Baseline 1LE Dyno thread

[MRREVINTO7]

http://youtu.be/b12BLFDVQDg For those that don't know what the trunion bearing upgrade is here ya go ..its a must do if you want some high rpm big cam setup it did this with a c5r timing gear and and chain set and a melling high volume oil pump with titanium up grade springs and retainers and forged push rods also went 3 bolt cam instead of stock 1 bolt ..if any of you do a cam vengeance sells the complete kit with all included for some where in 1400 dollar range may as well not half step if your gonna do it it also included all new gm gaskets and the cam the spring I used wer included also with brian tooley dual prints with titanium locks / retainers

[robburk6]

I know this is an old thread, I just had my 2013 1LE with cai, let's and cat delete back to factory npp mufflers and my #'s on the Dynojet were 397 hp and 396 torque.

[weSS1LEy]

408 stock, 421 tune, 464/474 headers, cai,

[Mgizzle]

Originally Posted by weSS1LEy

408 stock, 421 tune, 464/474 headers, cai,

At the wheels?! What dyno?

[Superman09]

I have a rotofab CAI, Bo White TB, 1 7/8 headers with off road midpipes to NPP mufflers, and I just made 435/426 on a mustang dyno.

[weSS1LEy]

Dyno dynamics corrected to dynojet numbers. I've seen other cars and they seem right. Two ls7 around 471-475

[ThisGuyDrives]

Originally Posted by weSS1LEy

Dyno dynamics corrected to dynojet numbers. I've seen other cars and they seem right. Two ls7 around 471-475

Something just doesn't seem right here. I've only seen number sclose to that without a custom cam. I've definitely never seen those numbers stock. At a 10% drivetrain loss that's almost 450 at the crank. With a 15% loss that's 470! With those simple boltons it's 533! We really don't see a problem here?

[Buschman]

Originally Posted by ThisGuyDrives

Something just doesn't seem right here. I've only seen number sclose to that without a custom cam. I've definitely never seen those numbers stock. At a 10% drivetrain loss that's almost 450 at the crank. With a 15% loss that's 470! With those simple boltons it's 533! We really don't see a problem here?

Everyone sees the problem. No one with any sense really cares to say anything.

[X25]

Originally Posted by Buschman

Everyone sees the problem. No one with any sense really cares to say anything.

Since the stock reading is also very high, if we use that as the relative basis for 426 HP, 464/408*426 = 484 crank HP, which is within expectations with header and tune. It's a high reading (misleading) dyno, but at least its stock numbers were also high, so it doesn't look like after dyno numbers are massaged different compared to stock numbers.

[weSS1LEy]

My last thread was " opinions on my hp numbers " because I am skeptical as well. The thing is that a lot of 1le are dynoing above 400 stock. There are threads about this. I will try and get on a different dyno this spring.

[weSS1LEy]

Also my tuner was surprised because another camaro dynoed significantly lower. If it's the dyno then all cars should be high. This is not the case.

[SSmitch]

385.75 RWHP 100% stock/DYNOJET (just over 1K miles on odometer)

[Mrbowtie26]

386/386 on Jannetty racing dyno with about 400 miles on the car. After my LSA install with full exhaust no cats lt headers, CAI, 65lb injectors and stage 1pd cam car then dyno'd 640/576 on the same dyno

[CreeperRS]

100% stock. On 03/20/15, Mustang Dynamoteter. 347 RWTQ, 354 RWHP.
357 RWTQ, 370 RWHP with Z/28 intake!