Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Phastek Performance
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Forced Induction - V8


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-01-2008, 10:21 PM   #29
Mr. Wyndham
I used to be Dragoneye...
 
Mr. Wyndham's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 ZL1 1LE
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 31,876
Send a message via AIM to Mr. Wyndham
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geno View Post
OK guys, I may be wrong on this but I am thinking that the 2.0, 260hp turbo is only rated at 22 mpg highway in the little light Solstice. I would not be happy with that at all. Looks like the same rating on the Saturn Sky.
I don't know where you read those numbers...
But according to here:
http://www.pontiac.com/solstice/inde...yle=&year=2008
(And click "Features & Specs")

The Turbo 2.0L ECOTEC is actually rated at a higher EPA estimate than the 2.4L ECOTEC.

2.4L:
-auto (19/24)
-stick (19/25)

2.0L:
-auto (19/26)
-stick (19/28)
__________________
"Keep the faith." - Fbodfather
Mr. Wyndham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-02-2008, 09:36 AM   #30
Grape Ape
 
Drives: 96 Bronco w/ a 5 speed
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: PNW
Posts: 296
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragoneye View Post
I don't know where you read those numbers...
But according to here:
http://www.pontiac.com/solstice/inde...yle=&year=2008
(And click "Features & Specs")

The Turbo 2.0L ECOTEC is actually rated at a higher EPA estimate than the 2.4L ECOTEC.

2.4L:
-auto (19/24)
-stick (19/25)

2.0L:
-auto (19/26)
-stick (19/28)
And the same 2.0 gets 22/30 in the 3000# 08 Cobalt SS.

I think that if it ended up in a Zeta, two things would happen:

A. It would only be for regions where there is a stiff tax based on engine displacement (China & Europe).

B. It would be tuned for less power and better mileage.
Grape Ape is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2008, 07:21 PM   #31
The_Blur
Moderator
 
The_Blur's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 Harley-Davidson Street Bob
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 14,769
Send a message via AIM to The_Blur
Quote:
Originally Posted by Grape Ape View Post
And the same 2.0 gets 22/30 in the 3000# 08 Cobalt SS.

I think that if it ended up in a Zeta, two things would happen:

A. It would only be for regions where there is a stiff tax based on engine displacement (China & Europe).

B. It would be tuned for less power and better mileage.
I disagree with your second assertion. The Camaro will weigh more than the car that uses it now. It would need more power to make up for the difference in weight.
__________________
RDP Motorsport//GEN5DIY//Cultrag Performance//JPSS//Rodgets Chevrolet//
Operation Demon//Buy at Invoice//RACECARWEAR
RESPECT ALL CARS. LOVE YOUR OWN.
warn 145:159 ban
The_Blur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2008, 10:56 PM   #32
Grape Ape
 
Drives: 96 Bronco w/ a 5 speed
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: PNW
Posts: 296
Quote:
Originally Posted by The_Blur View Post
I disagree with your second assertion. The Camaro will weigh more than the car that uses it now. It would need more power to make up for the difference in weight.
I think the role changes. In the Cobalt, HHR and Kappa twins it is the faster optional engine. If used in a Zeta it would probably be a or near base engine targeted at those more interested in economy than power. A V8 or turbo 6 would presumably also be offered.
Grape Ape is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2008, 02:11 PM   #33
Supermans
Camaro & Stang Enthusiast
 
Supermans's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Mustang 5.0 in Kona Blue
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Miami
Posts: 4,752
Next thing you know in a few years we will be discussing a 1 cylinder camaro in the works and then a few years later a total hybrid camaro. This is a good sign with the 4cyl if it keeps Camaro alive, however I guess this means they might end up getting rid of the 6 cylinder in a few years and keep the 8.. I would hope they would never get rid of the 8 cylinder as that would make every single person on this forum extremely upset and I doubt GM wants to lose this crowd by lowering their high performance model to a 6 cyl only as Nissan has, no matter how fast the engine is..
Supermans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2008, 04:12 PM   #34
LS9CamaroSS
 
LS9CamaroSS's Avatar
 
Drives: Cavalier RS
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Jordan, NY
Posts: 569
Quote:
Originally Posted by radz282003 View Post
I agree with this post regarding FI'ing small displacement engines in the future. It's my understanding the smaller the bore the better/cleaner the burn, hence lower emissions and higher efficiency. If you could cram more air and fuel into a smaller engine and get the same power, why not? I'm a big fan of V8s, and plan on getting a V8 model, however I don't think options like these in these cars would be bad at all. They do well in the cars posted above so that's something to keep in mind too.

As far as the GT-R, I'm not sure that any numbers we've gotten from Nissan are any good from the 'Ring. From the articles I've been reading and posts I've found here and there, the astounding times that that car has been claimed to have have been on an over-boosted engine (compared to the tune that's supposed to be in the production model) and also run on shaved race tires. I know I haven't read every article on the car, but the last one in one of the big rags' was still really positive in it's favor. Yeah, yeah, it's AWD, but hey, it uses it to it's fullest and who can argue that's a bad thing?
Dude this car WHIPPED the snot out of a comparable Corvette... what are you talking about? If you ask me the GT-R should be the BENCHMARK for all sports cars at the moment. If Toyota brings back a Supra expect the GT-R to have a damn good competitor back on the streets... You have to remember that this car is making a whole hell of a lot more power than what it is rated at... and that is per C&D and the rest of the mags that have tested it...
LS9CamaroSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2008, 07:14 PM   #35
Splicerguy
 
Drives: 2002 trailblazer
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 57
Does Gm have a CVT? I was just thinking that the turbo 4 with a CVT might just give the Camaro both great acceleration and great fuel economy.
Splicerguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2008, 07:25 PM   #36
theholycow


 
theholycow's Avatar
 
Drives: '02 GMC Sierra, '80 Lesabre
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: RI
Posts: 1,804
I don't think a CVT that can handle 3600-4000 pounds exists yet.
__________________
Removing weight has surprisingly little effect on fuel economy
Engine break-in procedure | Gear ratios
2002 GMC Sierra 4x4 5.3 (190,000 miles and going strong)
1980 Buick Lesabre family heirloom with 36,000 miles
2008 Volkswagen Rabbit 2 door I5-2.5 5spd DD lease
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamaroSpike23 View Post
she really underestimates the damage i would do to her reproductive organs
http://allOffTopic.com is the place for all the naughty stuff you can't get away with on this forum...
theholycow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2008, 07:49 PM   #37
Splicerguy
 
Drives: 2002 trailblazer
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 57
The Nissan Murano has a CVT with the 3.5 V6 and it weighs 4030 lbs. according to KBB. In a recent auto mag comparison, the Murano was both the fastest and most fuel efficient in the group. A CVT would theoretically be the best transmission for a turbo motor, it keeps the motor on full boost while accelerating. If you could add 3 or 4 mpg to the turbo 4's already good fuel economy, it would help offset the V8.
Splicerguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-06-2008, 08:17 PM   #38
lil_red_v6
one wheelin
 
lil_red_v6's Avatar
 
Drives: 2004 yamaha r6
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: saginaw
Posts: 2,200
Send a message via Yahoo to lil_red_v6
plz dont put it in the camaro
lil_red_v6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2008, 08:00 AM   #39
theholycow


 
theholycow's Avatar
 
Drives: '02 GMC Sierra, '80 Lesabre
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: RI
Posts: 1,804
Quote:
Originally Posted by Splicerguy View Post
The Nissan Murano has a CVT with the 3.5 V6 and it weighs 4030 lbs. according to KBB.
Cool, you learn something new every day!

Quote:
In a recent auto mag comparison, the Murano was both the fastest and most fuel efficient in the group. A CVT would theoretically be the best transmission for a turbo motor, it keeps the motor on full boost while accelerating.
Well said. If they do put the turbo 4 in the Camaro, the CVT should go in with it -- and that should probably be the only configuration with the CVT.
__________________
Removing weight has surprisingly little effect on fuel economy
Engine break-in procedure | Gear ratios
2002 GMC Sierra 4x4 5.3 (190,000 miles and going strong)
1980 Buick Lesabre family heirloom with 36,000 miles
2008 Volkswagen Rabbit 2 door I5-2.5 5spd DD lease
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamaroSpike23 View Post
she really underestimates the damage i would do to her reproductive organs
http://allOffTopic.com is the place for all the naughty stuff you can't get away with on this forum...
theholycow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2008, 03:41 PM   #40
LS9CamaroSS
 
LS9CamaroSS's Avatar
 
Drives: Cavalier RS
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Jordan, NY
Posts: 569
can someone educate me on what CVT is?
LS9CamaroSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-07-2008, 05:05 PM   #41
theholycow


 
theholycow's Avatar
 
Drives: '02 GMC Sierra, '80 Lesabre
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: RI
Posts: 1,804
A CVT is a Continuously Variable Transmission. Instead of having gears, it smoothly adjusts the gear ratio.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continu...e_transmission
__________________
Removing weight has surprisingly little effect on fuel economy
Engine break-in procedure | Gear ratios
2002 GMC Sierra 4x4 5.3 (190,000 miles and going strong)
1980 Buick Lesabre family heirloom with 36,000 miles
2008 Volkswagen Rabbit 2 door I5-2.5 5spd DD lease
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamaroSpike23 View Post
she really underestimates the damage i would do to her reproductive organs
http://allOffTopic.com is the place for all the naughty stuff you can't get away with on this forum...
theholycow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-08-2008, 02:19 PM   #42
LS9CamaroSS
 
LS9CamaroSS's Avatar
 
Drives: Cavalier RS
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Jordan, NY
Posts: 569
Quote:
Originally Posted by theholycow View Post
A CVT is a Continuously Variable Transmission. Instead of having gears, it smoothly adjusts the gear ratio.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Continu...e_transmission
Being a Manual tranny fan i hate this idea then... give me real gears none of this 4wheeler gas it and go crap...
LS9CamaroSS is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Continued: Lutz mentions engine options for Camaro -- 4 cylinder turbo a possibility Tran Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 160 08-08-2008 04:16 PM
Camaro ls3 news...true or false? Dark Knight Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 74 06-05-2008 05:29 PM
Steve Dinan: BMW sets the tone for future combustion engine development Scotsman General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 1 03-25-2008 08:06 PM
Axial Vector Engine Mr. Wyndham General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 6 06-20-2007 04:00 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.