01-23-2015, 09:38 AM | #15 |
Drives: 2006 Z06 Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 5,712
|
Pull restrictor and see what it does. No reason you can't make 700rwhp.
__________________
Nick
Corvette Z06 -1200ish rwhp |
01-23-2015, 12:08 PM | #16 | |
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS2 DeadBLK Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 481
|
Quote:
"Let's do the Math Stock auto 345-60 RWHP tops Add a converter which will cost Dyno numbers and that Holley mid-rise intake -40-50 rwhp Leaves you at 310-15 add 7 lbs of very very inefficient boost 420 rwhp should be expected. You will get 20 rwhp per lb of boost if it runs at a normally efficiency level. 10 psi is 200rwhp and so on. Let's pull the charge pipe and then I can show how much your engine makes. I have never ever seen a YSI on a stock L99 or even a stock LS3 for that matter. I'm talking STOCK no heads no cam no baby pulley ect....If it worked that's how they would sell it trust me. They simply don't move enough air at low RPMs. No midrange You need port velocity"
__________________
Last edited by RaiderSS; 01-23-2015 at 12:34 PM. |
|
01-23-2015, 12:11 PM | #17 | |
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS2 DeadBLK Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 481
|
Quote:
The MAF is no longer used in the tune and the bend at the TB coupler isn't enough to cause this. Thanks for the suggestions!
__________________
|
|
01-23-2015, 12:20 PM | #18 |
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS2 DeadBLK Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 481
|
Would he need to adjust speed density tune if I removed restrictor?
__________________
|
01-23-2015, 01:38 PM | #19 |
Drives: 2006 Z06 Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 5,712
|
YEs, tune would need to be adjusted, as boost will go up and it hasn't been tuned at higher boost.
FYI, AGP made 680-700rwhp on a few stock L99 motors, valve covers and TB never off, just 11-12psi, and one of those cars had a converter. Only reason they didn't go higher was stock tranny doesn't like more than that. Not saying goto turbos, just pointing out a stock l99 can make a solid 650+hp without issues. <500 is just sad. So turn it up to 13-14psi, make ~700hp and be happy.
__________________
Nick
Corvette Z06 -1200ish rwhp |
01-23-2015, 07:10 PM | #20 |
Eh, that'll happen
Drives: 2010 2SS Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Mesa, Arizona
Posts: 1,841
|
Why would you run speed density? Id have another tuner look at the tune before giving up on a MAF tune. The car is going to run like crap outside of the weather it was tuned in. These MAFs can be scaled to run boost with no issue. Id get rid of the Holly and go back to stock intake.
__________________
2010 Camaro SS LS3 - No Modz
|
01-23-2015, 07:36 PM | #21 |
Drives: 2013 2ss/rs 1le Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 297
|
regap your spark plugs i know it sounds like something small but i did it and gained 86hp on the dyno....just a thought
|
01-23-2015, 07:42 PM | #22 | |
|
Quote:
I made those numbers with Cam/Lt/CAI/ TCI 4000 stall unlocked with a L99. If everything with the tune is right you need to spin it faster. I put a F1A on mine and spinning the blower Max rpm with a wategate set at 14lb. Not had it tuned or on a dyno yet. Should get it tuned next week. We will be doing a speed density tune. Waiting on a new meth pump. |
|
01-23-2015, 07:48 PM | #23 |
|
And I would put the stock manifold back on and see what it does.
|
01-23-2015, 09:34 PM | #24 |
Writer
Drives: 2010 SS / 1967 Camaro Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 7,216
|
Stock L99 cam, lifters and valvesprings?
In my opinion, your combo is flawed. I've had a YSI + 348 CID LS1 back in the day, but that's not even why I'm saying this (680rwhp, TH400, 9.4@144, 18 psi, 8:1, 5.9@116 1/8th). ~Your combo needs better valve springs, your power band is moved up, and you will or are maybe floating valves. Power might be taking a nose because of that. ~Your combo needs better lifters. ~You could cam it to manage your power band. ~I don't like your intake. That intake moves the power band up. You don't have the right lifters and valvesprings to complement that power band. Good luck.
__________________
PROJECT HEAVY CHEVY
Camaro Now: Mods for the Masses Part I | Part II 13.15@106 1.95 | 100% Stock 12.37@112 1.85 | + Kooks Headers/Cats + 20" 555R + CAI + BW TB + UDP + Tune 12.06@113 1.70 | + CD 3200 + 18" NT05R + RCR Intake + NE OTR + GPI Tune 11.84@115 1.59 | + 3.91s + Race Star 17x7 Fronts 10.90@125 1.47 | + GPI VVT Cam + BW Ported Heads + CD 3800 |
01-23-2015, 09:35 PM | #25 |
Writer
Drives: 2010 SS / 1967 Camaro Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 7,216
|
And like Don said, that YSI isn't designed to make 7 lbs of boost, more like 12-15 and they make as much as 25-27 in max applications. Keep in mind maxed out that blower is used for mid 8 second cars.
__________________
PROJECT HEAVY CHEVY
Camaro Now: Mods for the Masses Part I | Part II 13.15@106 1.95 | 100% Stock 12.37@112 1.85 | + Kooks Headers/Cats + 20" 555R + CAI + BW TB + UDP + Tune 12.06@113 1.70 | + CD 3200 + 18" NT05R + RCR Intake + NE OTR + GPI Tune 11.84@115 1.59 | + 3.91s + Race Star 17x7 Fronts 10.90@125 1.47 | + GPI VVT Cam + BW Ported Heads + CD 3800 |
01-23-2015, 09:45 PM | #26 | |
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS2 DeadBLK Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 481
|
Quote:
Not getting any misfires but what did you gap yours to?
__________________
Last edited by RaiderSS; 01-23-2015 at 09:58 PM. |
|
01-23-2015, 09:56 PM | #27 | |
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS2 DeadBLK Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 481
|
Quote:
I did find a loose vacum hose tonight, fixed it and will test tomorrow. My current plan of action is N/A dyno to find out motor health. Then pulley back down to get the head spinning faster and try a waste gate at 9lbs...
__________________
|
|
01-24-2015, 07:49 AM | #28 |
instigator
Drives: 2020 6.2 Trail Boss, 2022 XC90 Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: 72034
Posts: 3,979
|
Just curious...why did you buy a ysi kit vs a 1500? Ecs stock 1500 kit should make 10 psi on your combo. Or close.
__________________
-John S.
|
|
|
|
|