Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Phastek Performance
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Other Generations > 1st & 2nd Generation Camaros


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-16-2014, 12:59 PM   #1
drtwo
 
drtwo's Avatar
 
Drives: 2SS RS Yellow, Raptor, Vrod
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 599
Exclamation 69 Camaro- ?? 17" wheel and tire size to be safe?!

I have a stock 69 SS camaro and want to add 17 inch wheels and am looking for a good wider look but not so big that I risk rubbing.

I understand with research here that the max to be almost safe is:

FRONT: 17x8 with 4.75 backspace with 245/45/17
BACK: 17x9.5 with 5.25? backspace with 275/40/17

1) Doesn't a 40 series in back then make the rear tire shorter(but wider) than the front?

2) If I want to be even a little safer from rubbing what would you use? I'm not going for the widest tire, just a setup that looks good!
how about: FRONT 17x8 with 4.75 backspace with 235/45/17 and BACK 17x9.5 5.25 backspace with 255/40/17
would the front tire truly be taller than the rear due to 40 vs 45 series difference?

3) Is the issue usually the width of the tire or the height of the tires with rubbing?
__________________
2SS RS Rally Yellow, LS3, M6, sunroof, extra on the fast!

Last edited by drtwo; 05-16-2014 at 09:31 PM.
drtwo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2014, 09:45 PM   #2
flyingskibiker
 
flyingskibiker's Avatar
 
Drives: Cars, Trucks, Bikes, ORVs, Planes
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: South SF Bay, CA
Posts: 228
Send a message via Yahoo to flyingskibiker
The width is the first number is the width in mm. It doesn't change. The next number is the aspect ratio. Yes, a 45 has more sidewall than the 40. But since it is a ratio, it may not work out to be taller. Let's see:

245/45R17 = 9.65" wide X 25.68" high X ~4.34" sidewall
275/40R17 = 10.83" wide X 25.66" high X ~4.33" sidewall

235/45R17 = 9.25" wide X 25.33" high X ~4.13" sidewall
255/40R17* = 10.04" wide X 25.03" high X ~4.02" sidewall
*Might have to see what the widest wheel that tire can be mounted on?

I use to run a 14" wheel with 60 series on the front and 15" wheel with 50s on the rear and they were pretty close in height and looked OK (filled the wells)...

The tire can either rub on the frame or wheel well lip if too wide when turning sharply. When my front springs were shot, the tires would "bottom out" on the upper, inner wheel well. So, both can be an issue if one goes to far in either direction... Personally, I don't might the frame rub. It is only at extremes and nothing sharp in that location... But even that could be solved with offset (to a point).
__________________
1968 SS w/ 1966 427/425 Sequoia Green w/ Bumble Bee stripe. Always working on it...
Drooling over the ZL1s. It will be my next car if I can manage to pull it off...
flyingskibiker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-16-2014, 10:02 PM   #3
drtwo
 
drtwo's Avatar
 
Drives: 2SS RS Yellow, Raptor, Vrod
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South Dakota
Posts: 599
Quote:
Originally Posted by flyingskibiker View Post
front: 245/45R17 = 9.65" wide X 25.68" high X ~4.34" sidewall
Rear: 275/40R17 = 10.83" wide X 25.66" high X ~4.33" sidewall

Front: 235/45R17 = 9.25" wide X 25.33" high X ~4.13" sidewall
Rear: 255/40R17* = 10.04" wide X 25.03" high X ~4.02" sidewall
so in both the measurements above the height IS actually up to 1/4 inch smaller in back, but obviously that would be minimal and not noticed.

does anyone know if the backspacing from above is correct?
__________________
2SS RS Rally Yellow, LS3, M6, sunroof, extra on the fast!
drtwo is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:03 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.