Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Phastek Performance
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-20-2008, 09:46 AM   #15
MajorTom
 
MajorTom's Avatar
 
Drives: 2005 Pontiac GTO
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 306
Yeah, I've heard the GT500s are rated at 3900 pounds. Add a driver and you're over 2 tons. But to be fair, a lot of suspension enhancements and a larger engine with an iron block instead of an aluminum one will do that.
MajorTom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2008, 09:59 AM   #16
greenrail
Comic Curmudgeon
 
greenrail's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS-2010 VW CC Sport
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Near Chicago, IL
Posts: 2,395
I have to chime in here. This whole endless saga of people complaining about weight is getting a bit tiresome.

Wait until you drive the car. Consider the requirements under which it has been built. This isn't 1967, 1970,1982, 1993 , or even 2002.

The world has changed. If you feel the car is too heavy and nothing will change your mind, then exercise your right to not buy the car. The manufacturers won't be going back to 1967. It isn't practical and it isn't something which the buying public would accept.
__________________
Member Illinois Camaro Club
His Name is Rosie - "Speak Softly and Carry a Big Stick!" - If you know who said that, then you know the genesis of his name.
greenrail is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2008, 10:31 AM   #17
4thGen
 
Drives: 2005 Chevrolet Cobalt LS
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Indiana
Posts: 141
Quote:
Originally Posted by greenrail View Post
I have to chime in here. This whole endless saga of people complaining about weight is getting a bit tiresome.

Wait until you drive the car. Consider the requirements under which it has been built. This isn't 1967, 1970,1982, 1993 , or even 2002.

The world has changed. If you feel the car is too heavy and nothing will change your mind, then exercise your right to not buy the car. The manufacturers won't be going back to 1967. It isn't practical and it isn't something which the buying public would accept.


It's not like it weighs the same as a semi. It weighs less than 4000lbs. A lot of time has put into the suspension and handling. It's not going to be some crappy car. IRS adds weight, safety features add weight. It's part of the luxury. It's gotta be a lot more comfortable on the road than the Mustang.
4thGen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2008, 10:38 AM   #18
MajorTom
 
MajorTom's Avatar
 
Drives: 2005 Pontiac GTO
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 306
And honestly it's not like the cars from the 60s weighed much less. From what I read, a 70 challenger weighed about 3800-3900 pounds. So in 38 years it gained 300 pounds.


The gripe is that cars like the Mustang and the Camaro weighed in around 3400 pounds about 6 years ago. It's quite a change. I'll buy an SS with a stick. 3850 pounds isn't too bad and it'll smoke it's competition in most aspects of performance despite it's weight. And with pedders suspension improvements it'll do even better.
MajorTom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2008, 10:56 AM   #19
rolnslo
Rolling along...
 
rolnslo's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 2SS/RS SGM
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 4,380
I guess I'm looking at this weight issue differently than most. My truck that I've been driving for 9 years weighs in at about 5400 lbs empty when I'm leaving the dump. 3700-3800 lbs for the Camaro is going to handle light years better than my truck. I drive my truck like it's a sports car so I better be more careful once I'm driving my Camaro.
rolnslo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2008, 11:59 AM   #20
gladiatoro
 
gladiatoro's Avatar
 
Drives: 1981 Z28 Camaro
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Kelowna B.C Canada
Posts: 307
A current MUSTANG GTweighs 3500 pounds roughly that's 400 pounds roughly LESS than the new CAMARO SS but that being said the 2010 Stang I think will weigh a bit more due to new safety regulations bigger Motor etc... still I think it will be at least 200 pounds lighter than the SS since they will be using the same Lincoln LS platform..
gladiatoro is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
will curb weight change your buying decision? mprhead5 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 114 04-16-2010 11:55 AM
weight loss CamaroSpike23 Off-topic Discussions 8 09-17-2009 07:16 PM
5th Gen Camaro curb weight updates. Sticky thread? TT C6 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 130 10-16-2008 02:03 PM
Curb weight for new Camaro? topgun1 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 5 06-06-2008 10:05 PM
Camaro Weight JeepinMatt 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 62 03-26-2008 09:17 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.