Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Phastek Performance
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > Camaro ZL1 Forum - ZL1 Specific Topics


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-14-2018, 09:40 PM   #1
curtmgulla
 
Drives: 2014 corvette
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: tn
Posts: 36
Boost a pump adding power ?? What am I missing.

I also posted this on the HP tuners fourm.
Ok car is a 2013 zl1. Upper 2.4 pulley id1050x injectors.. tap headers.. no cats...tr7ix plugs cold air intake.

Ok so before "JMS boost a pump* my AFR was pretty stable. 11.4-11.5. But fuel pressure would go from 65psi to 44 by 6k. Power felt good.. so I thought.....pulled strong.

So I added the "JMS". And here is the "off" part. "Abadzl1* is doing my tune. We expected my AFR to go rich as fuel pressure is now steady at 65. But it stayed 11.5. But Holy Crap!!! the power increase. It pulls so hard and smooth through out the RPM band.

It feels like a completely different car.
How does making fuel pressure steady add hp? What do I not understand. ?
curtmgulla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2018, 06:02 AM   #2
JB'sZL1

 
Drives: 2013 ZL1 and 2019 Ram Laramie
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 1,259
You were running 1050's on solely the stock fuel pump?
JB'sZL1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2018, 06:09 AM   #3
acammer
GPI Sales Consultant
 
acammer's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro 2SS SGM
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Weedsport, NY
Posts: 2,794
Quote:
Originally Posted by curtmgulla View Post
I also posted this on the HP tuners fourm.
Ok car is a 2013 zl1. Upper 2.4 pulley id1050x injectors.. tap headers.. no cats...tr7ix plugs cold air intake.

Ok so before "JMS boost a pump* my AFR was pretty stable. 11.4-11.5. But fuel pressure would go from 65psi to 44 by 6k. Power felt good.. so I thought.....pulled strong.

So I added the "JMS". And here is the "off" part. "Abadzl1* is doing my tune. We expected my AFR to go rich as fuel pressure is now steady at 65. But it stayed 11.5. But Holy Crap!!! the power increase. It pulls so hard and smooth through out the RPM band.

It feels like a completely different car.
How does making fuel pressure steady add hp? What do I not understand. ?
What was the duty cycle like before and after on the injectors?
__________________
GPI Max Package 2.0: Brodix BR7 heads/GPI porting, MAX3 cam, ST2116LSR, BSR Max Lift rockers, LS7 LSXR with 103mm TB, Vararam OTR, Mcleod RXT, G-Force/Strange 9" IRS setup with 4.63 gear. 551whp, 11.1@124mph.
Got a question about a GPI product? Feel free to shoot me a message!
acammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2018, 06:14 AM   #4
03worthy4link
 
Drives: Nil
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Palm beach
Posts: 32
Proper fuel atomization. Injector spray is as designed at the target PSI, same quantity, different quality.
03worthy4link is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2018, 06:35 AM   #5
curtmgulla
 
Drives: 2014 corvette
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: tn
Posts: 36
Yes I was running stock fuel pump but the id1050x... duty cycle before at wide open throttle at 6000 RPM was about 62% now it's 50% but a 10% drop...
curtmgulla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2018, 08:01 AM   #6
acammer
GPI Sales Consultant
 
acammer's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro 2SS SGM
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Weedsport, NY
Posts: 2,794
Quote:
Originally Posted by 03worthy4link View Post
Proper fuel atomization. Injector spray is as designed at the target PSI, same quantity, different quality.
Bingo.
__________________
GPI Max Package 2.0: Brodix BR7 heads/GPI porting, MAX3 cam, ST2116LSR, BSR Max Lift rockers, LS7 LSXR with 103mm TB, Vararam OTR, Mcleod RXT, G-Force/Strange 9" IRS setup with 4.63 gear. 551whp, 11.1@124mph.
Got a question about a GPI product? Feel free to shoot me a message!
acammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2018, 12:16 PM   #7
robrocketanski
 
robrocketanski's Avatar
 
Drives: ZL1 Convertible Auto
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Macomb, Michigan
Posts: 330
I have said for years (to myself mostly) that they run out of fuel and hp not just lean out and melt. That's why people say they may or may not need a fuel pump voltage booster because they just leave a little power on the table.

When I first finished my car I had it on a dyno without the JMS plugged in. The car dynoed fine and power was less than expected at 600 whp. Then the car did 10.8 at 129 which for a convertible is pretty impressive on 600 whp. I am sure it was more once the JMS was plugged in.
__________________
LS3 intake and throttle body, Huron Speed Products twin turbo with 6265 oil less turbos, and 3" header back, JRE smooth cam, ID1300, Fore dual 450lph pumps with MSD voltage booster, A6, 305/45/17 MT Street R
robrocketanski is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2018, 12:27 PM   #8
JB'sZL1

 
Drives: 2013 ZL1 and 2019 Ram Laramie
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Milwaukee
Posts: 1,259
Quote:
Originally Posted by robrocketanski View Post
I have said for years (to myself mostly) that they run out of fuel and hp not just lean out and melt.
Just for argument's sake:

It seems like you're saying it's ok to run on a stock pump with 1050's and 600+ rwhp.

I don't think the op was running 10.8 at 129. Running out of fuel at wot can be catastrophic. I think $1k (BAP) or $4k (Fore pump and rails and 1050's) is cheap insurance to avoid that catastrophic failure. A rebuilt LSA will certainly cost more than that.

Just saying: I would not advise running 1050's w/o an auxiliary fuel system of some level.
JB'sZL1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2018, 12:40 PM   #9
crazydave
 
crazydave's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Camaro ZL1 M6
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Belleville, Il
Posts: 269
Quote:
Originally Posted by curtmgulla View Post
I also posted this on the HP tuners fourm.
Ok car is a 2013 zl1. Upper 2.4 pulley id1050x injectors.. tap headers.. no cats...tr7ix plugs cold air intake.

Ok so before "JMS boost a pump* my AFR was pretty stable. 11.4-11.5. But fuel pressure would go from 65psi to 44 by 6k. Power felt good.. so I thought.....pulled strong.

So I added the "JMS". And here is the "off" part. "Abadzl1* is doing my tune. We expected my AFR to go rich as fuel pressure is now steady at 65. But it stayed 11.5. But Holy Crap!!! the power increase. It pulls so hard and smooth through out the RPM band.

It feels like a completely different car.
How does making fuel pressure steady add hp? What do I not understand. ?
Are you compensating for boost pressure with you FP readings? 44 PSI under 13 psi of boost is really on 31 psi at the injector tip. I can see with increased atomization how you would feel a pwer increase.
__________________
2013 ZL1 CRT M6
__________________________________________________ ____________________________________
Current Mods: Rotofab CAI, Big Gulp, and Res. ATI Superdamper and 10" Lower, DSX FF Sensor, DSX Aux Fuel Pump, ID850s, Kooks 1 7/8" Headers, Forced Induction Interchiller, McLeod RTX Twin disk. DSX Tuned. Running on 20" MT ET Street SS on stock wheels for the strip.

Best 1/4 mile to date:10.81 @130.43 mph w/ 1.61 60'

Just added: Jokerz Stage II blower port and FI Interchillers blower lid spacer.
crazydave is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2018, 01:13 PM   #10
Can'tHave2MuchHP
 
Can'tHave2MuchHP's Avatar
 
Drives: Fast
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,696
Quote:
Originally Posted by 03worthy4link View Post
Proper fuel atomization. Injector spray is as designed at the target PSI, same quantity, different quality.
This. This. This and This. This is a very important point that MANY of us, myself included, forget about from time to time. Pushing the limits of fueling is going to cause problems, even if the car seems to run fine. Fueling parts were all designed to run at a certain PSI. This is why I have a problem with cars running 10% or heaven forbid 18% pulleys on stock injectors, besides the possibility of actually blowing the engine, you just miss out on power and stability of the engine that it will attempt to fix with timing and the like.

ABADZL1 knows what he's talking about, I'd trust him.
Can'tHave2MuchHP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2018, 01:53 PM   #11
curtmgulla
 
Drives: 2014 corvette
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: tn
Posts: 36
All I can say is I am amazed. The car felt like it picked up some power after all the mods... but still felt closer to stock feel it didn't really feel like what I added I got a big benefit from.. and always felt like from 4500 RPM on up the power kind of planed out... it was still pulling but didn't have that hard pull fill to it..... It feels like I added a hundred shot of nitrous to it in all reality no jokes aside the car feels so different.
curtmgulla is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2018, 07:43 PM   #12
ZO6 Bryan

 
ZO6 Bryan's Avatar
 
Drives: 02 Z06, 95 Trans Am, 2012 ZL1
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Southeast
Posts: 1,838
Quote:
Originally Posted by curtmgulla View Post
I also posted this on the HP tuners fourm.
Ok car is a 2013 zl1. Upper 2.4 pulley id1050x injectors.. tap headers.. no cats...tr7ix plugs cold air intake.

Ok so before "JMS boost a pump* my AFR was pretty stable. 11.4-11.5. But fuel pressure would go from 65psi to 44 by 6k. Power felt good.. so I thought.....pulled strong.

So I added the "JMS". And here is the "off" part. "Abadzl1* is doing my tune. We expected my AFR to go rich as fuel pressure is now steady at 65. But it stayed 11.5. But Holy Crap!!! the power increase. It pulls so hard and smooth through out the RPM band.

It feels like a completely different car.
How does making fuel pressure steady add hp? What do I not understand. ?
Quite simple. Better atomization of the fuel at 65 psi
__________________
Bryan 2018 ZL1 M6
ZO6 Bryan is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:50 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.