Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Bigwormgraphix
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Forced Induction - V6


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 11-07-2010, 07:12 PM   #547
KMPrenger


 
KMPrenger's Avatar
 
Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,943
Ok, I get the 1-2 shift thing. It makes sense to me, and about the losing boost between shifts in a manual car....

...but in the first video posted above the ABM got off to what looks to me like a nice launch, but yet the VR Camaro seems to catch him towards the end. Even with the loss of boost during shifts, how in the world did that NA V6 catch the boosted V6?

Could the loss of boost and then trying to spin up the turbos again cause that much power loss while trying to spin em up again?

Sorry, just seems strange.
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!)
KMPrenger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2010, 07:25 PM   #548
usa1camaro1969
Back on the dino-juice
 
usa1camaro1969's Avatar
 
Drives: '10 LS + a few more
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rdditten View Post
Actually, I did give starting in second gear a thought. Hmmm?
You'd be able to launch at a little high RPMs, building more boost off the line. Are you looking at a shift light? When it bounces off the rev limiter it feels like forever until the computer gives control back. I'm at the point where I have to shift to fourth right as I get to the first set of timing lights or bounce off the rev limiter.
__________________
I wake up in the morning and I piss excellence.
-Ricky Bobby
America is all about speed. Hot, nasty, badass speed. -Eleanor Roosevelt, 1936
usa1camaro1969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2010, 07:35 PM   #549
scrming
Red Brick of Vengeance!
 
scrming's Avatar
 
Drives: 12 Second Brick
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: at my pulpit
Posts: 7,745
Quote:
Originally Posted by KMPrenger View Post
Ok, I get the 1-2 shift thing. It makes sense to me, and about the losing boost between shifts in a manual car....

...but in the first video posted above the ABM got off to what looks to me like a nice launch, but yet the VR Camaro seems to catch him towards the end. Even with the loss of boost during shifts, how in the world did that NA V6 catch the boosted V6?

Could the loss of boost and then trying to spin up the turbos again cause that much power loss while trying to spin em up again?

Sorry, just seems strange.
Actually that's rtcat600man's IOM...
scrming is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2010, 07:38 PM   #550
scrming
Red Brick of Vengeance!
 
scrming's Avatar
 
Drives: 12 Second Brick
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: at my pulpit
Posts: 7,745
Quote:
Originally Posted by usa1camaro1969 View Post
You'd be able to launch at a little high RPMs, building more boost off the line. Are you looking at a shift light? When it bounces off the rev limiter it feels like forever until the computer gives control back. I'm at the point where I have to shift to fourth right as I get to the first set of timing lights or bounce off the rev limiter.
Yeah, Rich was telling how long it was taking to recover from hitting the rev limiter...
scrming is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2010, 07:42 PM   #551
KMPrenger


 
KMPrenger's Avatar
 
Drives: 16 Camaro SS, 15 Colorado
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 13,943
Quote:
Originally Posted by scrming View Post
Actually that's rtcat600man's IOM...
Ahhh...OK! Looks nice! I wasn't sure whos that was so I just decided to refer to them as 'ABM' and 'VR'. My bad.
__________________
2016 Camaro 1SS - 8-speed - NPP - Black bowties
2010 Camaro 1LT V6 (Sold. I will miss her!)
KMPrenger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2010, 08:01 PM   #552
Rdditten
 
Rdditten's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 ABM Camaro 2LT RS, STS TURBO
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Breckenridge, Michigan
Posts: 67
Send a message via AIM to Rdditten Send a message via Yahoo to Rdditten
Your right, even spinning the tires, 1st and 2nd I jumped out ahead about a car length each gear, then something went amiss. Take notice of the exhaust. I had hit the limiter and it wouldn't recover. I will be working on it. I feel as I have said the potential is there, I just have to get it all to come together.

Oh, you have a nice color on your car! LOL

Last edited by Rdditten; 11-07-2010 at 08:13 PM.
Rdditten is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2010, 08:13 PM   #553
rtcat600man
having FUN now 13.66@101
 
rtcat600man's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2LT IOM
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Clarkston, Michigan
Posts: 9,230
Quote:
Originally Posted by KMPrenger View Post
Ok, I get the 1-2 shift thing. It makes sense to me, and about the losing boost between shifts in a manual car....

...but in the first video posted above the ABM got off to what looks to me like a nice launch, but yet the VR Camaro seems to catch him towards the end. Even with the loss of boost during shifts, how in the world did that NA V6 catch the boosted V6?

Could the loss of boost and then trying to spin up the turbos again cause that much power loss while trying to spin em up again?

Sorry, just seems strange.

Rich appears to get a great jump on me because he red lighted. Keep in mind if he bounces off the rev limiter on his 1 -2 shift and then again on the 2 -3 shift the race is over at that point. Our Camaro's are going thru the traps in 3rd gear. No time to spool up again.


Quote:
Originally Posted by scrming View Post
Actually that's rtcat600man's IOM...
Thanks Scrming. Correct it is IOM, even thou we know it sometimes appears to be VR.

Quote:
Originally Posted by scrming View Post
Yeah, Rich was telling how long it was taking to recover from hitting the rev limiter...
Rich was even thinking about short shifting, if I remember correctly to help it from bouncing off the rev limiter. Rich was thinking the rev limiter was at 6800 and I was thinking it was 7000 RPM's.
__________________
rtcat600man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2010, 08:15 PM   #554
Rdditten
 
Rdditten's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 ABM Camaro 2LT RS, STS TURBO
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Breckenridge, Michigan
Posts: 67
Send a message via AIM to Rdditten Send a message via Yahoo to Rdditten
Oh, yeah, I did have a -.143 light on that one. I forgot......
Rdditten is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2010, 08:22 PM   #555
rtcat600man
having FUN now 13.66@101
 
rtcat600man's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2LT IOM
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Clarkston, Michigan
Posts: 9,230
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rdditten View Post
Oh, yeah, I did have a -.143 light on that one. I forgot......
NP. I was just pointing out why it looked like a big jump. My reaction time wasn't exactly the best. Still working on that. My 14 run avg. was .308 with one red light and two of them over .5 (guess I was taking a nap).
__________________
rtcat600man is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2010, 08:39 PM   #556
mike25


 
mike25's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Camaro 2SS/RS
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Dubba V
Posts: 2,869
Quote:
Originally Posted by Team STILLEN View Post
A turbocharger is driven by exhaust gas. It takes a certain amount of exhaust energy to drive the exhaust wheel. If you split the total exhaust over two turbochargers, they will be a little less efficient than a single turbo of an equivalent size.

How fast a car comes up on boost has everything to do with the size of the turbocharger wheels. The power a turbocharger, and by design, the engine makes is dependent on the size of turbocharger.

Bigger turbochargers make more power.

Smaller turbochargers make less power.

The smaller turbo will come up faster than a bigger turbo. The more displacement and exhaust energy you have, the quicker the turbo will come up.

Pick a turbocharger by the power you want to make. Build everything else around that. If you want to make 400 hp, the turbocharger will be much smaller than a turbocharger that will support 1000 hp.
agreed. there are benefits to both..a smaller turbo would mean a quicker power band and more fun to drive. bigger turbos mean slower power bands but big power.
__________________
2LT/RS M6 CGM VIN#53104 SOLD

2012 Black 2SS/RS w/ Hurst-

Mods:
Corsa catback, SSE, Vararam
mike25 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2010, 09:07 PM   #557
usa1camaro1969
Back on the dino-juice
 
usa1camaro1969's Avatar
 
Drives: '10 LS + a few more
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by rtcat600man View Post
Rich was even thinking about short shifting, if I remember correctly to help it from bouncing off the rev limiter. Rich was thinking the rev limiter was at 6800 and I was thinking it was 7000 RPM's.
I believe it is 7K.
Any v6's with a shift light?
__________________
I wake up in the morning and I piss excellence.
-Ricky Bobby
America is all about speed. Hot, nasty, badass speed. -Eleanor Roosevelt, 1936
usa1camaro1969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2010, 10:04 PM   #558
CAMAR0
Loose is Fast!
 
CAMAR0's Avatar
 
Drives: Mikes Hard Lemons
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Brick House
Posts: 645
Quote:
Originally Posted by usa1camaro1969 View Post
I believe it is 7K.
Any v6's with a shift light?
Is not possible to vary?! My dyno runs drop off at 6800 and 7000 and i dont think he lifted?? If he lifted its 7k just trying to help..
CAMAR0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2010, 11:58 PM   #559
SIXJAK


 
SIXJAK's Avatar
 
Drives: MO's only SC'd LLT.
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Branson MO
Posts: 2,574
Does anybody think the STS setup would pull 13's on a 6AT? For reference, I ran a 14.7 in the summer which corrected to a 14.006 in a stock 6MT with the RS 20's and running 87 fuel. I have raced and beat all the other autos (SS included) in our small fleet.

Don't feel too bad. My bro with the SS auto cannot break into the 13's. He's messed with his Predator ad nauseum, has tried mixing 110 leaded with 104 unleaded and no dice.

Keep at it. We are all still very interested. Thank you for posting your results. I'm a little less frustrated with Hennessey and Lingenfelter now...lol.

There are no shift lights that I know of and yes that 1-2 crunch does not sound nice. But I ran my best time "crunching".
__________________
IPF supercharger kit, IPF tune, SW LT's, R. Tech HFC's, ARK DT-S catback, SS Brembo brake upgrade, BC Racing adjustable coilovers, Hurst STS, Pfadt rear arm package, Pfadt adjustable sways & end links, Pfadt diff bushings, BMR rear cradle full kit blk bezels,SS diffuser, Innovate gauges.
SIXJAK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11-08-2010, 06:36 AM   #560
usa1camaro1969
Back on the dino-juice
 
usa1camaro1969's Avatar
 
Drives: '10 LS + a few more
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by CAMAR0 View Post
Is not possible to vary?! My dyno runs drop off at 6800 and 7000 and i dont think he lifted?? If he lifted its 7k just trying to help..
Oh, I believe they can have some variance. I just know at around 7k mine feels like I've lost control of the pedal.
__________________
I wake up in the morning and I piss excellence.
-Ricky Bobby
America is all about speed. Hot, nasty, badass speed. -Eleanor Roosevelt, 1936
usa1camaro1969 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Updated - Twins almost here! - STS (Twin Turbo) Camaro SS 5th Gen SS Forced Induction - V8 249 08-19-2012 09:45 PM
Granatelli / Turbo Tech Twin Bottom Mount Turbo Systems Granatelli Forced Induction 20 11-30-2010 06:47 PM
Why TT over SC? Jefe's SS Forced Induction - V8 10 10-02-2010 03:14 AM
STS Remote Mount Turbo Kit for V6 ZNOLMT Forced Induction - V6 102 06-09-2010 12:18 PM
ULTIMATE PERFORMANCE* TURBO Camaro SS -- 750hp Custom Single Turbo Kit (T04Z) Ultimate Performance Forced Induction - V8 496 10-11-2009 01:29 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.