Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Jason 98 TA
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Members Area > General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-03-2010, 02:40 PM   #15
Stew


 
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by matt55 View Post
Doubt it

On a REAL Dynojet graph (not a made up one) the 392 made 420 WHP SAE (
)

I would like to see a vid or a Dynojet print out of this
WHat makes one real and one not?
Stew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2010, 04:23 PM   #16
assasinator
1 n the head,2 n da chest
 
assasinator's Avatar
 
Drives: 2002 cadillac deville
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: huntsville al.
Posts: 659
if they make 452rwhp broken in like that, they make around.....510-530hp.


neither ford nor chevy has an answer for that. and it in fact will run low 12's stock. just like a gt500. it will make more than a 2007-2009 gt500.


the GT and SS are at the back.
__________________
2011GT E85, Kooks 1-7/8", 3" offroad X, 2-7/8" overaxles, Roush mufflers, CobraJet intake, SCJ monoblade throttle body, drew 4.5" CAI, Boss302S exhaust valve springs, Baby CobraJet exhaust cams. 3.73 gears, lightweight 300A. 455rwhp @7800/410rwtq SAE 5000lb roller dynojet
assasinator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2010, 04:24 PM   #17
assasinator
1 n the head,2 n da chest
 
assasinator's Avatar
 
Drives: 2002 cadillac deville
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: huntsville al.
Posts: 659
you guys need to remember when it was said a stock 5.0 couldnt make 390rwhp broken in stock. some have. this is the same thing. some 392's WILL if this isnt a lie. expect it. i do now.
__________________
2011GT E85, Kooks 1-7/8", 3" offroad X, 2-7/8" overaxles, Roush mufflers, CobraJet intake, SCJ monoblade throttle body, drew 4.5" CAI, Boss302S exhaust valve springs, Baby CobraJet exhaust cams. 3.73 gears, lightweight 300A. 455rwhp @7800/410rwtq SAE 5000lb roller dynojet
assasinator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2010, 07:13 PM   #18
THE EVIL TW1N
Banned
 
Drives: 2003 Cobra Convertible
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 2,925
Quote:
Originally Posted by assasinator View Post
you guys need to remember when it was said a stock 5.0 couldnt make 390rwhp broken in stock. some have. this is the same thing. some 392's WILL if this isnt a lie. expect it. i do now.
i think theyll dyno 430rwhp on average.
THE EVIL TW1N is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2010, 08:55 PM   #19
8cd03gro


 
Drives: 2005 STi corn fed
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,998
We'll see. Seems a little farfetched from the 111 trap speeds we saw from the one that hit the track, but that is just one car. It's possible.
8cd03gro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2010, 09:46 PM   #20
Sleestack
 
Sleestack's Avatar
 
Drives: '07 SRT8 SuperBee, '09 GT500
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 684
Quote:
Originally Posted by 8cd03gro View Post
We'll see. Seems a little farfetched from the 111 trap speeds we saw from the one that hit the track, but that is just one car. It's possible.
Other test times are trickling in. 114MPH trap is your other data point.

C/D TEST RESULTS:
Zero to 60 mph: 4.5 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 10.2 sec
Zero to 130 mph: 16.3 sec
Zero to 150 mph: 24.7 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 12.9 sec @ 114 mph
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...take_road_test
__________________
Sleestack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2010, 09:55 PM   #21
THE EVIL TW1N
Banned
 
Drives: 2003 Cobra Convertible
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 2,925
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sleestack View Post
Other test times are trickling in. 114MPH trap is your other data point.

C/D TEST RESULTS:
Zero to 60 mph: 4.5 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 10.2 sec
Zero to 130 mph: 16.3 sec
Zero to 150 mph: 24.7 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 12.9 sec @ 114 mph
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...take_road_test
That 114mph seems more like it and inline with a 420-430rwhp car with a 4400lbs raceweight
THE EVIL TW1N is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2010, 10:05 PM   #22
Legend
Hello!
 
Legend's Avatar
 
Drives: 2008 JSB Z06!
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,624
Little high...but none the less an awesome car and engine.
Legend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2010, 10:09 PM   #23
8cd03gro


 
Drives: 2005 STi corn fed
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,998
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sleestack View Post
Other test times are trickling in. 114MPH trap is your other data point.

C/D TEST RESULTS:
Zero to 60 mph: 4.5 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 10.2 sec
Zero to 130 mph: 16.3 sec
Zero to 150 mph: 24.7 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 12.9 sec @ 114 mph
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...take_road_test
Ah, there we go. That seems more realistic when considering the power numbers it's putting down. I'm still skeptical about how that first car pulled off a 12.4 on street tires with only a 111 trap speed. I'd like to find out what the 60' was. . . No doubt this car is pretty bad ass though.
8cd03gro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2010, 10:22 PM   #24
Sleestack
 
Sleestack's Avatar
 
Drives: '07 SRT8 SuperBee, '09 GT500
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 684
Quote:
Originally Posted by 8cd03gro View Post
Ah, there we go. That seems more realistic when considering the power numbers it's putting down. I'm still skeptical about how that first car pulled off a 12.4 on street tires with only a 111 trap speed. I'd like to find out what the 60' was. . . No doubt this car is pretty bad ass though.
The timeslip for the 12.4 run is below. 1.8 is a very good time for street tires.

__________________
Sleestack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2010, 10:38 PM   #25
8cd03gro


 
Drives: 2005 STi corn fed
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,998
A 1.82 with stock IRS and stock tires. . . eh, I don't know about that. Has it been confirmed that it was on stock tires?
8cd03gro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2010, 10:42 PM   #26
Sleestack
 
Sleestack's Avatar
 
Drives: '07 SRT8 SuperBee, '09 GT500
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 684
Quote:
Originally Posted by 8cd03gro View Post
A 1.82 with stock IRS and stock tires. . . eh, I don't know about that. Has it been confirmed that it was on stock tires?
The claim all is stock. I have seen a few stock 6.1's run 1.8's.... but that was good conditions, drivers, and great track prep (it is possible). Most stock SRT's run 2.05 to 2.15 60's, nursing it off the line.
__________________
Sleestack is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2010, 10:54 PM   #27
Sawyer


 
Sawyer's Avatar
 
Drives: '13 5.0
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 2,346
I want to see the times it runs with a supercharger and DR's.
__________________
2013 Mustang GT Black M6
Sawyer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-03-2010, 11:02 PM   #28
ViperTomcat
Banned
 
Drives: 2011 Avenger Heat
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,698
Quote:
Originally Posted by 8cd03gro View Post
A 1.82 with stock IRS and stock tires. . . eh, I don't know about that. Has it been confirmed that it was on stock tires?
Yeah, the wheels and tires are stock.
ViperTomcat is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Personal Test drive review: 11 GT vs. 11 2SS vs 10 Challenger R/T ViperTomcat Chevy Camaro vs... 171 07-27-2010 04:42 PM
Challenger Pricing LSxcellent General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 31 12-03-2007 09:00 PM
Ontario to become home of the all-new 2008 Dodge Challenger Mr. Wyndham General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 3 08-09-2007 02:54 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:08 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.