07-09-2009, 11:57 AM | #1 |
Booooosted.
|
irpq11, L99 Dyno results.
Ok fellas. Here are the results from my Dyno this morning.
The tuner was particularly puzzled by the fuel mixture running so rich to abnormal levels. He seemed pretty concerned. Said it may be causing HP loss. EDIT: Turns out he was exactly right. The fuse pull solved the problem. Last edited by PQ; 05-16-2012 at 10:26 AM. |
07-09-2009, 12:02 PM | #2 |
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS VR-BLACK Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Southeast Fl
Posts: 392
|
Are the HP and torque #'s where they are supposed to be ?
__________________
2010 2SS/RS VICTORY RED / BLACK LEATHER - 6 SPEED M TRANS
6000 = Delivered To Customer-8/22/2009 |
07-09-2009, 12:03 PM | #3 |
Drives: C6 Zed-oh-six Join Date: May 2009
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 677
|
seems to be pretty normal for the HP #'s
__________________
|
07-09-2009, 12:03 PM | #4 |
Drives: 99 Grand Prix Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 334
|
they do seem a touch low. Could indicated a program issue.
I think the more significant thing here, is that if there is a programming issue, it could also affect the way the transmission shifts, as well as the torque management, thus further compounding the issue |
07-09-2009, 12:03 PM | #5 |
Blessed
Drives: 2013 Sonic RS MT Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Saint Augustine FL
Posts: 28,444
|
What else did he say??? was he happy with the HP numbers? Or did he think it was under powered?
I'm sure I should know this... but what should it be at the rear wheels?
__________________
Click image to see build thread. PQ - "the love of cars. It's a boys first step toward manhood and a mans last hold on boyhood." Fbodfather - "We do not want to use the Z28 moniker on a car that does not deserve this hallowed name." The_Blur - "Let's not confuse competitors with equals." |
07-09-2009, 12:07 PM | #6 |
Booooosted.
|
He said that in his opinion, this car should be losing no more than 15% from crank to wheels. He thinks the rich fuel mixture is causing a loss. In his opinion it should be getting 330 HP to the wheels. He says this car should be tighter than that.
|
07-09-2009, 12:08 PM | #7 |
Drives: 2010 Camaro, 2SS/RS Join Date: May 2009
Location: King George, Va
Posts: 881
|
What caused the 20 hp jump from first to third dyno pulls?
Seems low to me, I would take the first dyno run into the dealer and put up the big WTF?!
__________________
2010 2SS/RS CGM American Racing Headers, Magnaflow axle back, Roto-Fab CAI, Audio Integrations Sub box, Alpine Type R 10, Alpine MRP-500 amp, Pro Clips iPhone Mount |
07-09-2009, 12:08 PM | #8 |
PWA Relapse
|
They should be able 320 at the rear wheels, but that A/F ratio looks a bit weird to me as well... That could quite possibly be messing with your numbers. Of course, it could be something else as well.
- X
__________________
2017 1LT/RS A8 Hyper Blue Metallic |
07-09-2009, 12:08 PM | #9 |
Drives: 99 Grand Prix Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Toronto
Posts: 334
|
actually, on further inspection, those seem very wonky...
i mean run 1, the torque and hp curves are nearly idenicel.....very strange....as well the A/F graph is messed...took a major plunge at 4.5 k rpm to 10:1....NOT normal and 200lb feet of torque at 4000 rpm...i mean....wow...not normal run 2 you A:F is low, and your torque is taking a dive, but more normal then the first run 3, same issues as 1, A/F dive at 4k rpm torque too low for the rpm at 4000 |
07-09-2009, 12:09 PM | #10 |
Drives: CTS-V Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Raleigh NC
Posts: 1,069
|
Wow rich in the mid , I wonder if the WBO2 is off ?
__________________
10.8@130.8 610 whp, CAI, 2.5, E85, id850 on street tires.
|
07-09-2009, 12:10 PM | #11 |
They seem in line with the lower side of what most people are pulling in on the L99 (which seems to range about 310-330 depending on the dyno and other factors)
I wouldn't say that kind of dyno pull would be indicative of a car that is losing 1.5-2 seconds to 60. Edit: I mean the actual HP numbers. Analysis of the A/F mixture and curves is beyond my ability.
__________________
A House Divided...
|
|
07-09-2009, 12:11 PM | #12 |
Drives: The Imperial Army Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: The Darkside
Posts: 15,742
|
Yeah man its a tad bit off..2nd and 3rd would be acceptable but your a/f is kinda wacked...wth happened with the 1st run?
|
07-09-2009, 12:13 PM | #13 |
hmmmmm
Drives: 2010 IOM in-n-out 2SS Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 1,325
|
hmmm, interesting, thanks for posting this up
__________________
"Responsibility is a Heavy Responsibilty" (Cheech)
|
07-09-2009, 12:16 PM | #14 |
Looking at the low starting torque on run 1, I wonder...
irpq, you've said that you randomly had the car 'wake up' the other day, though it seems intermittent? I've been thinking about my theory that the car doesn't respond as well to mashing the throttle from the get-go...all my best launches have been in situations where I smoothly feed the throttle in and I've had some disappointing launches where I rammed it...is it possible that some aspect of the L99 software is limiting maximum torque from a dead stop? Perhaps some sort of break-in software?
__________________
A House Divided...
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Texas Speed Long Tubes & Rumbler 5 Cat-Back Dyno Results! | Trevor @ Texas Speed | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 48 | 12-08-2018 02:37 AM |
Check your Order here | bvonscott | Camaro Price | Ordering | Tracking | Dealers Discussions | 665 | 06-29-2009 01:00 PM |
L99 STOCK dyno video and results | pharmd | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 7 | 06-25-2009 10:05 AM |
Dyno Results on L99? | pharmd | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 23 | 05-12-2009 10:53 PM |
BUDWEISER SHOOTOUT LINE UP | CamaroScotty | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 22 | 02-07-2009 07:03 PM |