11-19-2012, 03:05 PM | #1 |
Drives: 2013 zl1 Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: st louis
Posts: 838
|
the 2.35 lpe pulley
I run this on my caddy and was wondering why none of you guys that have modded your car have done it.. ITS WAY cheaper than the lower swap and is a true 15 pounds on its own (it screams). I see some guys doing the 2.55 and then the a 5-10% lower.. seems odd.
|
11-19-2012, 04:16 PM | #2 |
Drives: 2013 ZL1 Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: puyallup
Posts: 543
|
its press on and alot of the guys on here are going the no tune route so far, including myself. as far as the ones building doing lower and uppers i wondered that myself aswell why no one ran the 2.35 upper and 8.6 lower or 9.1 lower (not sure how efficient these blows are past 18 lbs)
__________________
C6Z06 400ci, twin gen 2 promod 88's,th400, Alky car
|
11-19-2012, 06:12 PM | #3 | |
Drives: 2013 ZL1 Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Las Vegas,NV
Posts: 94
|
Quote:
How muck power did it make. Dyno sheets please? |
|
11-19-2012, 06:40 PM | #4 |
|
Did you have to change the injectors?
__________________
|
11-19-2012, 07:53 PM | #5 |
Drives: '21 ZLE A10 Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mechanicsville, VA
Posts: 6,809
|
at 13psi I am at limit with the stockers...15psi has to be an injector upgrade
__________________
'21 ZLE A10 Wild Cherry PDR 2:00.78 VIR Full 10.68@131.69 1.68 60'
'17 ZL1 A10 Mosaic Black PDR/Nav 2:03.08 VIR Full 11.003@129.2 1.75 (sold) '15 Z/28 #325 Black a/c & stereo. 2:10.1 VIR Full (sold) '12 ZL1 A6 Black 10.52@131 1.55 60' 2:13 VIR Full (sold) |
11-20-2012, 02:17 PM | #6 |
Drives: 2013 zl1 Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: st louis
Posts: 838
|
my v makes 577 on stock injectors. auto car, same setup on a manual car should be a hair under 600. 2.35 upper, zr1 cam, c.a.i..
there is NO reason that a pulley only (c.a.i) cant run on stock injectors..I talked to brent at LPE and he told me they have done a couple of cars with 18 pounds but it tends to be to high for 91 octane, which is all they une for up there because thats all they have.. i have 93 around here but i do tune my cars on 91 just encase wife gets junk fuel by accident.. and before anyone brings tuning into it, i agree.. but my v has 41000 miles on it, so i think if it was going to blow up, it would have done it by now..lol i dont have dyno sheets ( i did not even know how much power it made until a few weeks ago, but i have DOZENS of timeslips.. i am doing this mod to the zl1 (just the pulley and c.a.i) and i will post those sheets i guess since its winter i have no other way to see how it stacks up against the caddy. |
11-20-2012, 02:24 PM | #7 |
Drives: ZL1 #1691 Black on black. Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: WNY
Posts: 522
|
I'm doing the no-tune thing also. If(when) I descide to go bigger I can get just the crank pulley and the blower pulley. It will cost less that way and I will already have my SFI rated balancer. The common number I've seen is 700 rwhp with cam,crankshaft and sc pullies, injectors, 102 TB, withor without new heads. I would say that this is the limit of the stock SC.
|
11-20-2012, 02:28 PM | #8 |
Drives: 2013 zl1 Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: st louis
Posts: 838
|
cost less than what? the upper 2.35 makes the same boost as a 2.55 and the 10% lower? The upper pulley swap costs about 300 bucks (including turning the snout down and installing the pulley) while the other way costs over a grand just in parts..
to each there own, i was just wondering why people were doing it this way. |
11-20-2012, 02:39 PM | #9 |
Drives: ZL1 #1691 Black on black. Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: WNY
Posts: 522
|
I meant that it will only have to buy the balancer sc pulley, not the balancer and pulley. When you order a crackshaft pulley kit you get the acc, balancer and sc pullies.
|
11-20-2012, 02:41 PM | #10 |
Drives: ZL1 #1691 Black on black. Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: WNY
Posts: 522
|
I haven't seen anybody offering a no-tune sc pulley.
|
11-20-2012, 02:58 PM | #11 |
Drives: 2013 zl1 Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: st louis
Posts: 838
|
The 2.35 is 26% overdriven. To do a lower with that much overdrive you have to relocate your idlers.. i think.. pretty sure.
|
11-20-2012, 03:02 PM | #12 |
Drives: ZL1 #1691 Black on black. Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: WNY
Posts: 522
|
I'm not sure what % overdrive you can do without the idle relocation. I know the idlers are in the way when you get too big. The 2.35 seems to be a good option. I'm not sure what size I will be going with when I decide to upgrade again.
|
11-20-2012, 07:40 PM | #13 |
Drives: 18 zl1, 17 sierra denali Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Detroit Area
Posts: 471
|
9.1 is the biggest lower you can do without relocation. That's what Ted told me.
|
11-20-2012, 08:21 PM | #14 |
Drives: '21 ZLE A10 Join Date: May 2012
Location: Mechanicsville, VA
Posts: 6,809
|
a 9.55 lower requires the lower idler to be relocated or smaller to clear the ring
__________________
'21 ZLE A10 Wild Cherry PDR 2:00.78 VIR Full 10.68@131.69 1.68 60'
'17 ZL1 A10 Mosaic Black PDR/Nav 2:03.08 VIR Full 11.003@129.2 1.75 (sold) '15 Z/28 #325 Black a/c & stereo. 2:10.1 VIR Full (sold) '12 ZL1 A6 Black 10.52@131 1.55 60' 2:13 VIR Full (sold) |
|
|
|
|