Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Bigwormgraphix
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-06-2010, 10:17 PM   #57
ROD1
Retired
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro RS V6 #1301 DOB 3/23/09
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Ithaca NY
Posts: 2,563
Quote:
Originally Posted by spyderbuddy View Post
So, just I understand, 93 octane is not going to hurt my engine or systems. And 87 octane is not going to hurt anything either since the car was designed to run on this fuel. We know the gas mileage will not really change unless you change your driving habits. I haven't really seen a difference. But we could see a performace difference though it may just be because the timing is not backing off.
If your not pushing it and your driving to get good gas milage then I don't think you will notice much difference using 87 since it won't be pulling much timing and you will get the benefit of the full stroke.
ROD1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2010, 12:05 PM   #58
spyderbuddy


 
spyderbuddy's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 RS Inferno Orange Metallic
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Albany, Ga.
Posts: 3,398
Ok, Well I put 87 octane back in the car last week and Damn, the Camaro just really did not want to run as good as it was. She got sluggess and well just did not want to go. I put 93 octane in it this week and got her back to running good. So, as far as I'm concerned I'm running 93 octane until it gets so high I can't afford it.
__________________
PCP Hideaway Headlight Covers, BBK Headers & High Flow Cats, ZL1 Add-ons Wicker Bill, TL1/ZL1 Hood Insert, Gen5 DIY Frameless Mirror, ABL Dash Lighting an My link Navigation, Blacked out Rear Bowtie, all Sylvania led Turn Signals, Ceramic Window Tint By Nicks, MBRP Exhaust tips, GEN5 DIY Virginia Legal DRL Harness, Painted Brake Calipers, Vittesse Throttle Controller, Heritage Grill, Diode Dynamics Led Lighting, Manual Shifter Boot, Paddle Shifters, CNC Throttle Body, Trifecta Tune, RX Catch Can & Breather, Trunk Black out and Side Grills, Chevorlet door Sills.

Last edited by spyderbuddy; 06-22-2010 at 10:10 PM.
spyderbuddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2010, 09:28 PM   #59
dannkimmel
 
dannkimmel's Avatar
 
Drives: 1lt,rjt,m6 &2004 harley
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: kendall ny
Posts: 96
ive been thinking about this......and
i was wondering if it wer possable that due to
production "tolarances" so to speak.
is it possable that some of the 87 octane is actuallly less than 87
and therefor when some one tries somthing higher there is in fact a differance becuse the car was not getting the 87 it was ment to have?

in other words by useing 89 or better one is sure of getting the 87 minumum?
dannkimmel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2010, 10:09 PM   #60
USAFJeeper
Bringing mullets back
 
USAFJeeper's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Rally Yellow 2LT/RS
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Middle Georgia
Posts: 632
I tried 89, not as good as 93 to me. Again, YMMV!
__________________
Stripes, InJen CAI, Flowmaster American Thunder exhaust system, Knight Rider scanner bar behind the grill (sue me!, I like it!)

Next - Tinting
USAFJeeper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-22-2010, 10:15 PM   #61
renke
IN10ZRS
 
renke's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Victory Red 2LT RS #39698
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: MN
Posts: 60
During the Hot Rod Power Tour I discussed what I had learned from the two dyno runs with a person walking into the Mid America Motorsports facility as follows:

1. Hytech Motorsports DynaJet Dyno 241 HP 224 TQ regular gas 87 octane

2. St. Paul Automotive Mustang Dyno 264 HP 222 TQ preimum gas 92 octane

The person then identified himself as an engineer from GM Performance Division and the results are exactly what we should expect from the 217 CI 3.6L V6.

He then stated with 100 octane gas the engine can produce ~300 HP at the rear wheels or 371-375 HP at the driveshaft. WOW! Why buy a V8?

If you use a higher octance fuel and drive the engine hard you will see more horsepower out of the new 3.6 L.
__________________
IN10ZRS
renke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2010, 01:19 PM   #62
priz23
On 2nd 2010
 
priz23's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS -Cyber Gray
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Minooka, IL
Posts: 168
Quote:
Originally Posted by renke View Post
During the Hot Rod Power Tour I discussed what I had learned from the two dyno runs with a person walking into the Mid America Motorsports facility as follows:

1. Hytech Motorsports DynaJet Dyno 241 HP 224 TQ regular gas 87 octane

2. St. Paul Automotive Mustang Dyno 264 HP 222 TQ preimum gas 92 octane

The person then identified himself as an engineer from GM Performance Division and the results are exactly what we should expect from the 217 CI 3.6L V6.

He then stated with 100 octane gas the engine can produce ~300 HP at the rear wheels or 371-375 HP at the driveshaft. WOW! Why buy a V8?

If you use a higher octance fuel and drive the engine hard you will see more horsepower out of the new 3.6 L.
Can he point us to the gas stations that have 100 octane!
__________________
priz23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2010, 05:22 PM   #63
UrInsan3
Ur Insan3
 
UrInsan3's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro LS Black
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Cincinnati, Oh
Posts: 43
When I bought my car I asked if I should put in higher octane. They said no, to keep it at 87 - it's what the engine is made for. If you're going to switch, you should do it from the start. In my dad's 928 he switched octane randomly after having the car for years and now can't switch back because his idle rev is jacked up. Also, the mechanics at the dealership can tell if you've been running the improper octane, I don't know if they'll complain if you're running higher octane in a v6, but you'll have warranty issues if you run 87 or 91 in a v8.

My 2c.
__________________
-2010 Black LS | Picked up off the lot 4/26/2010 | Brand Spankin' new and didn't have to wait for a 6 week order
UrInsan3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2010, 05:49 PM   #64
Maurdib

 
Maurdib's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Black Camaro 2LT/RS Auto
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: San Fernando Valley
Posts: 751
Quote:
Originally Posted by UrInsan3 View Post
When I bought my car I asked if I should put in higher octane. They said no, to keep it at 87 - it's what the engine is made for. If you're going to switch, you should do it from the start. In my dad's 928 he switched octane randomly after having the car for years and now can't switch back because his idle rev is jacked up. Also, the mechanics at the dealership can tell if you've been running the improper octane, I don't know if they'll complain if you're running higher octane in a v6, but you'll have warranty issues if you run 87 or 91 in a v8.

My 2c.
YOu will never get in trouble from running a higher octane, but you will running a lower, I started using 91, and the car seems more powerfull, could just be wishfull thinking, but hey I'll side with the GM engineer lol
__________________
BackInBlack
Performance:Vararam cold air intake
Maurdib is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2010, 06:04 PM   #65
SummitWhiteLS
 
SummitWhiteLS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Mustang V6 Automatic
Join Date: May 2010
Location: NY
Posts: 657
Quote:
Originally Posted by renke View Post
... The person then identified himself as an engineer from GM Performance Division ... He then stated with 100 octane gas the engine can produce ~300 HP at the rear wheels or 371-375 HP at the driveshaft.


First of all, what exactly is "drive shaft" hp? I heard of "crank" hp and "whp" hp, but that's it.

Second, there is NO FREAKING WAY that our v6 (or any other production engine) is going to make an EXTRA 70 hp at the crank with just race gas.

Not gonna happen. Nope.

That guy either didn't know what he was talking about, or he was just plain lying.

I mean, think about it ...

Q: If a supercharger usually adds around 90-100 hp at the crank, then how can just changing to race gas in an otherwise stock engine gonna give someone 3/4 of that?

A: It Can't.
SummitWhiteLS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2010, 06:26 PM   #66
67 GTO
13.453 @ 101.90
 
67 GTO's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2LT Rally Yellow
Join Date: May 2009
Location: SE Pa.
Posts: 1,877
My car runs great on 93 Sunoco, I'll drop back to 89 when the cost of fuel goes ballistic. The manual sez 87 or higher, good enough for me.
__________________


GMPP exhaust/JBA shorties/Vararam CAI/VMax TB/SLP Pulley/VMax IM isolator/MACE Ported IM +Plenum Spacer/IPF Tuned
67 GTO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2010, 06:29 PM   #67
Maurdib

 
Maurdib's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Black Camaro 2LT/RS Auto
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: San Fernando Valley
Posts: 751
Quote:
Originally Posted by SummitWhiteLS View Post


First of all, what exactly is "drive shaft" hp? I heard of "crank" hp and "whp" hp, but that's it.

Second, there is NO FREAKING WAY that our v6 (or any other production engine) is going to make an EXTRA 70 hp at the crank with just race gas.

Not gonna happen. Nope.

That guy either didn't know what he was talking about, or he was just plain lying.

I mean, think about it ...

Q: If a supercharger usually adds around 90-100 hp at the crank, then how can just changing to race gas in an otherwise stock engine gonna give someone 3/4 of that?

A: It Can't.

Then I guess you know more then the perfomance engineers then right
__________________
BackInBlack
Performance:Vararam cold air intake
Maurdib is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2010, 06:34 PM   #68
Deepsky
Deepsky
 
Deepsky's Avatar
 
Drives: 1LT/RS, V6, CAI, AMT T-Rex
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Columbia, SC
Posts: 15
Send a message via ICQ to Deepsky
NO ETHANOL GAS

Quote:
Originally Posted by spyderbuddy View Post
Ok it would cost me to much to just go buy gas that has no ethanol. There no stations listed for albany ga. We do have a SHELL but most everyone around mixes their fuels with ethanol

This is the way it is...Our good friend in Venezuela, Hugo Chavez, owns CITGO. He does not put Ethanol in his gas.
It is the way to go (at least in S.C.) for ETOH - free gas if you do not mind supporting a dictatorship.

The station near where I live advertises with a huge sign -100% GAS no ethanol.
Deepsky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2010, 07:16 PM   #69
spyderbuddy


 
spyderbuddy's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 RS Inferno Orange Metallic
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Albany, Ga.
Posts: 3,398
Quote:
Originally Posted by renke View Post
During the Hot Rod Power Tour I discussed what I had learned from the two dyno runs with a person walking into the Mid America Motorsports facility as follows:

1. Hytech Motorsports DynaJet Dyno 241 HP 224 TQ regular gas 87 octane. So if this is the 312hp at crank

2. St. Paul Automotive Mustang Dyno 264 HP 222 TQ preimum gas 92 octane. Does this mean we have 335 hp at crank?

The person then identified himself as an engineer from GM Performance Division and the results are exactly what we should expect from the 217 CI 3.6L V6.

He then stated with 100 octane gas the engine can produce ~300 HP at the rear wheels or 371-375 HP at the driveshaft. WOW! Why buy a V8?

If you use a higher octance fuel and drive the engine hard you will see more horsepower out of the new 3.6 L.


So if i add BK's Headers which are good for approx 33 rwhp
And a Cold air intake say 5 - 10 hp


we could end up with say 373 - 378 hp at the crank. Roughly we could be seeing in the neighborhood of say 300rwhpwow
__________________
PCP Hideaway Headlight Covers, BBK Headers & High Flow Cats, ZL1 Add-ons Wicker Bill, TL1/ZL1 Hood Insert, Gen5 DIY Frameless Mirror, ABL Dash Lighting an My link Navigation, Blacked out Rear Bowtie, all Sylvania led Turn Signals, Ceramic Window Tint By Nicks, MBRP Exhaust tips, GEN5 DIY Virginia Legal DRL Harness, Painted Brake Calipers, Vittesse Throttle Controller, Heritage Grill, Diode Dynamics Led Lighting, Manual Shifter Boot, Paddle Shifters, CNC Throttle Body, Trifecta Tune, RX Catch Can & Breather, Trunk Black out and Side Grills, Chevorlet door Sills.
spyderbuddy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-24-2010, 08:15 PM   #70
Wingsfan
 
Wingsfan's Avatar
 
Drives: Synergy Camaro, Escape
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Michigan
Posts: 368
I didnt notice any diffrences between grades.
__________________
http://a5.sphotos.ak.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ak-snc6/168253_189059481121236_100000515556247_683257_8161  219_n.jpg
Wingsfan is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
V6 Camaro Performance Upgrades rtcat600man Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 387 09-19-2019 06:53 PM
GM nears completion of twin-turbo V6 (LF3) to combat Ford’s new EcoBoost engine Tran 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 91 01-11-2011 07:37 PM
V6, A6 Guys, I think I found the MPG sweet spot Maurdib 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 23 05-11-2010 06:31 PM
Lowering springs and rear gears V6 information macwest 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 12 04-30-2010 10:58 PM
2010 Camaro SS & V6 Line Lock/Roll Control Meister@Torq Suspension / Chassis / Brakes 0 02-23-2010 11:27 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.