Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
TireRack
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Forced Induction - V6


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-20-2009, 10:29 AM   #43
matt55

 
matt55's Avatar
 
Drives: CTS-V
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Raleigh NC
Posts: 1,069
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baldturbofreak View Post
Known facts about the LNF pcm for comparison:
-The MAF reads out to 912 Grams/sec. About 120lbs/min If I remember correctly. Thats 1200hp folks.
-The Pcm is also hardcoded to understand 512Kpa.
-The Pcm does backup airflow calculations by measuring the pressure drop across the TB.THis is the only way to accomplish backup in case of MAF fail due to the widely fluctuating VE's effected by VVT.
-System is Wideband feedback equipped
-Fuel injectors flow 122lbs/hr @ 2200psi (it's rumored that the LLT's are ~96lbs/hr)
-On demand pump has never lost pressure on me, even at 200hp more than stock.
-Pump control could potentially unleash 3000psi and a bit more breathing room on the stock injector.
-System is "torque demand" based. Meaning that your right foot is commanding 0-100% torque. The pcm then calculates the optimum throttle angle, cam angle, and in the LNF's case boost pressure to achieve the torque being requested.
- Is very protective of the engine and will go into halfpower mode when it doesnt like what it sees.
-Individual cyl knock detection.
Wow nice ECU !
__________________
10.8@130.8 610 whp, CAI, 2.5, E85, id850 on street tires.
matt55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2009, 12:07 PM   #44
MadMaxx
Master of the V6
 
MadMaxx's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 1LT/RS
Join Date: May 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 239
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baldturbofreak View Post
Known facts about the LNF pcm for comparison:
-Fuel injectors flow 122lbs/hr @ 2200psi (it's rumored that the LLT's are ~96lbs/hr)
I really hope someone confirms those fuel ratings... I'd be a happy camper

You still need pics of the engine bay?
MadMaxx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2009, 04:40 PM   #45
Baldturbofreak
Turbo kit Jedi
 
Drives: 95 vette,07gxp,02wrx,slazer,
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Honeoye,NY
Posts: 44
Send a message via AIM to Baldturbofreak
Yessir. Wont be buying one until the "craze" is over and I can just pay MSRP/Gm option2.

Even at 96/lbs/hr they are probably "only" capable of 100hp/hole due to the 1/4 cycle injection window.
Baldturbofreak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2009, 11:04 PM   #46
mike25


 
mike25's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Camaro 2SS/RS
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Dubba V
Posts: 2,869
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baldturbofreak View Post
Known facts about the LNF pcm for comparison:
-The MAF reads out to 912 Grams/sec. About 120lbs/min If I remember correctly. Thats 1200hp folks.
-The Pcm is also hardcoded to understand 512Kpa.
-The Pcm does backup airflow calculations by measuring the pressure drop across the TB.THis is the only way to accomplish backup in case of MAF fail due to the widely fluctuating VE's effected by VVT.
-System is Wideband feedback equipped
-Fuel injectors flow 122lbs/hr @ 2200psi (it's rumored that the LLT's are ~96lbs/hr)
-On demand pump has never lost pressure on me, even at 200hp more than stock.
-Pump control could potentially unleash 3000psi and a bit more breathing room on the stock injector.
-System is "torque demand" based. Meaning that your right foot is commanding 0-100% torque. The pcm then calculates the optimum throttle angle, cam angle, and in the LNF's case boost pressure to achieve the torque being requested.
- Is very protective of the engine and will go into halfpower mode when it doesnt like what it sees.
-Individual cyl knock detection.
its almost like gm knew what they were doing when they built this thing.
__________________
2LT/RS M6 CGM VIN#53104 SOLD

2012 Black 2SS/RS w/ Hurst-

Mods:
Corsa catback, SSE, Vararam
mike25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2010, 09:46 AM   #47
RBD
 
RBD's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 SS/RS Convertible
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Mendota, IL
Posts: 715
The problem with the 3.6L will be head sealing they are pretty much at their
limit N/A................
RBD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2010, 10:08 AM   #48
scrming
Red Brick of Vengeance!
 
scrming's Avatar
 
Drives: 12 Second Brick
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: at my pulpit
Posts: 7,745
Quote:
Originally Posted by RBDesigns View Post
The problem with the 3.6L will be head sealing they are pretty much at their
limit N/A................
Do you have a source for this information? Heard the same thing with the 4.0L mustang yet I know a lot of FI 4.0L guys and no issues...
scrming is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
All this talk about forced induction got me thinking... TheClassicCarKid Forced Induction - V8 23 07-20-2009 07:44 AM
Horsepower gains. Silver Streak Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 13 01-14-2009 09:51 AM
New to Forced Induction? Gale Banks talks about FI (Boost). GTAHVIT Forced Induction - V8 19 08-24-2008 07:51 PM
Forced Induction Stamm316 4th Generation Camaros 4 04-13-2008 07:47 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:18 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.