Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Phastek Performance
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > Camaro Z/28 Forum - Z/28 Specific Topics


View Poll Results: Which Design do you like best?
Flat top plate? 27 64.29%
Top plate with pockets cut out? 15 35.71%
Voters: 42. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-14-2017, 07:50 PM   #1
Moreno1
 
Drives: G5.R
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,377
New Design Camber Plates Poll

EDIT 1-15-17 Hey guys I add a poll at the top of the thread to make it easier to vote. Our desire is to make the best product available to the community. Your reply helps us accomplish our goal. So thank you in advance for the feed back!


Hey guys, we just finished the camber plates for the Gen 6 Camaro. While we were at it, we figured we would also re-engineer our gen 5. There's several benefits to the new design. I will posting more info on our Facebook page once we get a moment. We have over 30 other suspension components in line for production for the 5th gen market, so subscribe for updates.

In the meantime, I wanted to get your thoughts on which ones you guys like best. Thanks for the feedback.

Justin

OPTION 1: Flat top surface

Name:  IMG_6540.jpg
Views: 1001
Size:  191.2 KB


OPTION 2: Machined pockets

Name:  IMG_6541.jpg
Views: 999
Size:  114.8 KB

Sneak peak at our new roller thrust bearing design and housing. This is replacing the previous design with a ball bearing. Much better design to handle loads.

Name:  IMG_6544.jpg
Views: 1124
Size:  170.3 KB


Over a ton of metal waiting to get machined into Gen 5 parts.

Name:  IMG_6543.jpg
Views: 1009
Size:  209.7 KB

Few pics of our gen 6 prototype plates. Already started production. All the parts will be either anodized or nickle plated.

Name:  IMG_6548.jpg
Views: 919
Size:  103.8 KB

These will offer the option of lowering the front a from a 1/4" or 1/2" without losing any travel.

Name:  IMG_6550.jpg
Views: 1079
Size:  137.9 KB

Name:  15723464_873852842717495_7130111884713990408_o.jpg
Views: 1090
Size:  149.5 KB

Last edited by Moreno1; 01-15-2017 at 09:37 AM.
Moreno1 is offline  
Old 01-14-2017, 08:22 PM   #2
D2M
 
D2M's Avatar
 
Drives: Z/28
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: NJ
Posts: 538
Will there be a ride height increase?
D2M is offline  
Old 01-14-2017, 08:29 PM   #3
Moreno1
 
Drives: G5.R
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,377
Quote:
Originally Posted by D2M View Post
Will there be a ride height increase?
This pic is showing the interference when using the factory spring isolator. This is what forced us to raise the ride height 5mm with our last design. The new design will replace the isolator all together thereby allowing us to keep them at factory height.

Name:  IMG_6549 (1).jpg
Views: 1021
Size:  167.8 KB
Moreno1 is offline  
Old 01-14-2017, 08:31 PM   #4
AG1LE


 
AG1LE's Avatar
 
Drives: '14 1LE
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,435
Option 2
AG1LE is offline  
Old 01-14-2017, 08:50 PM   #5
Moreno1
 
Drives: G5.R
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,377
Quote:
Originally Posted by AG1LE View Post
Option 2

Thanks bud! ..... one vote for option 2. Keep the feedback coming guys.
Moreno1 is offline  
Old 01-15-2017, 08:28 AM   #6
bowtieman_racin
 
Drives: 2015 camaro z28
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: ohio
Posts: 91
I like option 1 just looks stronger to me. How much will these be selling for?
bowtieman_racin is offline  
Old 01-15-2017, 09:35 AM   #7
Moreno1
 
Drives: G5.R
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,377
Quote:
Originally Posted by bowtieman_racin View Post
I like option 1 just looks stronger to me. How much will these be selling for?
Haven't finalized price yet but we are going to be doing a group buy once this bash is completed. Thanks for the feed back!
Moreno1 is offline  
Old 01-15-2017, 09:38 AM   #8
Moreno1
 
Drives: G5.R
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,377
Hey guys I add a poll at the top of the thread to make it easier to vote. Our desire is to make the best product available to the community. Your reply helps us accomplish our goal. So thank you in advance for the feed back!
Moreno1 is offline  
Old 01-15-2017, 09:54 AM   #9
bowtieman_racin
 
Drives: 2015 camaro z28
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: ohio
Posts: 91
thanks I will be watching for the sale. I believe the flat would be better and voted that way because I believe all of those extra holes will just collect dust and dirt for the guys that clean under the hood means more work.

Do you guys sell any rear solid sub frame bushings for the z28
bowtieman_racin is offline  
Old 01-15-2017, 12:28 PM   #10
Avalnch

 
Avalnch's Avatar
 
Drives: Rally Yellow Camaro+Avalanche
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,110
Option 1.
Keep them solid and strong.
__________________
Vengeance Kaotik Cam, C.A.I., ARH LT, Pypes Cat Back, ZL1 Shifter+2012LS3VERT bushing, Quantum Brake Ducts, JDP Tow Hook Scorch Yellow Trim Kit, Shark Fin, AAC DRLs+ABLs+SMDs, ZTA Rear Spoiler, R.Y. 1LE Splitter. Pfadt coilovers, camber plates, trailing arms, Pegasus Solid Subframe. Pedders ZL1 barz, radius arm & steering rack bushings. BMR adjustable toe-rods. Hotchkis Max Chassis Brace. ZL1 GMPP Driveline Upgrade. TurnOne P/S pump. CTS-V 6 pistons.
447 HP @ 6180 RPM / 418 TQ @ 5100 RPM
Avalnch is offline  
Old 01-15-2017, 01:57 PM   #11
AG1LE


 
AG1LE's Avatar
 
Drives: '14 1LE
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,435
Can I change my answer?
AG1LE is offline  
Old 01-15-2017, 04:49 PM   #12
D2M
 
D2M's Avatar
 
Drives: Z/28
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: NJ
Posts: 538
Flat top with new style roller bearing to eliminate the ride height increase. Or offer a roller bearing conversion kit for existing camber plates.
D2M is offline  
Old 01-15-2017, 05:07 PM   #13
Moreno1
 
Drives: G5.R
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 2,377
All good points! thanks for the feedback guys

We have done stress analysis on both models and they have shown that stress concentrates around the bolt holes. They do not take any suspension loads, only bolt torque load from clamping the strut tower. While the first design is definitely stronger overall, both designs are comfortably under the yield point in the pocket areas!

The dust/dirt concern is a good point! taking these all into consideration!
Moreno1 is offline  
Old 01-15-2017, 08:19 PM   #14
olblue75


 
olblue75's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Clarksville Tennesse.
Posts: 6,064
Not just for the Z28 right???
__________________
Orange Krush II
1LE Front sway bar, Splitter, shocks and struts, Z28 dual mode mufflers, Intake, UCA Bushings, and Toresen 3.91 Diff. 1 piece DSS Drive Shaft, ZL1/C7 Calipers, and 32mm JPSS Rear Bar. ASC race spec splitter and wicker. 6th Gen M017 Wheels. Stainless Works 1 7/8 LTs. DSE and PAFDT Suspension components.
olblue75 is online now  
 
Closed Thread


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.