Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Roto-Fab
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-09-2014, 02:05 PM   #1
GTKILLER
 
GTKILLER's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Greensboro NC
Posts: 251
Low Dyno Numbers need help

2010 camaro M6 LS3

I got cam installed 233/248 619"/595" on 113LSA with TSP 1 7/8 long-tube headers, ported throttle body and Ported intake.I also installed 150 NX plate nitrous sytem with stand alone fuel system.My car already had 3.91 gears,18'' dragstars with 305 45 18 MT and fastlane cold air intake. Car was Dynoed on mustang dyno on motor 458RWHP/413RWTQ

on 150 shot 594RWHP/634RWTQ

My question are these numbers average on Mustang DYNO? Also what else can I do to get the NA numbers up.Everybody says dyno is a tool but I've seen plenty of cars on here in 490 range with similar bolt ons. Im taking car to local track on Sunday and see what it does in 1/8th. To be contiued......
__________________
Go Hard or Go Home

Last edited by GTKILLER; 07-10-2014 at 06:06 AM.
GTKILLER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2014, 02:52 PM   #2
MightymouseSS
 
Drives: 2011 LS3
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: el paso tx
Posts: 547
Don't get hung up on numbers its the before and after you should look at. I just had a night fury cam installed and I also got some low numbers compared to what everyone usually gets (470/480). My car baselined 400/398 and after the cam I got 455/417. I honestly think the elevation of the shop was a major culprit being @ 5200 compared to seeing other dynos in lower closer to sea level conditions. But after looking around I saw most ppl getting an average of 50/60 rwhp on there cams as well. Run it and see what she does.
__________________
Vararam
Stainless Works Headers
Vmax TB
SLP loudmouth 2
Nightfury Cam
Mike Norris CC
Tuned by Southwest Speed
MightymouseSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2014, 03:02 PM   #3
Destructo09

 
Drives: 2010 CGM Camaro 2SS/LS3
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Raleigh-Durham
Posts: 1,409
You're 3.91 gears may also be contributing to the lower HP reading.

I would imagine most of the dyno numbers quoted on here are also Dynojets instead of Mustangs.
__________________
2010 2SS
BMR 1" Springs
Koni Orange struts/shocks
1LE rear sway bar
SRP Racing Pedals
Hurst Billet short shifter
Square tire/wheel setup
Elite Engineering Catch Can
Stainless Power longtubes/highflow cats
K&N Typhoon CAI
RPM Motorsports of Garner, NC dyno tune (421 RWHP)
Destructo09 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2014, 03:11 PM   #4
MightymouseSS
 
Drives: 2011 LS3
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: el paso tx
Posts: 547
Btw mine was a dynojet. My tuner also said something about his dynojet being stingy cuz his was a awd loaded dyno that gives better real world numbers compared to other dynos that are unloaded or something of that nature. Also im running 91 fuel I know the 93 guys will definitely get better numbers cuz of that as well.
__________________
Vararam
Stainless Works Headers
Vmax TB
SLP loudmouth 2
Nightfury Cam
Mike Norris CC
Tuned by Southwest Speed
MightymouseSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2014, 03:11 PM   #5
GTKILLER
 
GTKILLER's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Greensboro NC
Posts: 251
MightymouseSS im gone test car sunday and im hoping i can get in 6s in 1/8th on nitrous that was my goal in first place. I guess I was jealous of all these 490-500 rwhp on motor dyno graphs with bollt ons that had me little down.
Destructo09 Ryan said the same thing about gears he installed mine.
__________________
Go Hard or Go Home
GTKILLER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2014, 03:14 PM   #6
Ajdin@A2BMotorsport
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2013 Camaro 1SS/1LE
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Waterloo
Posts: 609
My car dynoed 383 Stock and then after 1 7/8 Long Tubes/Catless Leads/3" Exhaust and a 231/234 618 114LSA Cam I got 452whp/425trq, at first I was unhappy with the number but after keeping up with a $250k Benz SLS AMG on the highway im happy with it.
Ajdin@A2BMotorsport is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2014, 03:29 PM   #7
matt55

 
matt55's Avatar
 
Drives: CTS-V
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Raleigh NC
Posts: 1,069
Just for your pice of mind , go to RPM in Garner or Mayhem in Raleigh (dynojet) and do some pulls .
Dynojets *usually* run more consistent from one to another vs mustang dynos.
__________________
10.8@130.8 610 whp, CAI, 2.5, E85, id850 on street tires.
matt55 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2014, 03:43 PM   #8
62nalide


 
62nalide's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 SS
Join Date: May 2013
Location: DFW
Posts: 4,102
Track times and MPH is where you need to focus
62nalide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-09-2014, 04:12 PM   #9
SGOS252382


 
SGOS252382's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: S.W. Florida
Posts: 6,294
Without baseline numbers on that dyno, you could ask them what stock LS3s usually dyno on their dyno. Stock LS3s can dyno anywhere from 345-390 rwhp depending on the dyno.

Beyond that, your track times are your best measure of your car's performance.

Most of the fastest 5th gens (stock vs stock and modded vs modded) are not the dyno queens pulling high numbers.

I've spent enough time in this forum to know which dynoes produce the higher numbers.
SGOS252382 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2014, 05:57 AM   #10
BFASTNOTLAST

 
BFASTNOTLAST's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 SS LS3
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Denver NC
Posts: 1,411
By the spec's it looks like a Tick polluter cam or a BTR stage 4. Either way with such a low TQ number, this is the reason why I did not go this big on my current stick. I bet the graph shows lazy torque below 4000. I have a much smaller cam than yours and it's a freakin stump puller.... Traps 120 on street tires in the heat of the summer.

Unless you have a VVT setup that works like Rhino, the bigger LS3 cams do not work good on the street simply get out performed by a smaller one set up correctly. I'm on cam #3 now with 22,000 miles and I've had big and small. Bigger is not better with this heavy of a car. This is my personal opinion though so take or not. You should really head over to Garner and talk with Ryan at RPM. He will give you good advise.

Good luck..... Keep it small and keep it tight!
__________________
BFASTNOTLAST is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2014, 07:37 AM   #11
Rhino79


 
Rhino79's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS L99/Auto
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Cabot, AR
Posts: 2,827
Yeah, PTV becomes an issue when you get into the mid 230s on the LS3/L92 heads, so sometimes those big cams cant be installed on the centerline it really needs to be at to make power in the middle and down low. A lot of our best LS3 grinds are on 223-228 intake lobes.
Rhino79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2014, 08:44 AM   #12
thahemp
Geek
 
thahemp's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Black LS3
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Derby, KS
Posts: 4,343
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhino79 View Post
Yeah, PTV becomes an issue when you get into the mid 230s on the LS3/L92 heads, so sometimes those big cams cant be installed on the centerline it really needs to be at to make power in the middle and down low. A lot of our best LS3 grinds are on 223-228 intake lobes.
What centerline Ryan? I think mine is 231 on 110 ICL. Intake clearance would disappear pretty quick though if that valve started opening any earlier.
__________________
01000111011011110110111101100100001000000110110001 11010101100011011010110010000001110111011010010111 01000110100000100000011101000110100001101001011100 110010000001101111011011100110010100100001

x = ac97968bd3df8f968c8cd3df998a9c94d3df9c8a918bd3df9c 909c94df8c8a9c949a8dd3df92908b979a8ddf998a9c949a8d d3df8b968b8cd1
x = ~x
thahemp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2014, 08:54 AM   #13
Rhino79


 
Rhino79's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS L99/Auto
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Cabot, AR
Posts: 2,827
110 icl vs say a 108. You'd lose 12-14 thou of intake clearance.
Rhino79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-10-2014, 09:21 AM   #14
thahemp
Geek
 
thahemp's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Black LS3
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Derby, KS
Posts: 4,343
I wonder what the OP's ICL is. I haven't really noticed any missing low end grunt on mine.
__________________
01000111011011110110111101100100001000000110110001 11010101100011011010110010000001110111011010010111 01000110100000100000011101000110100001101001011100 110010000001101111011011100110010100100001

x = ac97968bd3df8f968c8cd3df998a9c94d3df9c8a918bd3df9c 909c94df8c8a9c949a8dd3df92908b979a8ddf998a9c949a8d d3df8b968b8cd1
x = ~x
thahemp is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:30 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.