Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com

Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com (https://www.camaro5.com/forums/index.php)
-   Camaro 1LE Forum (https://www.camaro5.com/forums/forumdisplay.php?f=149)
-   -   How Should Chevrolet Build The 1LE? (https://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=197784)

LOWDOWN 01-26-2012 08:44 AM

How Should Chevrolet Build The 1LE?
 
At fbodfather's request, please vote in the poll...

As well, if not enough "choices" were given, add your version here...

BTW, it's MULTIPLE CHOICE!

rocketman 12 01-26-2012 08:46 AM

poll? :iono:


fail on me, it just wasn't up yet....Its too early to make comments, I guess. lol

rocketman 12 01-26-2012 09:04 AM

I like a combo of options 1&2. Question....what's MG9?:iono:

LOWDOWN 01-26-2012 09:10 AM

MG9 is the HD Tremec 6-speed, Standard on the ZL1. Stronger trans. means fewer "issues", down the road, for YOU and GM...

PYROLYSIS 01-26-2012 09:21 AM

The concept description just says close ratio transmission. I would like that to mean MG9. Basically I want Lowdown's sig but an LS3 instead of an LS7, mostly because I believe an LS7 would put the car too close to ZL1 territory and price.

LOWDOWN 01-26-2012 09:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by PYROLYSIS (Post 4377984)
The concept description just says close ratio transmission. I would like that to mean MG9. Basically I want Lowdown's sig but an LS3 instead of an LS7.

...which should have it priced very close to a Base BOSS...about $40-42K...

MichaelH 01-26-2012 09:55 AM

i think there needs to be a weight reduction choice to with if possible both 1&2. If not than option 1

bpoirier 01-26-2012 10:10 AM

An LS3 engine with more cam in it would fit the bill. The LS7 would add to much the cost I'm thinking.

ShnOmac 01-26-2012 10:13 AM

Combo of 1 & 2.....

Whatever engine they use it SHOULD be NA. JMO

fbodfather 01-26-2012 10:36 AM

mmmmmm............for the record - the question I have is:

Should we offer the concept as you see it

or

Should we not offer the concept as you see it.

Very important to understand that powertrains aren't 'plug and play' -

You can't just grab and engine or a transmission or an axle and put it into the powertrain - there are all kinds of algorithms -- from throttle control to ABS to traction control.....etc.etc.etc.

ShnOmac 01-26-2012 10:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fbodfather (Post 4378344)
mmmmmm............for the record - the question I have is:

Should we offer the concept as you see it

or

Should we not offer the concept as you see it.

Very important to understand that powertrains aren't 'plug and play' -

You can't just grab and engine or a transmission or an axle and put it into the powertrain - there are all kinds of algorithms -- from throttle control to ABS to traction control.....etc.etc.etc.

Sounds like we should scratch this thread and start over.... :laugh:

Russell James 01-26-2012 10:48 AM

If the choice is build it or don't build it.... I vote definately build it.

I really like a lot of the 1LE stuff... but also really like 2SS and RS content stuff. So maybe another version down the road based on a 2SS/RS and a little bump to the LS3 power, 1LE content, Z28 badges!

AlohaBR 01-26-2012 10:52 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fbodfather (Post 4378344)
mmmmmm............for the record - the question I have is:

Should we offer the concept as you see it

or

Should we not offer the concept as you see it.

Very important to understand that powertrains aren't 'plug and play' -

You can't just grab and engine or a transmission or an axle and put it into the powertrain - there are all kinds of algorithms -- from throttle control to ABS to traction control.....etc.etc.etc.

AS we see it!!!

Obzen 01-26-2012 10:53 AM

The only thing I wanted was the option to add different gears from the factory. Too late now obviously but would have been nice.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:40 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.