Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Roto-Fab
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-14-2020, 06:14 PM   #29
Sparko
 
Sparko's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS
Join Date: May 2019
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 152
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeman View Post
If that's true, then why do people always say that it's okay to run 87 and anything higher is a waste of money? Not that I'm disagreeing with you, I'm not, but just what people around here say when stuff like this is mentioned.
Because if you are not upping the octane for purely performance gain it is a waste of money. Higher octane is more resistant to ignition which decreases fuel economy and starts harder in cold weather. If you put anything other than 87 in a car that can operate on 87 to go get groceries and/or put-put around you are wasting money. If you're ripping up the road operating at WOT, that is when high octane is useful.
__________________
2010 Camaro 2SS
2018 Charger GT+
2005 Cavailer LS S/C - Sold
'87 HD FXRT - Wrecked pending repair
Sparko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2020, 06:38 PM   #30
CamaroBarb
Banned
 
Drives: cheby Camaro
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: usa
Posts: 575
The fact is the v6 engine is no different than the v8 engine when it comes to fuel. The only reason you can use regular in either one is because the computer pulls the timing out.
This goes for the LLT LFX and so on.

Last edited by CamaroBarb; 01-16-2020 at 01:55 PM.
CamaroBarb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2020, 06:41 PM   #31
CamaroBarb
Banned
 
Drives: cheby Camaro
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: usa
Posts: 575
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sparko View Post
Because if you are not upping the octane for purely performance gain it is a waste of money. Higher octane is more resistant to ignition which decreases fuel economy and starts harder in cold weather. If you put anything other than 87 in a car that can operate on 87 to go get groceries and/or put-put around you are wasting money. If you're ripping up the road operating at WOT, that is when high octane is useful.
Back when compression ratio's were 8.5 to 1 yes but the fact is if you put regular in your v6 or v8 11 to 1 compression ratio engine the computer pulls timing so it doesn't ping detonate and destroy itself. AND GDI engiines are prone to Low Speed Pre Ignition. So at low engine speeds using regular the computer actually pulls the timing NEGATIVE to try and prevent it.

Last edited by CamaroBarb; 01-14-2020 at 07:15 PM.
CamaroBarb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2020, 07:41 AM   #32
gtstorey

 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS2,L99, LSA SC
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 2,154
Even if the car only has the low octane table, it's still "safe" to run the higher octane gas. I think a lot of people think that high octane means more "power" in the fuel or bigger explosions in the cylinders, hence "unsafe" to run in motors not designed for it.
To the O.P., don't let this discussion of high and low octane tables throw you, within reason, it will be "safe" to run higher octane in a vehicle that is designed to run well on lower. There may be some special race gas with a very high octane rating that may not run well, but even then its's probably "safe".
gtstorey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2020, 10:54 AM   #33
ariZona28
Give speed a chance
 
ariZona28's Avatar
 
Drives: 2015 Camaro 2LS, 2015 Camaro Z/28
Join Date: Nov 2019
Location: Mesa, Az
Posts: 2,228
Does the LFX in my '15 have a "table" to take advantage of 91 octane fuel? Car is completely stock, no mods or tune work done. How can I check/monitor timing. Gone are the days of hooking up the Craftsman timing light and eye-balling the marks on the harmonic balancer.
Attached Images
 
ariZona28 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2020, 11:32 AM   #34
Badbubba
GrINned & JUICEd
 
Badbubba's Avatar
 
Drives: 15STI, 10Expy, 10 2SS/RS M6, 47KB1
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,247
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamaroBarb View Post
Let me explain it in terms you may understand. Your v6 Camaro has 2 yes 2 timing tables programmed into the tune. If you use REGULAR fuel it will use the low octane table, if you use PREMIUM fuel it will use the high octane table. So you can use either one, your choice. There are benefits to using premium fuel like more detergents, better fuel mileage and better performance. Your experience may be different than other, all cars are slightly different. Good Luck.

In my v6 premium makes a huge difference.
OP displays the ownership of a 2011 LS. Therefore that engine is a LLT. In 2012 the LLT was replaced with the LFX. The LLT tables differ from the LFX tables by not having 2 tables. The ECMs are different. The Bosch ECM for the LLT will continue to ramp up timing until it detects knock, then back off. In the LLT, add the premium fuel and drive somewhat aggressive to adjust. If there are better detergents in the premium fuel used, they will do nothing to help with the coking of the intake valves. Which might be the issue for the CEL.
__________________
GPI SS3 Cam & stuff,N.O. Plate(dedicated fuel tank,progressive,fuel hose upgrade,remote opener,heater,console switches),LNC2000,CTAP,ARH 1 7/8" LTs/gutted cats/X pipe/mufflers,Jet Hot coated LTs,GPI HPT Tune,CAI, Scoop,Rx Catch Can,Gates heater hose relocation, Remote clutch & auto brake res,Metco loop,Momentum Tunnel Brace,TSW Nurb 18",555 & 05,Pfadt trailing arms & toe rods,Autometer WB,Fesler Pillar Pod,LED strips (int),Lloyds floor & trunk mats,LED DRL/front turn & license plate,DRL harness,VLEDs tail lights,Plasticoat Bowties. Ord: Oct 5, 2009 Rec: Nov 19, 2009 13.17@112.6 stock

Last edited by Badbubba; 01-15-2020 at 12:06 PM.
Badbubba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2020, 01:25 PM   #35
ChibiBlackSheep

 
ChibiBlackSheep's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 2SS/RS, 1968 SS
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Southeast, PA
Posts: 2,092
Quote:
Originally Posted by ariZona28 View Post
Does the LFX in my '15 have a "table" to take advantage of 91 octane fuel? Car is completely stock, no mods or tune work done. How can I check/monitor timing. Gone are the days of hooking up the Craftsman timing light and eye-balling the marks on the harmonic balancer.
Yes, but just putting premium in once won't reset your fuel trims and put you into that table. If you put premium in, unplug your battery for the night. Or else you'll have to run a few tanks through before you start to have any difference.

You can check timing with an OBD2 program or HPTuner software.
__________________
LS3 Crate Engine Swap | CSP Custom Cam 232/240 .615/.615 113 +3 | Stainless Power LT Headers | Z28 Intake | Borla S-Type Exhaust | FTI Triple-Disc Billet 3200 Stall
2012 Camaro 2SS/RS | 1968 Camaro SS | 2020 Cadillac CT5 Premium Luxury | 2021 Spark LS

ChibiBlackSheep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2020, 01:48 PM   #36
pyroguy
Started#gottalovethatblue
 
pyroguy's Avatar
 
Drives: ABM #831
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: TN
Posts: 6,918
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeman View Post
If the factory tune has two fuel maps, low octane and high octane (like ChibiBlackSheep mentioned) then wouldn't it be better to run the higher octane fuel if you wanted better performance?

Yeah, I realize the V6 is not really considered a performance engine, but the driveability will be a lot better on the higher grade fuel. Many years ago, I used to have an old '76 Buick Century 350 that always ran better on high grade fuel than the low grade stuff. And, that was a low compression smogger motor.
Run what you want, but it is set up to run regular as the optimal fuel. Additionally, other than the two being internal combustion engines, your Buick 350 and Camaro V6 are about as different as they come. Comparing the two of them and how they react to the different octanes isn't a real good comparison.
__________________
'10 Camaro 2SS/RS | Aqua Blue #831 of 3,903 | Silver Stripes
Check out my build thread
pyroguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2020, 04:22 PM   #37
CamaroBarb
Banned
 
Drives: cheby Camaro
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: usa
Posts: 575
Quote:
Originally Posted by mikeman View Post

Yeah, I realize the V6 is not really considered a performance engine,
Its not just considered a Performance engine, its considered a EXTREME performance engine! 326 HP from 217 cubic inches NA is outrageous. That's 1.5hp per cubic inch! By comparison the l99 SS only makes 1 hp per cubic inch and the LS3 only slightly more. Don't kid yourself putting anything other than the best fuel in the engine is no different than putting regular in a SS or ZL1. They are all High Performance engines with ultra high compression. Don't believe it please read the specs on all these engines. The compression ratio, hp rating and cubic inches don't lie.
CamaroBarb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2020, 11:13 AM   #38
Badbubba
GrINned & JUICEd
 
Badbubba's Avatar
 
Drives: 15STI, 10Expy, 10 2SS/RS M6, 47KB1
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 1,247
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamaroBarb View Post
Its not just considered a Performance engine, its considered a EXTREME performance engine! 326 HP from 217 cubic inches NA is outrageous. That's 1.5hp per cubic inch! By comparison the l99 SS only makes 1 hp per cubic inch and the LS3 only slightly more. Don't kid yourself putting anything other than the best fuel in the engine is no different than putting regular in a SS or ZL1. They are all High Performance engines with ultra high compression. Don't believe it please read the specs on all these engines. The compression ratio, hp rating and cubic inches don't lie.
The hp difference per cubic inch is due to the 3.6 being direct injected. The advantages of DI also allow for 87 octane to be used to achieve rated hp. The compression ratio for the LLT is 11.3 and for the LFX is 11.5. Which is not extreme for DI engines, it is on the low side. Mazda, for one, is running 13:1 and 14:1 static compression ratios for their DI engines.
__________________
GPI SS3 Cam & stuff,N.O. Plate(dedicated fuel tank,progressive,fuel hose upgrade,remote opener,heater,console switches),LNC2000,CTAP,ARH 1 7/8" LTs/gutted cats/X pipe/mufflers,Jet Hot coated LTs,GPI HPT Tune,CAI, Scoop,Rx Catch Can,Gates heater hose relocation, Remote clutch & auto brake res,Metco loop,Momentum Tunnel Brace,TSW Nurb 18",555 & 05,Pfadt trailing arms & toe rods,Autometer WB,Fesler Pillar Pod,LED strips (int),Lloyds floor & trunk mats,LED DRL/front turn & license plate,DRL harness,VLEDs tail lights,Plasticoat Bowties. Ord: Oct 5, 2009 Rec: Nov 19, 2009 13.17@112.6 stock
Badbubba is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2020, 11:52 AM   #39
mikeman
Banned
 
Drives: 2015 Camaro
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: My Garage
Posts: 1,125
Quote:
Originally Posted by Badbubba View Post
The hp difference per cubic inch is due to the 3.6 being direct injected. The advantages of DI also allow for 87 octane to be used to achieve rated hp. The compression ratio for the LLT is 11.3 and for the LFX is 11.5. Which is not extreme for DI engines, it is on the low side. Mazda, for one, is running 13:1 and 14:1 static compression ratios for their DI engines.
Wow.. That's getting up there almost into diesel territory.

I wonder how far they can go before the fuel just self-ignites?
mikeman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2020, 12:13 PM   #40
KenKat
 
KenKat's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 2LT RS Summit White
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 622
Quote:
Originally Posted by Badbubba View Post
The hp difference per cubic inch is due to the 3.6 being direct injected. The advantages of DI also allow for 87 octane to be used to achieve rated hp. The compression ratio for the LLT is 11.3 and for the LFX is 11.5. Which is not extreme for DI engines, it is on the low side. Mazda, for one, is running 13:1 and 14:1 static compression ratios for their DI engines.
That plus dual overhead cam and 4 valves per cylinder.
KenKat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2020, 12:23 PM   #41
SSEssence
Instagram: Sangstah
 
SSEssence's Avatar
 
Drives: 2019 Camaro 1LE
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: Buena Park, CA.
Posts: 2,803
premium gas only, the highest octane available
__________________
2019 SS 1LE - "CaSSandra" 2014 SS - "AleSSandra - Sold" 94 Z28 - Sold


Follow the build https://www.camaro6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=612717
SSEssence is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2020, 01:51 PM   #42
CamaroBarb
Banned
 
Drives: cheby Camaro
Join Date: Aug 2019
Location: usa
Posts: 575
Regardless what the engines are any engine with 11 to 1 compression needs premium. Only way you are running regular is if they cripple the timing.

Again 323 HP from a 217ci engine is extreme performance and needs premium, GDI or not. LLT LFX l99 LS3 doesn't make any difference. These are all HP engines.

GM is careful not to call the v6 High Performance for good reason. Its their economy Camaro engine, they do however call it their High Feature engine<makes me laugh. It makes 1.5hp per CI much more than their v8 @ 1hp per ci. Which one do you think is a high performance engine.

Last edited by CamaroBarb; 01-16-2020 at 02:06 PM.
CamaroBarb is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.