Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums -
sjm autoprod
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Forced Induction - V8

Thread Tools
Old 03-30-2009, 07:19 PM   #1
The BIRDman
Master ****sman
Drives: 1991 silverado
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: houston
Posts: 55
superchargers/turbochargers & mpg

exactly how much do superchargers/turbochargers affect mpg?
in relevance to a camaro ss that is.
The BIRDman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-30-2009, 07:57 PM   #2
Truth Enforcer
CamaroSpike23's Avatar
Drives: anything I can get my hands on
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: anywhere and everywhere
Posts: 22,825
Send a message via Yahoo to CamaroSpike23
depends on the charger and setup
Never race anything you can't afford to light on fire and push off a cliff
A group as a whole tends to be smarter than the smartest person in that group until one jackass convinces everyone otherwise.
Originally Posted by BowtieGuy View Post
Nobody makes CamaroSpike happy. You just disgust him a little less than other people.

Originally Posted by WheelmanSS View Post
Post count is truly an accurate measure of how cool someone is on the Internet.
Originally Posted by Greg Norris View Post
I piss excellence
and fart awesomeness
"You can think I'm wrong, but that's no reason to quit thinking.”
Originally Posted by Overflow View Post
But not all people were born awesome like you, Spike.
CamaroSpike23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2009, 04:05 AM   #3
Drives: 02 WS6 TA, 88 Fiero Formula
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Utard
Posts: 296
Typically, traditionally, a turbo setup better allows you to keep some of your mpgs as you can 'nurse' the engine to not make as much boost. That being said, there's still the facts of exhaust restriction and (hopefully) larger or higher flow injectors, so... The other factor to consider in both SC and TC is that the engine will make more power at a lower RPM, meaning that you won't need to down shift as much, which helps mileage a bit. wither way, if you're looking at mpgs, FI might not be your thing.
fierodeletre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-31-2009, 08:08 PM   #4
Drives: 1991 Camaro RS
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Dallas area
Posts: 596
In my '98 Camaro SS with twin turbos, I got around 15 to 18 mpg on a tank, depending on how much highway time and how much I got my foot into it. If I cruised on the highway with a tail-wind for the entire tank of gas I could hit 21 mpg. That was with upgraded (30 lb/hr) fuel injectors. The gearing on the 4th gens was not much different from the 2010 and the motor is similar, so I'd guess that would be a reasonable expectation for a turbo setup on a 2010, but there are a lot of variables.

And as stated above, if reduced fuel mileage would be a concern for you, you probably should not be looking at forced induction. I can guarantee you that the initial cost will not be the last money you spend on it. Some part will break, it will need retuning, something. Forced induction = $$
2010 Camaro SS in black/beige: Sold. | '91 Camaro RS: Still the dream car!
'98 Camaro SS: Incon twin turbo. Sold | '99 Camaro SS: Heads/cam/bolt-ons. Sold.
O2BQIK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2009, 01:02 PM   #5
DGthe3's Avatar
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 24,767
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
I've heard that forced induction tends to help a little bit (under low to moderate boost levels) but encourages more 'spirited' driving so real world economy almost always goes down
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2009, 01:05 PM   #6
radz28's Avatar
Drives: Ultra-Grin
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Crapramento, Crapifornia
Posts: 13,080
TheBIRDman - Please check your Private Messages.
05 Hummer H2 SUV on OEM Air Ride
Forged 11.4:1 408 LQ4 (K1 crank & rods; Mahle pistons)/CPP LS3 CNC heads/BTR Stage IV LS3 cam/home ported L92 intake manifold/ported 90mm TB/custom Volant CAI/Kooks 1 7/8" LTs and 3" H-pipe/AFE dual 3" CB/Corvette Servo/el cheapo lift/Cognito UCAs/Sphon poly adjustable TA/Sphon adjustable rear LCAs/e'fan conversion/DirtyMax radiator/Moroso catchcan/HPTuners/HID conversion/LED exterior lighting/LED interior accents/Autometer Cobalts/AEM WB/ Pioneer AVH-5600BHS/Pioneer GM-9601/2-Pioneer TS-W310D4s/Obcon Labyrinth dual-12 box/lots of other little stuff
radz28 is offline   Reply With Quote

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Official V6 MPG confirmed at 29 MPG hwy! fastball Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 83 03-23-2009 07:45 AM
Let me get this straight....LS3 vs. L99 MPG JMAN311 Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 28 03-18-2009 05:27 PM
Ready or not: 36 MPG by 2015 mandate from Feds Scotsman 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 76 03-07-2009 03:19 PM
Florida Senator Calls for 50 MPG Mandate In Exchange for bailout DMX General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 44 11-19-2008 09:31 PM
35 MPG Standard Will Kill the Muscle Car? Uh-Huh. Sure. Mr. Wyndham General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 6 01-09-2008 02:29 AM

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:29 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2018, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.