Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
dave@hennessey
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Forced Induction - V8


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-24-2020, 07:41 AM   #15
rgrmoreira13

 
rgrmoreira13's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 2SS 1LE
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Miami WADE County
Posts: 1,127
For those that have gone through the process, what's the one thing that you wish you had done while you had everything apart for your build?


Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk[/QUOTE]


Well in my experience I wish I gotten everything once. I ended up getting 1050x injectors for my procharged 1LE. I ended up doing a cam install on it but I wish I had gotten a forged crankshaft, pistons and rods along with the new and bigger heads. Because now that I am at 700rwhp and I know the block could handle whatever the blower will throw at it. I agree with the people said about the fuel system. I would recommend the dual or even triple pump to get your fuel needs, you don't need a BAP going bad or burning up your ZL1 fuel pump.
__________________
Specs

TSP Stage 2 Boosted Cam 227/235 at 114 LSA
Fore Innovation Triple pump staged (Walbro 342 primary and 2x Walbro 450 secondaries)
Procharger D1x with a 3.85 pulley
ID1050x Injectors
Flex Fuel Sensor
Monster LT1 Twin Disk Clutch
Holley Sniper Efi Intake Manifold
NW 103mm Boosted TB
747rwhp at 12psi on E85
rgrmoreira13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2020, 10:47 AM   #16
larry_g

 
larry_g's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 1SS/1LE
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 826
Quote:
Originally Posted by rgrmoreira13 View Post
Well in my experience I wish I gotten everything once. I ended up getting 1050x injectors for my procharged 1LE. I ended up doing a cam install on it but I wish I had gotten a forged crankshaft, pistons and rods along with the new and bigger heads. Because now that I am at 700rwhp and I know the block could handle whatever the blower will throw at it. I agree with the people said about the fuel system. I would recommend the dual or even triple pump to get your fuel needs, you don't need a BAP going bad or burning up your ZL1 fuel pump.
Thanks for the input. I'm hoping the LSA bottom end is stout enough even if I decide to dial up the boost a bit in the future. Everybody keeps going back to fuel...maybe I'll stumble across a deal that's too good to refuse.
larry_g is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2020, 12:28 PM   #17
Bigdumogre

 
Bigdumogre's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Camaro SS
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: New York
Posts: 1,434
Quote:
Originally Posted by larry_g View Post
Thanks for the input. I'm hoping the LSA bottom end is stout enough even if I decide to dial up the boost a bit in the future. Everybody keeps going back to fuel...maybe I'll stumble across a deal that's too good to refuse.
A lot of people neglect building up the fuel system. Everyone is worried about getting air in and out and not building up the fuel to handle all that power. Just like suspension most people add coil overs and lowering springs and just stop there.
__________________
2012 Camaro 2SS/RS - CSP Custom Cam 232/240 .615/.615 113 +3, Texas speed CNC heads, FTI billet triple disc converter, K&N cai, Katech ported TB, GPI Ported/rod modded manifold, Texas speed 1 7/8 headers, HFC, Flowmaster 2 chambers with x pipe, Mishimoto CC, MSD wires, Roto fab washer relocation, tru cool 40k trans cooler, apex scoop, Pedders extreme coil overs and much more!!
Bigdumogre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2020, 12:37 PM   #18
Batmanntexas

 
Batmanntexas's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Camaro SS (2SS)
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Stafford, VA
Posts: 1,374
Quote:
Originally Posted by larry_g View Post
Ok, so I'm probably borderline with fuel but I'm going to wait until after my first trip to the dyno to see where I baseline with the new setup. Especially because I'm probably going to have to swap pulleys to get to my goal.

Those are relatively easy parts to replace... what's the one thing that made you say "shit, I should have done this while I had it all apart"?

Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk
Going with a bigger cam from the start. Also, if you decide to swap the fuel pump, bite the bullet and go triples. You might be satisfied with the new power, but even new power starts to feel 'normal' after a while...
__________________
745RWHP/634RWTQ on 93 @ 10psi
806/676 on E85 @ 10psi

COTW 9/8/14
Batmanntexas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2020, 01:48 PM   #19
larry_g

 
larry_g's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 1SS/1LE
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 826
Quote:
Originally Posted by Batmanntexas View Post
Going with a bigger cam from the start. Also, if you decide to swap the fuel pump, bite the bullet and go triples. You might be satisfied with the new power, but even new power starts to feel 'normal' after a while...
That's what my wife is afraid of
larry_g is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2020, 02:53 PM   #20
Greenhornet2

 
Greenhornet2's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro 2SS LS3 Whipple
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,925
I don't know about the cam thing. I kinda wish i went with a smaller lift cam just because it's less maintenance i don't like the idea of replacing my springs every 20-25k miles. I woulda stayed under .600 if i were to do it again. Dual ir triple pumps are great. My plan was a dsx aux pump because it will handle 1000whp on gas, if you're gonna run e85 and want that much power need more pump. Also you don't have to drop the tank for the aux pump. Pros and cons. I don't like the idea of drilling in to the tank. Really depends on your end goals which are very hard to determine when you are just starting out. My end goals changed a bunch as i build lol.
__________________
Whipple 2.9 CAI ID1050x injectors ZL1 Pump JRE FPCM JMS Voltage booster JRE Rough Idle blower cam BTR .660 springs CHE trunnion kit 1 7/8 Speed Engineering Borla Atak JRE scoop 1.5" lowering springs BMR trailing arms and toe links Cradle inserts 704WHP 603WTQ 93 octane
Greenhornet2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2020, 10:52 AM   #21
rgrmoreira13

 
rgrmoreira13's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 2SS 1LE
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Miami WADE County
Posts: 1,127
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greenhornet2 View Post
I don't know about the cam thing. I kinda wish i went with a smaller lift cam just because it's less maintenance i don't like the idea of replacing my springs every 20-25k miles. I woulda stayed under .600 if i were to do it again. Dual ir triple pumps are great. My plan was a dsx aux pump because it will handle 1000whp on gas, if you're gonna run e85 and want that much power need more pump. Also you don't have to drop the tank for the aux pump. Pros and cons. I don't like the idea of drilling in to the tank. Really depends on your end goals which are very hard to determine when you are just starting out. My end goals changed a bunch as i build lol.
The other option is to drop the rear cradle and you have access to the fuel tank and you remove the pump and I guess while you are there you can add all the bushings for the rear suspension
__________________
Specs

TSP Stage 2 Boosted Cam 227/235 at 114 LSA
Fore Innovation Triple pump staged (Walbro 342 primary and 2x Walbro 450 secondaries)
Procharger D1x with a 3.85 pulley
ID1050x Injectors
Flex Fuel Sensor
Monster LT1 Twin Disk Clutch
Holley Sniper Efi Intake Manifold
NW 103mm Boosted TB
747rwhp at 12psi on E85
rgrmoreira13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2020, 12:36 PM   #22
larry_g

 
larry_g's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 1SS/1LE
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 826
Quote:
Originally Posted by rgrmoreira13 View Post
The other option is to drop the rear cradle and you have access to the fuel tank and you remove the pump and I guess while you are there you can add all the bushings for the rear suspension
Already have solid cradle bushings and Z28 rear upper control arm bushings. Not thrilled about dropping the tank but I'm not cutting an access hole under the back seat either.
larry_g is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2020, 12:37 PM   #23
Greenhornet2

 
Greenhornet2's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro 2SS LS3 Whipple
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 1,925
Quote:
Originally Posted by rgrmoreira13 View Post
The other option is to drop the rear cradle and you have access to the fuel tank and you remove the pump and I guess while you are there you can add all the bushings for the rear suspension
Yes already dropped my tank once to put in the zl1 pump, we're i to go back in time i woulda have done a dual pump right then. Dropping the tank is a pita
__________________
Whipple 2.9 CAI ID1050x injectors ZL1 Pump JRE FPCM JMS Voltage booster JRE Rough Idle blower cam BTR .660 springs CHE trunnion kit 1 7/8 Speed Engineering Borla Atak JRE scoop 1.5" lowering springs BMR trailing arms and toe links Cradle inserts 704WHP 603WTQ 93 octane
Greenhornet2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-25-2020, 12:46 PM   #24
racesloth
Dan
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS IOM
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Georgia, USA not the other one
Posts: 1,042
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greenhornet2 View Post
I don't know about the cam thing. I kinda wish i went with a smaller lift cam just because it's less maintenance i don't like the idea of replacing my springs every 20-25k miles. I woulda stayed under .600 if i were to do it again.


Using the valve diameter to lift ratio of .3 guide....

This video is great for valve events and the ratio above - ratio discussion starts at 12:20

LS3
2.65 x .3 = .649 intake
1.60 x .3 = .480 exhaust

But no one would want to buy a cam with .480 exhaust lift

That said the BTR stage III PD cam awesome - he keeps his exhaust about .595 IIRC.
__________________
Dan

2010 IOM SS
YSI-B, Pat G Cam, Ported CTS-V Heads, ARH LTs MBRP 3" exhaust
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showth...&highlight=ysi
racesloth is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-27-2020, 11:09 AM   #25
larry_g

 
larry_g's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 1SS/1LE
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Louisville, KY
Posts: 826
Quote:
Originally Posted by racesloth View Post
Using the valve diameter to lift ratio of .3 guide....

This video is great for valve events and the ratio above - ratio discussion starts at 12:20

LS3
2.65 x .3 = .649 intake
1.60 x .3 = .480 exhaust

But no one would want to buy a cam with .480 exhaust lift

That said the BTR stage III PD cam awesome - he keeps his exhaust about .595 IIRC.
Video?
larry_g is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2020, 08:07 AM   #26
racesloth
Dan
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS IOM
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Georgia, USA not the other one
Posts: 1,042
__________________
Dan

2010 IOM SS
YSI-B, Pat G Cam, Ported CTS-V Heads, ARH LTs MBRP 3" exhaust
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showth...&highlight=ysi
racesloth is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.