05-22-2008, 11:30 PM | #85 |
Go Rays!
Drives: 03 Trailblazer Join Date: May 2007
Location: St Pete, Florida
Posts: 2,533
|
Haha! That's classic!
|
05-22-2008, 11:52 PM | #86 |
E.B.A.H.
Drives: you wild... Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In the happy padded room wearing a jacket that makes me hug myself...
Posts: 18,421
|
They've been calling us fan boys for months now.
|
05-22-2008, 11:59 PM | #87 |
Drives: 2018 Camaro 2SS 1LE Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 307
|
Hey guys,
Look carefully at the rear quarter panel of the V6 car. There is a reddish orange reflection. What car is that next to it? Is it a red (or orange) Camaro? Judging from the crease in the panel of the reddish car, it could even be a Challenger. |
05-23-2008, 12:39 AM | #88 | |
Camaro Deprived
Drives: 78 Camaro, 00 Tahoe, 10 Cobalt Join Date: May 2008
Location: Kaneohe, HI
Posts: 580
|
Quote:
edit: heck, i may be wrong too. the rest of the tire is probably cut of by the crease in the door panel? who knows. |
|
05-23-2008, 01:11 AM | #89 |
Drives: 1998 Pontiac Firebird Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Newark, NJ
Posts: 88
|
Thanks for the photos, these are awesome!! One thing about the car though, it only has one hood air shock to hold the hood up? Looks weird. The 4th Gens have two, one on each side. I'm really going V8 now though, the Direct injection LLT gets only 17/26 economy, thats no better than the LS3:
CTS: Powertrains and Performance The 2008 Cadillac CTS is available with one of two V6 engines. Standard power comes from last year's optional 3.6-liter V6 generating 258 hp and 252 pound-feet of torque, while the available new 3.6-liter direct injection (DI) V6 puts out 304 hp and 273 lb-ft of torque. In performance testing, this engine produced a 0-60-mph time of 6.5 seconds. A six-speed manual transmission is standard with the base engine, and a six-speed automatic is available. The DI engine has the automatic as standard and the manual as optional. The CTS is offered in both rear-wheel and all-wheel-drive configurations. Note that all-wheel-drive models come only with the 258-horse V6 and six-speed automatic. Both engines get virtually the same gas mileage, with 18 mpg city and 26 mpg highway for the base engine and 17/26 mpg for the DI engine. http://www.edmunds.com/cadillac/cts/2008/review.html Chevy Corvette: Powertrains and Performance Both the base coupe and convertible Corvettes feature a 6.2-liter V8 that makes an impressive 430 hp and 424 pound-feet of torque. An optional performance exhaust adds another 6 hp. The Z06 boasts an exotic-class 505 hp and 470 lb-ft from its 7.0-liter V8. All Corvettes have a six-speed manual gearbox as standard, while a six-speed paddle-shift automatic is a no-cost option for the base coupe and convertible. The manual gearbox features new linkage for more positive action while the automatic has been recalibrated to furnish quicker response to the paddle shifters. Regardless of which Corvette you choose, you'll get stunning performance. We spurred the base Corvette coupe from zero to 60 mph in just 4.5 seconds en route to a blistering 12.8-second quarter-mile at 114.8 mph, and Chevrolet claims that it won't stop until it hits 190 mph. Fuel economy is relatively impressive too, with 2008 EPA estimates of 16 mpg city/26 mpg highway for a manual-transmission Corvette. The Z06 is even quicker -- and at 15 mpg city/24 highway, there's only a slight penalty at the pump. http://www.edmunds.com/chevrolet/cor...08/review.html
__________________
Last edited by Dark Eric; 05-23-2008 at 01:26 AM. |
05-23-2008, 01:25 AM | #90 |
I'm missing a bar between the two shocks...
First thing to order, hope SS-version will have it stock... Pascal
__________________
Speeding doesn't kill. Suddenly stopping does...
2001 Honda CBR 929 RR FireBlade 2004 Chevrolet Silverado SS 2009 BMW K1300GT Future Car: 2012 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 Manual |
|
05-23-2008, 01:30 AM | #91 |
Drives: X-15 Velocipede Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 4,637
|
I guess it must be true
__________________
Go from the presence of a foolish man, when thou perceivest not in him the lips of knowledge
General Motors ASEP, A.S. Automotive Technology, Telecommunications Specialist, CISCO Network Engineer STANDARD DISCLAIMER camaro5 is furnishing this information "as is". camaro5 does not provide any warranty of the information whatsoever, whether express, implied, or statutory, including, but not limited to, any warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose or any warranty that the contents of the information will be error-free. |
05-23-2008, 01:32 AM | #92 | |
Drives: 2006 Cobalt, 2004 Taurus wagon Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 3,812
|
Quote:
Anyway...I don't see why the battery placement is such a big surprise. Heck, even the Cobalt has a trunk mounted battery. It isn't so uncommon anymore. |
|
05-23-2008, 01:41 AM | #93 |
Drives: X-15 Velocipede Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 4,637
|
I'd like to get some disciple or other feedback on the trunk mounted battery. In the G8 it's on the left side of the car to offset the weight of the driver on the right side. They didn't move it to the right for left hand drive.
I wonder if the Camaro's battery is on the passenger side (right in US) or drivers side (left in US). Hopefully it's on the right side to offset drivers weight in the U.S. b
__________________
Go from the presence of a foolish man, when thou perceivest not in him the lips of knowledge
General Motors ASEP, A.S. Automotive Technology, Telecommunications Specialist, CISCO Network Engineer STANDARD DISCLAIMER camaro5 is furnishing this information "as is". camaro5 does not provide any warranty of the information whatsoever, whether express, implied, or statutory, including, but not limited to, any warranty of merchantability or fitness for a particular purpose or any warranty that the contents of the information will be error-free. |
05-23-2008, 01:52 AM | #94 | |||
Truth Enforcer
Drives: anything I can get my hands on Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: anywhere and everywhere
Posts: 22,797
|
Quote:
not to bust your chops eric... buuuuut, comparing two cars with different weight and gearing options makes it unfair to compare. just cus the vette can pull off those numbers with the LS3 doesnt mean a camaro will be able to.
__________________
Never race anything you can't afford to light on fire and push off a cliff
A group as a whole tends to be smarter than the smartest person in that group until one jackass convinces everyone otherwise. Quote:
Quote:
|
|||
05-23-2008, 02:12 AM | #95 |
Every BMW had the Battery rear mounted.
I'm still waiting for further information on the SS edition. I'm only interested in an SS edition; in addition to my Silverado SS. Pascal
__________________
Speeding doesn't kill. Suddenly stopping does...
2001 Honda CBR 929 RR FireBlade 2004 Chevrolet Silverado SS 2009 BMW K1300GT Future Car: 2012 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 Manual |
|
05-23-2008, 07:55 AM | #96 | |
Drives: . Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: .
Posts: 196
|
Quote:
An engine itself doesn't get a specific mpg so stating that the 3.6Di in the CTS gets blank MPG is senseless and totally irrelevant. 1. Could be different gearing CTS versus Camaro 2. The CTS is heavier than the Camaro. 3. Mileage also depends on total frontal area of the car (it's how the coefficient of drag is calculated). Since we don't know the coefficient of drag for the Camaro to compare it to the CTS we can't know the mileage. 4. The Camaro might actually get a slightly detuned version of the 3.6DI to enable better mileage. 5. We keep hearing that it might get active fuel management which would bump up highway mileage. In short, we don't know anything yet. We might be surprised, but then again we might not. |
|
05-23-2008, 10:13 AM | #97 | |
Camaro & Stang Enthusiast
Drives: 2011 Mustang 5.0 in Kona Blue Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Miami
Posts: 4,752
|
Quote:
|
|
05-23-2008, 10:42 AM | #98 | |
SS Lightning
Drives: An SRT8 Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Cinnaminson, NJ
Posts: 2,285
|
wrong......I know for a fact that DI V6 camaro would spank that ass aganist the mustang but... not so sure about the challenger R/T it has 370 HP and 375 with the six-speed, yes I know it is 2 tons and the camaro is under 3700....maybe but I think the extra 75 horses and the six-speed is more than enough to kick the DI V6 camaro's ass, so the DI V6 gota go way faster than 300hp, I was expecting 350-380 horses for the mid-trim but 300 come on man, and does this mean that the camaro would have only one v8 trim??, comments
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Camaro Product Manager - interview | Moose | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 11 | 04-04-2012 06:10 PM |
GM memo to dealers | Moose | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 41 | 02-04-2010 07:33 PM |
Official Camaro Convertible CONCEPT Press Release | Tran | Camaro Convertible Forum | 12 | 11-18-2009 07:05 PM |
Camaro (concept) Press Release!! | Pencil.Fight | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 4 | 07-21-2008 03:33 PM |
Consumer Guide's Impressions of the 2010 Chevrolet Camaro | camaro5 | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 30 | 04-29-2008 10:20 PM |