just looking for a bit more without major changes.
the gears I am going to add in will make up the rest of the difference.
I know when I put an exhuast and kandn filter on my suburban I picked up atleast 20HP
could def feel it
There's a HUGE difference between a Suburban and a Camaro, especially the 5th Gen. GM set them up pretty well from the factory. A aftermarket filter alone will net you nothing in terms of performance and it's iffy as to whether they filter any better than the OEM filter. Exhaust mods from the cats back are just for sound. There's very little if any HP increases from changing a catback. If you're looking for HP, you'll need to go to a CAI. Make sure you research which ones work best as there IS a difference between them. While it may not be massive, it doesn't make sense to pay the same or near the same for a CAI that doesn't perform well. Make sure you look for PROOF, as some manufacturers will spout out numbers that have never been reproduced in the real world. On the exhaust side, HF cats, no cats, and LT's are what make power. Shorties are debateable as to whether they make power or not.
__________________
2010 Black 2SS/RS A6
Halltech CF 102 fed
GPI modded intake manifold
Bo (knows) White ported TB
Kooks LT's/ Dynomax VT
Pfadted (springs/sways)
Dyno tuned by Rhino and GPI

I once parallel parked a train.
axis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2011, 05:07 AM   #6
buelldude
car enthusiasts
 
buelldude's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 2SS
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: virginia
Posts: 708
?

I'm going to put in my 2cents.
I like many others on here will put things on for looks and performance. I went back in time to pull up some stuff out of and old Hot Rod mag (mid 80's), it had the same hp/gains that as it does now- 8-15 for most cars/trucks. So I called someone at a company (names left out for a reason) and they said that both articles were true to the statements that were made. They then said that you get the same gains today. They wouldn't say one way or another that the new CAI systems made a difference. I then talked to a person that has a dyno here in town and they backed it up with they both work great. So its your call if you want to spend the extra money for nice to have items under the hood. I would say if your doing any testing on a dyno, try the drop in filter first.
__________________
<img src=http://www.camaro5.com/forums/album.php?albumid=9196&pictureid=93608 border=0 alt= />
buelldude is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2011, 05:25 AM   #7
FEN

 
FEN's Avatar
 
Drives: BLACK 2SS/RS
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,092
The drop in filter has almost no HP gain....same thing for cat back exhausts.If you want HP you need a good CAI,ADM scoop,LT's and HF cats.....and a tune.
__________________
CCW polished 505a's
Front 20x10 w/275/40/20's
Rear 20x11.5 w/305/35/20's
Eibach 1" Pro Spring Kit
Factory GFX
MPD1 spoiler
painted bowties
15% tint
FEN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2011, 06:45 AM   #8
nomadicdogg

 
Drives: '10 2SS/RS Cyber Grey Camaro (sold)
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Western, PA
Posts: 1,737
Honestly I have no desire to change the exhaust header back. if I do anything to the exhaust it would be cat back and only for the sound. However Im mostly satisfied with the sound to be honest.
As for the cold air intake, I know its a much better set up vs just the filter, but not sure i can justify $300-$400 for 10 HP at most. I wanted to see if anyone has a noticable difference in milage or power with just the drop in filter.
nomadicdogg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2011, 06:46 AM   #9
nomadicdogg

 
Drives: '10 2SS/RS Cyber Grey Camaro (sold)
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Western, PA
Posts: 1,737
Quote:
Originally Posted by buelldude View Post
I'm going to put in my 2cents.
I like many others on here will put things on for looks and performance. I went back in time to pull up some stuff out of and old Hot Rod mag (mid 80's), it had the same hp/gains that as it does now- 8-15 for most cars/trucks. So I called someone at a company (names left out for a reason) and they said that both articles were true to the statements that were made. They then said that you get the same gains today. They wouldn't say one way or another that the new CAI systems made a difference. I then talked to a person that has a dyno here in town and they backed it up with they both work great. So its your call if you want to spend the extra money for nice to have items under the hood. I would say if your doing any testing on a dyno, try the drop in filter first.
Thanks for the input. I wish I had access to a dyno. that would make it much easier.
nomadicdogg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2011, 06:49 AM   #10
nomadicdogg

 
Drives: '10 2SS/RS Cyber Grey Camaro (sold)
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Western, PA
Posts: 1,737
Quote:
Originally Posted by axis View Post
There's a HUGE difference between a Suburban and a Camaro, especially the 5th Gen. GM set them up pretty well from the factory. A aftermarket filter alone will net you nothing in terms of performance and it's iffy as to whether they filter any better than the OEM filter. Exhaust mods from the cats back are just for sound. There's very little if any HP increases from changing a catback. If you're looking for HP, you'll need to go to a CAI. Make sure you research which ones work best as there IS a difference between them. While it may not be massive, it doesn't make sense to pay the same or near the same for a CAI that doesn't perform well. Make sure you look for PROOF, as some manufacturers will spout out numbers that have never been reproduced in the real world. On the exhaust side, HF cats, no cats, and LT's are what make power. Shorties are debateable as to whether they make power or not.
I under no circumstances was comparing a 2007 suburban with a 5.3 to a 2010 camaro. Only stated that the cat back and drop in filter on my truck made a HUGE difference in Mileage, Horsepower and fun factor.
As for the camaro. Im fine with the exhaust sound for the most part. I wouldnt go with headers. factory 426 is pretty fine with me. If I do change the exhaust it would only be to make it a bit louder. I Have no illusions that a drop in filter would be minimal at best. However is it worth $300-$400 to put a cold air intake in for 10-15 HP at best? That to me is debatable
nomadicdogg is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2011, 09:09 AM   #11
FEN

 
FEN's Avatar
 
Drives: BLACK 2SS/RS
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,092
Quote:
Originally Posted by nomadicdogg View Post
As for the cold air intake, I know its a much better set up vs just the filter, but not sure i can justify $300-$400 for 10 HP at most. I wanted to see if anyone has a noticable difference in milage or power with just the drop in filter.
You can get aprox 18HP at the wheels with the Cold Air Ind. CAI and ADM race Scoop. You will also need a washer reservoir relocation kit .....total cost around $550
__________________
CCW polished 505a's
Front 20x10 w/275/40/20's
Rear 20x11.5 w/305/35/20's
Eibach 1" Pro Spring Kit
Factory GFX
MPD1 spoiler
painted bowties
15% tint
FEN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2011, 09:28 AM   #12
ssmike
BL1ZZRD
 
ssmike's Avatar
 
Drives: '16 Camaro 2SS, '20 Equinox Redline
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 7,840
Ted Jannetty tested a K&N filter drop in and netted 0 gain, same as stock! Definatly recommend a cai kit to replace the stock system!
ssmike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2011, 10:38 AM   #13
LadyT_SS
Christina
 
Drives: Red Jewel Tint 1SS
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 171
Keep in mind that a CAI will help you save on gas!
LadyT_SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-06-2011, 10:44 AM   #14
midnighter
Account Suspended
 
Drives: nothing
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: a hole
Posts: 17,906
I have the K&N drop in filter and feel a slight difference in throttle response and maybe a bit louder. I am satisfied with what the stock SS has to offer powerwise.
midnighter is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
?? BEST PRICE ON CAI COLD AIR KIT FOR 6.2?? dcoates V8 Bolt-Ons & Tunes 8 05-10-2010 12:34 PM
Scrming's Air Intake Experiment - Part II scrming Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 94 05-02-2010 03:56 AM
who is selling COLD AIR INDUCTIONS V8 kit? Yellow1lt V8 Bolt-Ons & Tunes 9 01-31-2010 10:45 AM
Fastlane Pipeline Cold Air Intake Fastlane V8 Bolt-Ons & Tunes 24 01-12-2010 09:35 AM
Granatelli Cold Air Kit NickB V8 Bolt-Ons & Tunes 21 12-26-2009 01:08 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.