12-17-2013, 12:05 PM | #1 |
|
Injen Long tube vs Cold air inductions
What are your opinions?
CAI: $400 Injen:$240 on autoanything after discount code. I don't need to worry much about hydrolocking since I live in Phoenix so please don't use that as a con for the Injen. Obviously the Injen is quite a bit cheaper, but I'm willing to spend the extra money for better performance, but don't want to overspend if the injen is better or equal.. Thanks!
__________________
2010 Camaro 2SS/RS | 416 LS3 | FED stage 2 heads
|
12-17-2013, 01:32 PM | #2 |
Drives: 2012 IOM 2LT RS A6 w/ BA Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Central Valley, Ca
Posts: 123
|
I am happy with what I spent on my intake.
__________________
ToDones -
Apex Scoop & Washer Relocate - CAI cai - Elite CC - Elite Clean Side Separator - MRT v1 Axle Back customized w/ J-Pipes - Black Out Headlight/Tail Light - Black Out BowTies - Black Out 'camaro' - Black Out Brake Light Chrome Bezel - JL Audio XD400/4 - Sub Thump Sub Box 2 DVC 10"s - HIFONICS ZEUS 1000.1 Escort Redline - VIOFO Dash Cam - Continental Extreme Contact Tires Gary's Customs ZL1 Front Bumper, ZL1 Rockers, & ZL1 Spoiler - Paint matched IOM OverKill 80mm T-body - JacFab Ported Intake Manifold - JacFab Extendolator 3/4" Spacer ToDos - Tune? |
12-17-2013, 01:52 PM | #3 |
|
There is always Roto-FAB intakes and yes they do make a huge difference.
__________________
Specs
TSP Stage 2 Boosted Cam 227/235 at 114 LSA Fore Innovation Triple pump staged (Walbro 342 primary and 2x Walbro 450 secondaries) Procharger D1x with a 3.85 pulley ID1050x Injectors Flex Fuel Sensor Monster LT1 Twin Disk Clutch Holley Sniper Efi Intake Manifold NW 103mm Boosted TB 747rwhp at 12psi on E85 |
12-17-2013, 02:18 PM | #4 |
Drives: 2016 1LT RS Camaro; 72 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Central Point, OR
Posts: 5,688
|
I don't like the idea of having "too much" intake tube... More bends in the tube, and the longer length can cause drag in the airflow... Not saying the Injen is "too much", but personally, it's not for me.
Definitely look at the Roto-Fab intake if you haven't considered it. |
12-17-2013, 02:52 PM | #5 |
|
Cool thanks! Also, if anyone has any other preferences asides from the two I listed, please let me know
__________________
2010 Camaro 2SS/RS | 416 LS3 | FED stage 2 heads
|
12-17-2013, 03:03 PM | #6 |
having FUN now 13.66@101
|
It becomes a matter of what you want to see when you open your hood. For performance the two of those are very close to each other. Here is the HP numbers that were tested a few years ago on the LLT engine.
I also posted what can be done with your INJEN tube to add some of your own taste too.
__________________
|
12-17-2013, 03:13 PM | #7 | |
|
Quote:
I just recently got my LFX tuned by IPF and the guy told me one day they took a bunch of different cold air intakes and dyno'd them with the LFX and that the Airaid had the best gains
__________________
2010 Camaro 2SS/RS | 416 LS3 | FED stage 2 heads
|
|
12-17-2013, 03:18 PM | #8 |
|
Does the "long tube" style really make that much difference? Interested because it is much cheaper than the rest of the options and it seems to get the most gains, and also doesn't seem like bad quality.
__________________
2010 Camaro 2SS/RS | 416 LS3 | FED stage 2 heads
|
12-17-2013, 04:07 PM | #9 |
Drives: '12 2LT Convertible Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Belmont, California
Posts: 1,701
|
Supposedly the z/28 intake is going to be offered by GMPP.
The questions are: 1) When 2) How much?
__________________
Mods: GM Locking Gas Cap, RS License Plate Frame, SS Brembos, ZL1 FrontEnd, 14/15 Convertible Top
|
12-17-2013, 04:22 PM | #10 |
Guest
Drives: bbbbbb Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: bfe
Posts: 713
|
I guess I really can't say which one is the better choice. I went with the Injen short ram intake and I like it. It advertised with about the same added performance as the others but cost a lot less. I did it for the main reason of improving gas mileage which I think it helped to get 1 to 2 more MPG. 2nd reason was the little bit of added performance, it all helps and the more the better. 3rd reason was it was cheaper than the others.
Dean. |
12-17-2013, 04:57 PM | #11 |
|
Oh really? I've been waiting on the veraram intake to be released for the 2012+ but in kinda giving up haha
__________________
2010 Camaro 2SS/RS | 416 LS3 | FED stage 2 heads
|
12-17-2013, 04:58 PM | #12 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
2010 Camaro 2SS/RS | 416 LS3 | FED stage 2 heads
|
|
12-17-2013, 09:02 PM | #13 |
Drives: 2016 1LT RS Camaro; 72 Chevelle Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Central Point, OR
Posts: 5,688
|
|
12-17-2013, 09:19 PM | #14 |
Drives: 2013 Camaro 2LT RS IOM Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Ontario
Posts: 17
|
I've got the BBK for my 2013 no complaints had it for a few months. Mostly chose it because hard to get the CAI up here in Canada. It was either this or the K&N and I much preferred the one piece chrome design of this one. If I were you I would go for the Injen, that's a really great price and performance for almost all the intakes are really close, nothing you would feel anyways.
|
|
|
Tags |
cai inc intake, injen, lfx camaro |
|
|