Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > V8 LT1 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


Phastek Performance


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-15-2016, 12:00 PM   #1
BadBowtieProductions
Check me out on YouTube!
 
BadBowtieProductions's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: STL
Posts: 160
Arrow Back to back test: Cold Air Inductions cold air intake

TL;DR: It’s worth it in my book. Probably ~10-15whp

VIDEO: https://youtu.be/k3OXHQ7qrtE

I will try to be as thorough as possible, which means this is going to be a lengthy post, so if you would like the abbreviated version, please watch the video.

MY CAR:
2SS, 8 speed auto, sunroof, leather, pretty much every option but MRC. I rolled 8,400 miles on the way to the track. The car is 100% the way it rolled off of the showroom floor, except for tint. The stock tires are toast. The track announced this last day just a few days before the actual event, so I didn’t have time to get the new tires on.

BACKGROUND:
I would like to preface this with a little background. There have been a few reviews out there of this intake, mostly dyno results that have showed virtually zero net gains. This has happened with a few other intakes as well, and it seems to mostly be on the 8 speeds. I will openly admit that this let some doubt into my mind of whether the intake would show any gains at all, but as always, dynos are not real world experience, close to it but not the same. As of this post, I am not aware of another person that has done this back to back test at the track. I still might do the back to back test on the dyno, but this test gave me enough confidence in saying the intake definitely gives some gains.

I received an intake from Cold Air Inductions a little over a month ago, but didn’t even have time to crack the box open because of work and some wedding I’ve been a part of. All this meant I had 1 final day at the track to complete my back to back test. My home track is Gateway Motorsports Park in St. Louis (technically Madison, IL) and we ran this past Saturday, November 12th.

PRE-INSTALL/STOCK TESTING:
I went to the track with the intake in the trunk, ready to be swapped over. I really wanted to hit my personal goal of 11.999 100% stock before swapping it on, but I also wanted to make sure I had time to do the test. I wanted to do it as scientifically as possible so I had a good sample size to make the comparison. I’ve made probably 20-30 passes in the car, playing with all different launch techniques and any and every combination of traction control settings, so I feel like I have a decent handle on how the car performs and how to launch it.

Pass #1- 12.032 @ 116.54 (-402 DA) SLIP
Pass #2- 12.017 @ 117.87 (-368 DA) SLIP
Pass #3- 11.995 @ 117.72 (-342 DA) SLIP

After that 11.99 pass, I was stoked about hitting my goal, and ready to throw the intake on. I was also there with some friends and doing some testing and video with them, so I parked the car so I could go video a few friends chasing 8s and one chasing 7s. He made a few passes, and then we went back to throw the intake on.

INSTALL:
Just to reiterate, I went to the track with the box still unopened. I had no idea what tools I needed, how it would fit, etc. After making the final stock pass, we ripped open the box. Packed nice and snug to stay safe, always a good sight, as are the little extras they throw in. Pulled everything out of the box, and we had everything we needed. I will say that we never open the instructions, so I can’t speak to if they are well done or not. What I can say is that it was very straightforward with no “what do we do with this” parts. I would think any novice could put this on relatively quickly. Even if it was your first ever try at installing parts, you could do this in 30 minutes with the right tools, no question.

What you need:
  • 2.5mm Allen
  • 3.0mm Allen
  • T20 Torx bit
  • 10mm socket
  • Flathead screwdriver
  • Pliers
Pretty straight forward install, I won’t cover that in depth [If you want a video of the install, Sledgehammer did a great job in this video]. Pop the stock intake off (TB will need to come off for the whistle fix), move the MAF from the stock intake to the CAI unit, then put everything back on, starting from the TB and finishing with the filter and sealed box.

POST-INSTALL TESTING:
The DA had now climbed a bit, so I was didn’t know if the gains would be much. Once the install was complete, we turned the car on to make sure there were no Check Engine lights, and revved it up to hear the new sound ?.
What I have seen in back to back dyno tests is people saying that they gave the car no time to learn the intake, and maybe that was the cause for low/no gains. I wanted to test this for sure to prove or disprove that. My car had virtually no time to learn the intake; I literally drove from my parking spot, sat in line for maybe 2 minutes with the car on, and then was doing my burnout.

I used LC to be sure it was a clean pass, and sure enough it was. As I mentioned, I have done 20-30 passes in the car stock, and gaining ANY time was pretty much solely dependent on the weather at this point. When the DA drops, my ET follows suit; when the DA goes up, so does my ET (assuming a clean launch). I immediately noticed it sounds VERY “throaty” with a deep sound from intake. Grabbed my slip and…boom! 11.91! That’s a .08 gain right off the bat with the DA getting 134 points worse. I made a few backup passes as well.

PASS #4- 11.919 @ 117.82 (-211 DA) SLIP
PASS #5- 11.948 @ 117.03 (-226 DA) SLIP
PASS #6- 11.932 @ 117.81 (-301 DA) SLIP

So let’s look at the data…
Stock average: 12.015 @ 117.38 (-370 DA)
CAI average: 11.933 @ 117.55 (-246 DA)

Best to best comparison: 0.076 quicker ET, 0.10 faster MPH, while the DA got worse (climbed 131 points):
Marker-.... STOCK - CAI - COMMENTS
60’-.............1.835 - 1.837 - Slightly slower on the CAI launch
330’-...........5.122 - 4.955 - CAI already making up time
1/8 ET-.......7.790 - 7.735 - gap growing
1/8 MPH-....91.64 - 92.28 - +1 MPH for the intake
1/4 ET- ......11.995 - 11.919 - just shy of a full tenth
1/4 MPH-....117.72 - 117.82 - stock intake gaining some MPH
DA-.............(-342) - (-211) - decent difference in DA, worse for the CAI

Here is my previous best slip (12.04 @ 116) from October 27, as well as the CAI average:
*Nov12+Oct27 average: 12.021 @ 116.94 (-428 DA)
CAI average: 11.933 @ 117.55 (-246 DA)
*note- had I included my best 3 slips from that night, it would’ve been over a tenth gained.

What I find very interesting is that all 3 bests, Oct 27 stock, Nov 12 stock, and with the CAI, all have the same 60’ (used LC on all 3) and you can see the CAI is gaining quick. Had the DA been exactly the same, and I kept trying for a perfect pass with the intake on, I think a mid 11.8x would have been easily possible. I do find the lack of MPH gain interesting, but when we’re talking about gaining ~10hp, it’s going to be negligible. Had I been able to match my all time best 60' of 1.78, I think things would've got real interesting, but I digress.

Another member here was in attendance with his A8 6th gen, all stock save for the same intake, no tune, he has cloth seats to my leather, and a drag pack with slicks (Racestar fronts and rears, says he lost 100lbs from the wheels and tires), and he ran a best of 11.71 @ 118 that day. I think this backs up my theory even more than it was worth it. His previous best was 12.04 @ 115.

WHAT I COULD’VE DONE BETTER:
In retrospect, I wish I would’ve taken the intake off and make a few more passes just to verify my results even more so and video the install, but oh well. It was a rushed day with everything going on.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION:
I have been driving the car nonstop since the track, and it has not thrown a CEL, nor has it had any hiccups or any negative effects of driving manners. The sound in the car is pretty addictive, sounds much more mean. The piece itself is great quality, and looks fantastic in the engine bay. My friend actually said “damn that looks good” when we finally got it all installed lol.

CONCLUSION
This is where it comes down to opinion based on the HP/$. I won’t post a price of the intake, as that depends on vendor and current sales going on.

-If you want easy, bolt-on horsepower, I would definitely recommend this intake. I feel that the ET it gained with the DA going up proves that it DEFINITIVELY picks up horsepower; I would also say it definitively overrules dyno tests that showed zero gains.
-If you want every last horsepower out of the car, this intake will definitely help get you there.
-If you want a good looking engine bay, with some extra growl in the cabin to go along with some horsepower gains, I would buy this intake.
-If you don’t want to spend a bunch of money on a cold air intake and don’t care about the gains, you have to decide on if the price you are paying is worth it.

WOULD I RECOMMEND IT?
Yes.
__________________
2016 Camaro SS - A8, NPP, 2SS, Nightfall Gray Metallic
11.68 @ 118 - CAI Intake - TSP 2" Longtubes - DSX Tuning Flex Fuel - DSX Tuned
11.91 @ 117 - CAI intake only
11.99 @ 117 - STOCK 1/4 mile
410 RWHP / 424 RWTQ - STOCK Dyno
---
YouTube Channel: BadBowtieProductions
BadBowtieProductions is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2016, 12:09 PM   #2
Richard0nee

 
Richard0nee's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 SS M6, NPP
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Hawthorne, CA
Posts: 1,957
Very nice and informative write up! CAI although don't normally add that much HP/Trq but with racing it could improve ones ET ever so slightly.

Watching Sledge test out the CAI and Mishimoto was somewhat saddening it terms of gains but who knows, maybe heatsoaked played a role, etc.

Wonder what the results would have been if you tested the RotoFab
Richard0nee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2016, 12:10 PM   #3
Padre
Only drives on Sundays
 
Padre's Avatar
 
Drives: '16 2SS A8 NPP MRC NGray
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Dalton, GA
Posts: 2,500
Very nice report.

Padre
__________________

OLD HOTNESS: The "Heretic": '11 2SS/RS L99 A6 Black/Inferno. Build Journal, Videos
D1SC GT9 JBA-LT = 720/680 | 10.330 @ 133.61, 1.546 sixty... Camaro King at ECS V, Darlington.
NEW HOTNESS: '16 2SS A8 NPP MRC. Bone Stock, 1/8th: 8.051 @ 89.44, 1.919
Padre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2016, 12:19 PM   #4
LesBaer
FMPG
 
LesBaer's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 2SS
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: CT
Posts: 1,888
I love your videos on youtube, but therein lies the rub. Everyone is free to make their own decisions, but we live in the age of social media advertising and that's exactly what this is. Even he who shall not be named is now working it with sponsorship deals.
__________________
Ordered 3/8/16- NFG/Ceramic White, M6, MRC, NPP, 6 pots, blk blade, no sunroof, blk splitter, blk bow ties, dark tails, nav.
ARH 1 7/8" ceramic coated full sys w/NPP; Maggie 9.2psi (85mm); Jannetty rough idle cam(TSP), tune and LT4 fuel system; Forgeline VX1 Black PVD (20x10,11); R88R 315's; ALPriority; BMR rear arms, bushings, DS loop; RF intake (red); nGauge

93 octane: 712rwhp, 654rwtq / E85 (E66 mix): 734rwhp, 674rwtq (SuperFlow Dyno)
LesBaer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2016, 12:23 PM   #5
mulletman
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro SS
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: southern Illinois trailer park
Posts: 636
Voldemort drives a Camaro SS?

Last edited by mulletman; 11-15-2016 at 05:28 PM. Reason: Spelling
mulletman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2016, 01:14 PM   #6
Blk16SS
 
Blk16SS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Chevy Camaro
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Dallas,Tx
Posts: 259
I've always had my theory on performance parts that not necessarily "win" on the dyno but shows up on track day. The fact that it's stationary on the dyno as opposed to the ram air affect at 100 mph or so rolling down the track, kinda puts it in the torque converter category. Nothing on the dyno but night and day on the track.
Blk16SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2016, 06:08 PM   #7
oldman


 
Drives: SS 6 speed of course
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Hilo, HI
Posts: 4,320
thanks for the great and detailed review!
__________________
Forged short block, large duration sub .600 lift Cam Motion cam, 7200 RPM fuel cut, Pray Ported Heads, 3.85 pulley D1X, stage II intercooler, DSX secondary low side, DSX E85 sensor, Lingenfelter big bore 2.0 pump, ported front cats, 60608 Borla, LT4 injectors, ZL1 1LE driveshaft and Katech ported TB, ported MSD intake, BTR valvetrain, ARP studs, ProFlow valves, PS4 tires.
oldman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2016, 07:39 PM   #8
streetyme
 
streetyme's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 2SS nav mag ride npp a8
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: St Louis
Posts: 202
Thanks for the very detailed write up on the CAI.. If you don't mind me asking how did you stage for the best time? Just trying to get a understating on what these cars like..
__________________
2016 2SS A8 mag ride npp exhaust nav sunroof Rotofab CAI Borla Atak NPP Corsa X pipe BBS CHR Extreme Contactsport
2.9 Whipple Elite catch can Rotofab Juiced Motorsports installed by STG Motorsports JMS Fuel Maxx
tuned by Gregs Tuning Operation
Weld Laguna 17x10 18x5


2006 mustang gt Magnuson Livernois stage 2 heads stage 2 blower cams dynatech headers 4.10's Circle D convertor 533/511bs) (9.8lbs)
streetyme is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2016, 07:46 PM   #9
laynlo15
 
laynlo15's Avatar
 
Drives: 2022 Lt1 A10
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: clark, mo
Posts: 8,860
I was there and can verify his findings, we know that there is no gain on the dyno but down track it does show performance gains. Mph didn't change much but the Ets past 60 ft all show gains. Congrats
__________________
2022 Lt1 6.2 A10, Maggie 2300, THPSI Port Inj/10 rib, Rotofab, E, Nickey, SCOL, Griptech, RC Bandits, Hoosiers/MT 9.80@142.96 1.44 60ft, 6.34@112 707/669 RWHP/TRQ. 16SS Maggie 2650 9.41@147 1.35 60ft, 5.99@119. 16 C7 A8 10.90@128 Bolt on stuff
laynlo15 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2016, 10:27 AM   #10
BadBowtieProductions
Check me out on YouTube!
 
BadBowtieProductions's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: STL
Posts: 160
Thanks for the kind words everyone! I tried to give every advantage to the stock intake to really see if there were any gains to be had. I think that really proved the point.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard0nee View Post
Very nice and informative write up! CAI although don't normally add that much HP/Trq but with racing it could improve ones ET ever so slightly.

Watching Sledge test out the CAI and Mishimoto was somewhat saddening it terms of gains but who knows, maybe heatsoaked played a role, etc.

Wonder what the results would have been if you tested the RotoFab
In a perfect world, I would've been able to test out all the intakes available. Oh well...some for the 7th gen

I've heard that the lack of gains on the dyno may have something to do with the load/lack thereof on the dyno with the 8 speeds. I will see what mine does, and see what the result is.

Quote:
Originally Posted by LesBaer View Post
I love your videos on youtube, but therein lies the rub. Everyone is free to make their own decisions, but we live in the age of social media advertising and that's exactly what this is. Even he who shall not be named is now working it with sponsorship deals.
Thank you! And you are exactly right, everyone can and should make up their own minds. My information and testing is just one piece in the puzzle for people to make their decisions.

Not sure who you were getting at...maybe PM me?

Quote:
Originally Posted by streetyme View Post
Thanks for the very detailed write up on the CAI.. If you don't mind me asking how did you stage for the best time? Just trying to get a understating on what these cars like..
I was using Launch Control on most every pass. On better prepped days , I've just turned everything off and stomped it. Stalling it up really never made a positive gain any higher than 1500. Things will obviously change next year when the car has a drag radial on it.

Quote:
Originally Posted by laynlo15 View Post
I was there and can verify his findings, we know that there is no gain on the dyno but down track it does show performance gains. Mph didn't change much but the Ets past 60 ft all show gains. Congrats
I figured the MPH was always going to be negligible, as it was, but being able to get those immediate gains really proved my point.

Good to meet you again, glad to finally put a name with a face! Hopefully I can keep up with you next year. Flex fuel and tune is my Christmas present to myself.
__________________
2016 Camaro SS - A8, NPP, 2SS, Nightfall Gray Metallic
11.68 @ 118 - CAI Intake - TSP 2" Longtubes - DSX Tuning Flex Fuel - DSX Tuned
11.91 @ 117 - CAI intake only
11.99 @ 117 - STOCK 1/4 mile
410 RWHP / 424 RWTQ - STOCK Dyno
---
YouTube Channel: BadBowtieProductions
BadBowtieProductions is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2016, 11:37 AM   #11
avalonandl

 
avalonandl's Avatar
 
Drives: 2019 ZL-1
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Troy, MI & Naples, FL
Posts: 2,019
Which CAI did you use. It looks like the GM Performance Parts CAI but this was not specified?

I also think that Roto Fabs comments are excellent. The "learning process" may change the out come after a month or so.
avalonandl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2016, 11:45 AM   #12
jdasnt3

 
jdasnt3's Avatar
 
Drives: 18 Silverado 1500
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Bradenton, FL
Posts: 1,721
Quote:
Originally Posted by avalonandl View Post
Which CAI did you use. It looks like the GM Performance Parts CAI but this was not specified?

I also think that Roto Fabs comments are excellent. The "learning process" may change the out come after a month or so.
ColdAirInductions... and yes, it just might be the exact brand that GM chose to sell.
__________________
16 Red Hot 2SS A8: NPP, CAI Cold air, Ported TB, Fasterproms Ported intake, E85 flex, Formatto tuned. 11.80@118 with 1.92 60' (600-700 DA) on stock run flats.
jdasnt3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2016, 12:12 PM   #13
EFI Tuning
 
EFI Tuning's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Mount Dora, FL
Posts: 792
Always log if you can on tests like this. When the deltas are relatively small the ECM data really helps to understand what is happening.
EFI Tuning is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-16-2016, 12:15 PM   #14
Megahurtz
Snackbar Tuning
 
Megahurtz's Avatar
 
Drives: 2023 SGM ZL1
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,114
If you happen to do anymore testing at the track it would be great if you had a wideband installed and could log all of the runs.
Megahurtz is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.