Any tests done on the LSX-R 102mm Intake Manifold - Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums

SSTony · 01-06-2010, 05:20 PM

i hear gains of 14hp but some hp loss at certain rps. Anyone done any dyno tests with this on yet?

rodimus prime · 01-06-2010, 05:30 PM

Unless your going H/C and or stroker its a waste of money. Good money for that.

CrazyTurbo98TA · 01-06-2010, 05:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rodimus prime

Unless your going H/C and or stroker its a waste of money. Good money for that.

agreed!

SGOS252382 · 01-06-2010, 05:38 PM

The Tune Time Performance L99 (heads, cam, bolts ons) only made 4 rwhp (peak) with that intake. The actually lost 8 rwhp in the mid range, and they ended up putting the stock intake back on the car.

Their conclusion was you need a more serious setup to benefit from the intake.

rodimus prime · 01-06-2010, 05:42 PM

But for the same price you could get your manifold ported and get a cam. That would be money well spent.

SSTony · 01-08-2010, 05:39 PM

i agree. that is what i plan on doing down the road.

Quote:

Originally Posted by rodimus prime

But for the same price you could get your manifold ported and get a cam. That would be money well spent.

SC2150 · 01-08-2010, 07:15 PM

Were getting more results porting the stock manifolds than the 102 FAST. Unlike the FAST 90 & 92 that is still unbeatable on a heads/cam build.

brandotron · 01-08-2010, 07:21 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rodimus prime

But for the same price you could get your manifold ported and get a cam. That would be money well spent.

This.

redsap05 · 01-08-2010, 11:28 PM

This intake is a complete waste of money, even if you are heads cam they still get any gains with it. Fast 102= a thousands bucks down the toilet.

axis · 01-09-2010, 12:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by redsap05

This intake is a complete waste of money, even if you are heads cam they still get any gains with it. Fast 102= a thousands bucks down the toilet.

The FI'd guys will love it though.

Jason 98 TA · 01-10-2010, 01:07 PM

I had better luck with my TSP ported LS3 intake over the Ported & out of the box FAST 102mm ls3 intake. Search my name & you'll find all my engine dyno data.

SC2150 · 01-15-2010, 06:06 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jason 98 TA

I had better luck with my TSP ported LS3 intake over the Ported & out of the box FAST 102mm ls3 intake. Search my name & you'll find all my engine dyno data.

Would agree, and ALOT less$$

01-06-2010, 05:20 PM	#1
SSTony Drives: SS Camaro Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Piscataway NJ Posts: 1,782 View My Garage	Any tests done on the LSX-R 102mm Intake Manifold i hear gains of 14hp but some hp loss at certain rps. Anyone done any dyno tests with this on yet? __________________

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
FAST LSxr 102mm intake showed up today!	camaro1	Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons	36	04-19-2011 03:54 PM
FAST 102mm LS3 Intake Manifold $825 SHIPPED!!!	Rich D	V8 Bolt-Ons & Tunes	0	11-19-2009 10:14 AM
F.A.S.T LS3 102mm Intake Manifold Sale @ VRE	DetroitMuscle2010	V8 Bolt-Ons & Tunes	0	09-23-2009 01:18 PM
LS9 SC old news. Here comes the LSX. 850HP, 840 lb-ft of Torgue	13F20	5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions	15	09-22-2008 04:35 PM

01-06-2010, 05:30 PM	#2
rodimus prime Account Suspended Drives: Cargo van. Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Metal Metal Land Posts: 1,247	Unless your going H/C and or stroker its a waste of money. Good money for that.

01-06-2010, 05:38 PM	#4
SGOS252382 Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Mar 2008 Location: S.W. Florida Posts: 6,294	The Tune Time Performance L99 (heads, cam, bolts ons) only made 4 rwhp (peak) with that intake. The actually lost 8 rwhp in the mid range, and they ended up putting the stock intake back on the car. Their conclusion was you need a more serious setup to benefit from the intake.

01-06-2010, 05:42 PM	#5
rodimus prime Account Suspended Drives: Cargo van. Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Metal Metal Land Posts: 1,247	But for the same price you could get your manifold ported and get a cam. That would be money well spent.

01-08-2010, 07:15 PM	#7
SC2150 Account Suspended Drives: 2012 Camaro RS, RX supercharged Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Bradenton, FL Posts: 6,063	Were getting more results porting the stock manifolds than the 102 FAST. Unlike the FAST 90 & 92 that is still unbeatable on a heads/cam build.

01-08-2010, 11:28 PM	#9
redsap05 Drives: 2005 pontiac gto Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: akron oh Posts: 174	This intake is a complete waste of money, even if you are heads cam they still get any gains with it. Fast 102= a thousands bucks down the toilet.

01-10-2010, 01:07 PM	#11
Jason 98 TA Drives: Camaro Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Texas Posts: 1,669	I had better luck with my TSP ported LS3 intake over the Ported & out of the box FAST 102mm ls3 intake. Search my name & you'll find all my engine dyno data.