05-02-2009, 10:49 AM | #1 |
Drives: 1969 & 2016 Camaro SS Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,849
|
Drag Test: 2010 Camaro SS
We had the keys to a new Camaro SS yesterday, as well as a track all to ourselves. Enjoy!
http://www.planetlsx.com/news/Drag_T...0_Camaro_SS/74 Planet LSX track tests the new 2010 Camaro SS Has the recent introduction of the new 2010 Camaro left you wondering how it might perform at the drag strip? Sure, we've seen other magazines post up results using GPS type tracking equipment, but we know our Planet LSX readers won't settle for high tech gizmos to record actual dragstrip results. Being the gearheads we are, we decided to take a brand new Camaro and romp it down the track to learn both the good and bad. We picked up the phone to our friends over at Hennessey Motorsports, located in Sealy, TX. We learned that they were one of the first to take possession of a 2K10 SS, and this shop also benefits from having its very own dragstrip on site. Track conditions were fair, about 88 degrees outside and humid. Headwind was 10-15 mph, track prep was excellent. Camaro SS weighs in at portly 3,850 lbs without the driver. We found that the Camaro was difficult to launch effectively, too little throttle resulted in bog, and too much throttle induced some terrible wheelhop. Bogging seemed to get slightly better results, due to maintaining traction. Clutch engagement was high on the pedal travel, but worked well. The TR6060 manual transmission shifted flawlessly, just like our test 2009 Z06. Even when maintaining a smooth launch, the best 60-foot times only resulted in a paltry 2.1 second range. Those rear tires on the Camaro are nearly 29" tall, and look very heavy. No doubt some of that curb appeal that they are intended for are hurting track performance. A set of drag radials would work wonders for netting a better launch. Going down the track, you could feel some slight torque management in 1st gear, as if the throttle did not go wide open until 2nd gear. All passes were made with traction control off, electing to use driver (right foot) traction control instead. The Camaro only uses the first three gears to get down the quarter-mile, coming just under redline as you cross the traps. Our best pass was a 13.51 @ 107 mph, with a weak 2.1 sixty foot time. The car would easily be a high-12 to low-13 car in better conditions, with a decent launch. To be fair, our test car was never allowed to cool down, we did more hot laps than a NASCAR. The 2010 Camaro SS was great fun, and we enjoyed our thrash of it. The car embodies exactly what a pony car should be. Nice exhaust note, sporty handling, aggressive stance and body, as well as decent track performance. We also realize that our readers are looking at this car like a blank canvass, eager to dig into that LS3 engine and get even more power out of it. We can't wait to do this ourselves here at Planet LSX!
__________________
Fquick.com/NineBall
|
05-02-2009, 10:52 AM | #2 |
Okie doke
|
Im really disapointed in the times and MPH that people other than the magazines are getting ... they are about the same as my 2001 SS with just a lid and a good 4 -6 MPH off of the 03/04 cobras ...
Crowley
__________________
|
05-02-2009, 11:00 AM | #3 |
Force RECON
Drives: 2005 Saab 9-5 2.3T Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Terre Haute, IN
Posts: 1,687
|
Random thought. Is it just me, or does the SS sit kinda high in the front?
BTW, this is my new background . This picture is beauiful
__________________
|
05-02-2009, 11:04 AM | #4 |
Reality Check Specialist
|
I think its Hennessey's car... its not broken in yet and its probably been romped on pretty hard in the first few miles of its life... and God knows what Hennessey's shop guys have been doing to it since they got it.
btw, Tony, the wife still loves the Osiris rims... you were right when you said that once we got them on the black car, we'd never take them off... lol |
05-02-2009, 11:16 AM | #5 | |
Drives: 2016 Camaro SS - A8, MRC, NPP Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: DE
Posts: 549
|
Quote:
|
|
05-02-2009, 11:32 AM | #6 |
Drives: 2016 Z06, 2015 Hellcat Challenger, Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: LONG ISLAND,NEW YORK
Posts: 658
|
Its a 2SS and I always thought they would be slower than the barebones 1SS that the mags tested because it is a heavier car.
__________________
|
05-02-2009, 11:50 AM | #7 |
Drives: 2004 Silver Met BMW 330i ZHP Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Posts: 46
|
"Our best pass was a 13.51 @ 107 mph, with a weak 2.1 sixty foot time. The car would easily be a high-12 to low-13 car in better conditions, with a decent launch. To be fair, our test car was never allowed to cool down, we did more hot laps than a NASCAR."
not bad...
__________________
FLAWLS3
|
05-02-2009, 02:10 PM | #8 |
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: S.W. Florida
Posts: 6,294
|
Interesting to hear they had wheel hop issues with the 6 speed manual. I thought that problem with the IRS had been all worked out (they learned their lesson from the manual GTO).
My 6 speed manual GTO had terrible wheel hop issues (before I learned how to launch the car properly - knee jerk launch (at a constant rpm) without flooring the gas until the car was already moving off the line). My A4 automatic GTO has never given me any wheel hop issues. |
05-02-2009, 02:17 PM | #9 |
Drives: 18 ZL1 A10 Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: South East, FL
Posts: 3,024
|
Hmmm, GM said it was fixed. Testing says it's THERE.
I bet the testers are lying. GM would never lie to us. -bobby
__________________
2017 ZL1 M6 Bog City, 2013 ZL1 M6, 2010 2SS M6
ZL1::J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS |
05-02-2009, 02:20 PM | #10 |
Drives: 2016 Z06, 2015 Hellcat Challenger, Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: LONG ISLAND,NEW YORK
Posts: 658
|
That was pretty funny
__________________
|
05-02-2009, 02:41 PM | #11 |
Drives: 2010 Hyundai Genesis Coupe 2.0T Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Mission, BC
Posts: 863
|
|
05-02-2009, 02:44 PM | #12 |
Drives: 2014 Z/28 #82+#192, 18ZLE 66Nova Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: By the lake in AZ
Posts: 15,719
|
No not GM, Lie to us not in a million no 54 billion years.
|
05-02-2009, 03:10 PM | #13 | |
Ancalagon The Black
Drives: 2013 Silverado 4X4, 2010 RJT 1SS Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Upstate - NY
Posts: 901
|
Quote:
Give the after market a year and someone will offer rear end gears that will trade in some of that high end speed for short distance times. |
|
05-02-2009, 03:12 PM | #14 | |
Drives: 18 ZL1 A10 Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: South East, FL
Posts: 3,024
|
Quote:
=Bobby
__________________
2017 ZL1 M6 Bog City, 2013 ZL1 M6, 2010 2SS M6
ZL1::J-E-T-S JETS JETS JETS |
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Camaro Product Manager - interview | Moose | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 11 | 04-04-2012 06:10 PM |
Camaro 2010 SS First 1/4 Mile Test | theshadow1234 | Camaro Photos | Spyshots | Video | Media Gallery | 73 | 04-24-2009 07:59 PM |
Car and Driver Review: SS V8 Short Take Road Test | Tran | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 25 | 03-24-2009 06:00 PM |
Edmunds Inside Line Review - Road Tests 2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS ONLINE! | Supermans | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 77 | 03-23-2009 09:15 AM |
2010 Camaro SS vs Base Porsche 911? | ihc95 | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 104 | 09-28-2008 04:14 PM |