Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Phastek Performance
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Forced Induction - V8


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-23-2015, 09:38 AM   #15
Unreal


 
Drives: 2006 Z06
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 5,712
Pull restrictor and see what it does. No reason you can't make 700rwhp.
__________________
Nick
Corvette Z06 -1200ish rwhp
Unreal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2015, 12:08 PM   #16
RaiderSS
 
RaiderSS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS2 DeadBLK
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 481
Quote:
Originally Posted by Slowhawk View Post
You can't really do 7psi with a YSI. It will make nothing in the midrange. The blower is made to spin 14psi on a stock motor minimum.

Pulley it for more boost.
That's what tuner told me.... Makes sense and he is a proven and reputable tuner

"Let's do the Math

Stock auto 345-60 RWHP tops
Add a converter which will cost Dyno numbers and that Holley mid-rise intake -40-50 rwhp

Leaves you at 310-15 add 7 lbs of very very inefficient boost 420 rwhp should be expected. You will get 20 rwhp per lb of boost if it runs at a normally efficiency level. 10 psi is 200rwhp and so on.

Let's pull the charge pipe and then I can show how much your engine makes.

I have never ever seen a YSI on a stock L99 or even a stock LS3 for that matter. I'm talking STOCK no heads no cam no baby pulley ect....If it worked that's how they would sell it trust me.

They simply don't move enough air at low RPMs. No midrange

You need port velocity"
Attached Images
 
__________________

Last edited by RaiderSS; 01-23-2015 at 12:34 PM.
RaiderSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2015, 12:11 PM   #17
RaiderSS
 
RaiderSS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS2 DeadBLK
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 481
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nitroman28 View Post
Put a smaller pulley on it and wastgate to control boost. Spin it close to it's max rpm and set the wastegate at 12psi.
I may go this route replacing the cold or hot side 50mm blowoff... but he wants to pull the charge tube and install a speed density tune for NA with the throttle body open to the wind to see exactly what the motor is doing to see if I have a bigger issue...

The MAF is no longer used in the tune and the bend at the TB coupler isn't enough to cause this.

Thanks for the suggestions!
__________________
RaiderSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2015, 12:20 PM   #18
RaiderSS
 
RaiderSS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS2 DeadBLK
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 481
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unreal View Post
Pull restrictor and see what it does. No reason you can't make 700rwhp.
Would he need to adjust speed density tune if I removed restrictor?
__________________
RaiderSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2015, 01:38 PM   #19
Unreal


 
Drives: 2006 Z06
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 5,712
YEs, tune would need to be adjusted, as boost will go up and it hasn't been tuned at higher boost.

FYI, AGP made 680-700rwhp on a few stock L99 motors, valve covers and TB never off, just 11-12psi, and one of those cars had a converter. Only reason they didn't go higher was stock tranny doesn't like more than that. Not saying goto turbos, just pointing out a stock l99 can make a solid 650+hp without issues. <500 is just sad.

So turn it up to 13-14psi, make ~700hp and be happy.
__________________
Nick
Corvette Z06 -1200ish rwhp
Unreal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2015, 07:10 PM   #20
376LS3
Eh, that'll happen
 
376LS3's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 1,841
Why would you run speed density? Id have another tuner look at the tune before giving up on a MAF tune. The car is going to run like crap outside of the weather it was tuned in. These MAFs can be scaled to run boost with no issue. Id get rid of the Holly and go back to stock intake.
__________________
2010 Camaro SS LS3 - No Modz
376LS3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2015, 07:36 PM   #21
sick13ss1le
 
sick13ss1le's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 2ss/rs 1le
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 297
regap your spark plugs i know it sounds like something small but i did it and gained 86hp on the dyno....just a thought
sick13ss1le is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2015, 07:42 PM   #22
Nitroman28

 
Nitroman28's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS 416/4L80
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 1,835
Quote:
Originally Posted by RaiderSS View Post
That's what tuner told me.... Makes sense and he is a proven and reputable tuner

"Let's do the Math

Stock auto 345-60 RWHP tops
Add a converter which will cost Dyno numbers and that Holley mid-rise intake -40-50 rwhp

Leaves you at 310-15 add 7 lbs of very very inefficient boost 420 rwhp should be expected. You will get 20 rwhp per lb of boost if it runs at a normally efficiency level. 10 psi is 200rwhp and so on.

Let's pull the charge pipe and then I can show how much your engine makes.

I have never ever seen a YSI on a stock L99 or even a stock LS3 for that matter. I'm talking STOCK no heads no cam no baby pulley ect....If it worked that's how they would sell it trust me.

They simply don't move enough air at low RPMs. No midrange

You need port velocity"

I made those numbers with Cam/Lt/CAI/ TCI 4000 stall unlocked with a L99. If everything with the tune is right you need to spin it faster. I put a F1A on mine and spinning the blower Max rpm with a wategate set at 14lb. Not had it tuned or on a dyno yet. Should get it tuned next week. We will be doing a speed density tune. Waiting on a new meth pump.
Nitroman28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2015, 07:48 PM   #23
Nitroman28

 
Nitroman28's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS 416/4L80
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 1,835
And I would put the stock manifold back on and see what it does.
Nitroman28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2015, 09:34 PM   #24
Pro Stock John
Writer
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 SS / 1967 Camaro
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 7,216
Stock L99 cam, lifters and valvesprings?

In my opinion, your combo is flawed. I've had a YSI + 348 CID LS1 back in the day, but that's not even why I'm saying this (680rwhp, TH400, 9.4@144, 18 psi, 8:1, 5.9@116 1/8th).

~Your combo needs better valve springs, your power band is moved up, and you will or are maybe floating valves. Power might be taking a nose because of that.
~Your combo needs better lifters.
~You could cam it to manage your power band.
~I don't like your intake. That intake moves the power band up. You don't have the right lifters and valvesprings to complement that power band.

Good luck.
__________________
PROJECT HEAVY CHEVY
Camaro Now: Mods for the Masses Part I | Part II
13.15@106 1.95 | 100% Stock
12.37@112 1.85 | + Kooks Headers/Cats + 20" 555R + CAI + BW TB + UDP + Tune
12.06@113 1.70 | + CD 3200 + 18" NT05R + RCR Intake + NE OTR + GPI Tune
11.84@115 1.59 | + 3.91s + Race Star 17x7 Fronts
10.90@125 1.47 | + GPI VVT Cam + BW Ported Heads + CD 3800
Pro Stock John is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2015, 09:35 PM   #25
Pro Stock John
Writer
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 SS / 1967 Camaro
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 7,216
And like Don said, that YSI isn't designed to make 7 lbs of boost, more like 12-15 and they make as much as 25-27 in max applications. Keep in mind maxed out that blower is used for mid 8 second cars.
__________________
PROJECT HEAVY CHEVY
Camaro Now: Mods for the Masses Part I | Part II
13.15@106 1.95 | 100% Stock
12.37@112 1.85 | + Kooks Headers/Cats + 20" 555R + CAI + BW TB + UDP + Tune
12.06@113 1.70 | + CD 3200 + 18" NT05R + RCR Intake + NE OTR + GPI Tune
11.84@115 1.59 | + 3.91s + Race Star 17x7 Fronts
10.90@125 1.47 | + GPI VVT Cam + BW Ported Heads + CD 3800
Pro Stock John is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2015, 09:45 PM   #26
RaiderSS
 
RaiderSS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS2 DeadBLK
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 481
Quote:
Originally Posted by sick13ss1le View Post
regap your spark plugs i know it sounds like something small but i did it and gained 86hp on the dyno....just a thought
They are new plugs, the oem ZR1 plug gapped to .038...

Not getting any misfires but what did you gap yours to?
__________________

Last edited by RaiderSS; 01-23-2015 at 09:58 PM.
RaiderSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2015, 09:56 PM   #27
RaiderSS
 
RaiderSS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS2 DeadBLK
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 481
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pro Stock John View Post
Stock L99 cam, lifters and valvesprings?

In my opinion, your combo is flawed. I've had a YSI + 348 CID LS1 back in the day, but that's not even why I'm saying this (680rwhp, TH400, 9.4@144, 18 psi, 8:1, 5.9@116 1/8th).

~Your combo needs better valve springs, your power band is moved up, and you will or are maybe floating valves. Power might be taking a nose because of that.
~Your combo needs better lifters.
~You could cam it to manage your power band.
~I don't like your intake. That intake moves the power band up. You don't have the right lifters and valvesprings to complement that power band.

Good luck.
I was aware of all these things with the plan keep it turned down till i do cam heads by mid summer but i was still expecting mid 500's

I did find a loose vacum hose tonight, fixed it and will test tomorrow.

My current plan of action is N/A dyno to find out motor health. Then pulley back down to get the head spinning faster and try a waste gate at 9lbs...
__________________
RaiderSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2015, 07:49 AM   #28
grocerygetter
instigator
 
grocerygetter's Avatar
 
Drives: 2020 6.2 Trail Boss, 2022 XC90
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: 72034
Posts: 3,979
Just curious...why did you buy a ysi kit vs a 1500? Ecs stock 1500 kit should make 10 psi on your combo. Or close.
__________________
-John S.
grocerygetter is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.