05-24-2012, 04:14 PM | #43 | ||
Banned
Drives: Chevrolet's, Ford's and one Jeep Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Detroit
Posts: 42
|
Quote:
Quote:
No offense, but this is total bullsh*t. If you think factory paint is anywhere close to being better than a quality paint job then you know nothing about GOOD paint. The only way it will diminishes the value of the car is if you do a color change or its a sh*t job which happens A TON. If its a rare car, then yes it can pending the particular model. Factory paint is nothing but orange peal and a quarter of the time does not match. A good quality paint job from someone that preps properly and can actually lay paint down will look 50X better (if you know what your looking at. It seems you don't because you think orange peal looks good apparently) and no over-spray is no issue if you no what precautions to take including underneath the car AND it will be 20x more durable. At least it is when I do it. & yes I do this for a living. My (MY) company has been doing it now for 31 years for individuals (Some car collectors with muilti million dollar collections) as well as corporate race teams/companies. and FYI 5th gens have some of the worst paint I have seen. I have re-painted many of my customers cars bumpers, QP's and hoods because there NOT EVEN close to matching. Absolutely embarrassing for a 30k+ car. |
||
05-24-2012, 04:54 PM | #44 |
Drives: 2012 2SS TF3, 1971 Chevelle Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Pittsburgh, Pa
Posts: 840
|
Chevy Paint jobs. Quality, Job 2. Or 3. Or maybe 4....could be 5.
This is my 2012 with 1,500 miles of clear, dry, pleasure use driving only on paved roads. Never rolled a foot in rain, as a matter of fact, a rain drop has never been so blessed a to touch my car. Now, the interesting thing about this is that the right front fender lip is chipping, the left is not. The left rear quarter panel as pictured is chipping, the right is not. Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2 |
05-24-2012, 05:32 PM | #45 |
I'll be back...
Drives: Subaru, HD Road Glide Special Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 3,036
|
What panel is that first pic?
The RH side of a car always takes more damage because of the shoulder/curb-side gravel and sand collections from drainage off the road.
__________________
Bye bye, Bumblebee!
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |
05-24-2012, 06:01 PM | #46 |
Drives: Jeep Join Date: May 2011
Location: Tx
Posts: 269
|
|
05-24-2012, 06:49 PM | #47 | |
Drives: 2012 2SS TF3, 1971 Chevelle Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Pittsburgh, Pa
Posts: 840
|
Quote:
The stuff by the gills sort of breaks your rule of right hand damage. And trust me, the cars not been near the berm, not seen any gravel, nor any sand in Beaver County Pa. This is good old black top-soil country. Just tonight I inspected the 2011 Lexus is250C, the 99 F-350, the 05 Dodge Ram, the 04 Grand Cherokee, the 04 Blazer, and the 200,000 mile 00 Toyota Corolla. The new Camaro is by far the most damaged in the fender lip area. So my brand new car wins the award of the most jacked up paint of the family fleet. Even my wife's 2011 Malibu does not share this issue. Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using Tapatalk 2 |
|
05-25-2012, 07:41 AM | #48 | |
Drives: . Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 1,012
|
Quote:
|
|
05-25-2012, 08:03 AM | #49 |
Banned
Drives: various Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 66
|
I knew I'd get a painter on here pounding his chest....
|
05-25-2012, 09:03 AM | #50 | |
Drives: 66 Chevelle 8:02 @174 Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 195
|
Quote:
I've done quite a few engines on unmodded 5.0's in mustangs and f150's. I've also rebuilt a lot of mt-82's even though know it alls on the Internet say there's no issues with them. |
|
05-25-2012, 11:17 AM | #51 |
Banned
Drives: Chevrolet's, Ford's and one Jeep Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Detroit
Posts: 42
|
|
05-25-2012, 12:30 PM | #52 |
Banned
Drives: various Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Florida
Posts: 66
|
The grammar makes that quote above laughably ironic... Whenever you call someone stupid and/or ignorant, it's always best to make sure the sentence could get past your 3rd grade teacher.
I'm in the business too dude.. We just have different opinions. I never said factory paint didn't have peel and issues, I'm just looking further down the road. |
05-25-2012, 12:44 PM | #53 | |
Drives: Jeep Join Date: May 2011
Location: Tx
Posts: 269
|
Quote:
I believe there were issues with the early MT-82s, but Ford warranteed them. I've still never heard of a case of an unmodded 5.0 blowing the #8 cylinder, much less one blowing and Ford refusing to warrantee it. |
|
05-25-2012, 12:49 PM | #54 |
Account Suspended
Drives: nothing Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: a hole
Posts: 17,906
|
My first car when I was 16 was a brand new 1989 Mustang GT 5.0 manual. This was one of the funnest cars I have ever driven. When the new 5.0 came out I was holding my chair tight to not trade.
|
05-25-2012, 01:05 PM | #55 |
Banned
Drives: 2006 Mustang GT Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South Louisiana
Posts: 522
|
My oldest son (24) just traded in a 2010 Dodge Caliber for a 2013 Mustangt 5.0
Awesome car, went do a little spirited driving in it last night,really quick car and the clutch has a good feel to it. |
05-25-2012, 01:25 PM | #56 | |
Drives: 66 Chevelle 8:02 @174 Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 195
|
Quote:
Yes I work for Ford, I've had a few with #8 cylinder problems totally stock. The mt-82's are hit or miss, depends on the customer we put the same parts back in them nothing new or updated. My dealer warranties almost everything, the only time it's iffy is is Ford wants to send an inspector or field service engineer out but most of them are clueless anyways so you can just show them a part that's failed out of a totally different vehicle and they'll just take pics of it and give you an approval. |
|
|
|