Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Roto-Fab
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > Camaro ZL1 Forum - ZL1 Specific Topics


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-20-2015, 10:46 AM   #1
cdjnight
 
cdjnight's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 ZL1 A6
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Council Bluffs, Iowa
Posts: 266
Tripple pass heat exchanger

Here's my latest invention...haven't tested yet. I also have to design my mounts yet.
Attached Images
  
__________________
cdjnight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2015, 05:53 PM   #2
Bigtime53


 
Bigtime53's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 ZL1
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 2,298
WELLLLL, I am skeptical but let us know how it turns out.
Bigtime53 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2015, 08:17 PM   #3
cdjnight
 
cdjnight's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 ZL1 A6
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Council Bluffs, Iowa
Posts: 266
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigtime53 View Post
WELLLLL, I am skeptical but let us know how it turns out.
The tanks are oversized for more capacity without having to use an extra tank. It has 5.3L capacity.
__________________
cdjnight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2015, 08:51 PM   #4
Redlineviper

 
Redlineviper's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 ZL1
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Orlando
Posts: 936
The holding capacity is a small part of the equation. While it won't hurt to have more capacity the primary gain will be heat transfer. A larger holding capacity in itself will just take 15 minutes to heat to what ever temp the heat exchanger can disapate rather than 10. Surface area and air flow are going to be the biggest factors to increase thermal improvements.
__________________
2013 A6 ZL1
Redlineviper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2015, 11:02 PM   #5
cdjnight
 
cdjnight's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 ZL1 A6
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Council Bluffs, Iowa
Posts: 266
Quote:
Originally Posted by Redlineviper View Post
The holding capacity is a small part of the equation. While it won't hurt to have more capacity the primary gain will be heat transfer. A larger holding capacity in itself will just take 15 minutes to heat to what ever temp the heat exchanger can disapate rather than 10. Surface area and air flow are going to be the biggest factors to increase thermal improvements.
I designed it with a 2.5" thick core, and the triple pass to remove as much heat as possible. Getting even coolant flow through a single pass radiator is very difficult. And can easily be seen with thermal imaging. I plan to borrow a thermal camera to illustrate the differences between the two.

Besides adding capacity to lengthen the time before total heat soak, my goal was to design a part that eliminates spending $1000 on two different parts. When I can spend $500 on one part and do the same thing. Or in this case I think it has more capacity then having a separate resivoir and after market exchanger.
__________________
cdjnight is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.