Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
TireRack
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > Camaro Price | Ordering | Tracking | Dealers Discussions


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-11-2009, 08:25 AM   #1
steveo17
 
steveo17's Avatar
 
Drives: 2006 VW GTI
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Sayreville, NJ
Posts: 40
Cash for Clunkers. Save money on your new Camaro!

MSNBC.com

Quote:
House approves ‘cash for clunkers’ plan
Consumers could receive $4,500 in rebates for turning in gas-guzzlers
The Associated Press
updated 5:50 p.m. ET, Tues., June 9, 2009

WASHINGTON -

The House on Tuesday approved a "cash for clunkers" bill that aims to boost new auto sales by allowing consumers to turn in their gas-guzzling cars and trucks for vouchers worth up to $4,500 toward more fuel-efficient vehicles.

President Barack Obama has encouraged Congress to approve consumer incentives for new car purchases as part of the government's work to restructure General Motors and Chrysler. The House approved the bill 298-119.

Supporters pushed for the measure to stimulate car sales and increase the fleet of fuel-efficient vehicles on the nation's highways. The auto industry has sought the incentives after months of poor auto sales.

"Stimulating sales is the only way to get the auto industry back on its feet," said Rep. Donald Manzullo, R-Ill.

General Motors Corp. and Chrysler LLC have received billions of dollars in government aid and the entire auto industry has watched car sales plummet during the past year. In May, overall sales were 34 percent lower than a year ago.

"Our industry has been stuck in neutral and really has not started to move," said Larry Kull, president of Marlton, N.J.-based Burns Kull Automotive Group, which includes General Motors, Honda and Toyota dealerships.

President Barack Obama has urged Congress to approve consumer incentives for new car purchases as part of the government's efforts to reorganize General Motors and Chrysler through the bankruptcy courts.

The vehicle scrappage bill has been under negotiations for months as lawmakers try to find a solution that boosts car sales while providing some environmental benefits. Proponents have pointed to similar programs in Europe that have enhanced auto sales.

Opponents said the bill failed to include incentives for used vehicles and represented an artificial incentive for the industry.

"It's defying the laws of economics and saying we can manufacture enough of a demand to keep the auto industry afloat," said Rep. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz.

Separately, House and Senate appropriators were discussing providing $1 billion to a supplemental war funding bill for the "cash for clunkers" program, which aims to generate about 1 million new auto sales. Since the yearlong vehicle program is expected to cost $4 billion, lawmakers would attempt to find the additional money later this year.

Under the House bill, car owners could get a voucher worth $3,500 if they traded in a vehicle getting 18 miles per gallon or less for one getting at least 22 miles per gallon. The value of the voucher would grow to $4,500 if the mileage of the new car is 10 mpg higher than the old vehicle. The miles per gallon figures are listed on the window sticker.

Owners of sport utility vehicles, pickup trucks or minivans that get 18 mpg or less could receive a voucher for $3,500 if their new truck or SUV is at least 2 mpg higher than their old vehicle. The voucher would increase to $4,500 if the mileage of the new truck or SUV is at least 5 mpg higher than the older vehicle. Consumers could also receive vouchers for leased vehicles.

Rep. Betty Sutton, D-Ohio, the bill's chief sponsor, said the bill showed that "the multiple goals of helping consumers purchase more fuel efficient vehicles, improving our environment and boosting auto sales can be achieved." Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., has backed a similar version in the Senate, which has the support of automakers and their unions.

The bill would direct dealers to ensure that the older vehicles are crushed or shredded to get the clunkers off the road. It was intended to help replace older vehicles — built in model year 1984 or later — and would not make financial sense for consumers owning an older car with a trade-in value greater than $3,500 or $4,500.

The U.S. industry is expected to generate about 9.5 million vehicles sales in 2009, compared to more than 13 million in 2008 and more than 16 million in 2007.

Auto analysts questioned whether it would be enough of an incentive for many consumers burdened by debt or financially stressed by the troubled economy.

"That is the major sticking point for Americans: How do you finance your vehicle? How do you pay for it?" said Rebecca Lindland, an auto industry analyst for the consulting firm IHS Global Insight.

A group of senators led by California Democrat Dianne Feinstein were pushing an alternative version that would require consumers to trade up for more fuel-efficient cars and trucks to qualify. They complained that even a 2009 Hummer H3T, which gets 14 mpg in city driving and 18 mpg on the highway, could qualify for the incentives under the House bill.

Under Feinstein's plan, a passenger car owner's trade-in would need to get 17 mpg or less to qualify and only new passenger cars getting at least 24 mpg would be eligible. Owners could receive a $2,500 voucher for a new car that gets at least 7 mpg more than their old car. The voucher would increase to $3,500 for new cars with a 10 mpg improvement and $4,500 for new cars with a 13 mpg increase in fuel efficiency.
for those trading in cars for a camaro, this could be an additional way of saving money perhaps
__________________
in due time....
steveo17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2009, 08:57 AM   #2
vm1971

 
Drives: 2017 SS
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Burlington Township, New Jersey
Posts: 833
and maybe finally (no offense to any owners of these) we'll see less and less "MONTE LUMINAS" on the road. hahahha!!!
__________________
2017 CAMARO SS
vm1971 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2009, 09:15 AM   #3
HemiWK57
 
Drives: 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee Hemi
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: RI
Posts: 16
OK so can someone answer this for me? I have a 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee with a 5.7 Hemi. Do I qualify for anything on a new V6 camaro?
HemiWK57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2009, 09:28 AM   #4
weedwacker13
 
Drives: 1990 isuzu trooper
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Stamford CT
Posts: 21
Ill give you $4,500 for a 5.7 jeep, just let me know.
weedwacker13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2009, 09:31 AM   #5
LDGn63
 
LDGn63's Avatar
 
Drives: WNABEE
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: DFW
Posts: 538
Quote:
Originally Posted by vm1971 View Post
and maybe finally (no offense to any owners of these) we'll see less and less "MONTE LUMINAS" on the road. hahahha!!!
Ha! my previous commuter was a Lumina sedan 27 MPG v6 and would burn the tires off from a standstill. (wasnt real pretty though)
__________________
Why oh Why?
Windshield=10" vertical
mirror= 3 7/8" (that's almost 4") vertical
that means that the mirror is 38.75% the size of the vertical windshield...
it sure seems like the ratio could be better... just sayin....

our collective MIRROR patch:
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=24612
LDGn63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2009, 09:34 AM   #6
LDGn63
 
LDGn63's Avatar
 
Drives: WNABEE
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: DFW
Posts: 538
Quote:
Originally Posted by weedwacker13 View Post
Ill give you $4,500 for a 5.7 jeep, just let me know.
surely this is ON TOP of trade value. (but watch out for low-ball trade values in conjunction)
__________________
Why oh Why?
Windshield=10" vertical
mirror= 3 7/8" (that's almost 4") vertical
that means that the mirror is 38.75% the size of the vertical windshield...
it sure seems like the ratio could be better... just sayin....

our collective MIRROR patch:
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=24612
LDGn63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2009, 09:37 AM   #7
PieNsky

 
PieNsky's Avatar
 
Drives: Victory Red 1LS
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Louisville,KY
Posts: 1,929
Looks as if I come close, but no cigar. My 2 wheel drive, 4 cylinder 4runner is listed as 18 city 22 hwy on the revised EPA MPG. I noticed you have to get a max of 18 mpg and I suppose that is combined but I can not find how they will do ti. On the gov site, it lists what a 15,000 mile a year use would cost and it was based on a combined driving (45% city?).
PieNsky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2009, 09:37 AM   #8
weedwacker13
 
Drives: 1990 isuzu trooper
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Stamford CT
Posts: 21
I dont believe that the bill is for above trade in value.

It is intended to get old cars off the road. Not 4 year old cars.

Anyway, my offer stands
weedwacker13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2009, 09:40 AM   #9
PieNsky

 
PieNsky's Avatar
 
Drives: Victory Red 1LS
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Louisville,KY
Posts: 1,929
Quote:
Originally Posted by LDGn63 View Post
surely this is ON TOP of trade value. (but watch out for low-ball trade values in conjunction)

I don't think so as the vehicles will be crushed to ensure that they will be taken off the road. Also, they would have to be in your name and insured for at least 12 months before the trade in.
Hmmmmm.... It will last for 12 months after it passes so you would have to go out NOW and buy a clunker and put the minimal insurance on it to get 4500 dollars
PieNsky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2009, 09:41 AM   #10
LDGn63
 
LDGn63's Avatar
 
Drives: WNABEE
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: DFW
Posts: 538
Quote:
Originally Posted by weedwacker13 View Post
I dont believe that the bill is for above trade in value.

It is intended to get old cars off the road. Not 4 year old cars.

Anyway, my offer stands
yea, apparently i fail reading comp 101!
"The bill would direct dealers to ensure that the older vehicles are crushed or shredded to get the clunkers off the road. It was intended to help replace older vehicles — built in model year 1984 or later — and would not make financial sense for consumers owning an older car with a trade-in value greater than $3,500 or $4,500."
__________________
Why oh Why?
Windshield=10" vertical
mirror= 3 7/8" (that's almost 4") vertical
that means that the mirror is 38.75% the size of the vertical windshield...
it sure seems like the ratio could be better... just sayin....

our collective MIRROR patch:
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=24612
LDGn63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2009, 10:06 AM   #11
HemiWK57
 
Drives: 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee Hemi
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: RI
Posts: 16
OK, so I guess I misunderstood and thought it would be an additional 3500-4500 incentive. Obviously my vehicle is worth more than 4500.
HemiWK57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2009, 10:12 AM   #12
Dukeboy01
 
Dukeboy01's Avatar
 
Drives: 2002 Camaro SS; 2001 Silverado
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 205
This program only works if you have a junker that's worth less than $4,500. You don't get the value of your trade- in and $4,500. If your car is worth more than $4,500 as a 2005 Jeep Grand Cherokee surely would be, then you would just trade your car in.

The way to make this work is to go find a $500 junker this weekend before the bill is signed, keep it for a year and then trade it right before the deal sunsets in 2010. If you already have an old junker, you're a step ahead in getting a handout from Uncle Sugar.
Dukeboy01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2009, 10:12 AM   #13
camaro67
Account Suspended
 
Drives: marina blue 67
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: branchland wv
Posts: 225
does my old 67 qualify big block about 10 miles per gallon
camaro67 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2009, 10:23 AM   #14
Design1stCode2nd
 
Drives: four wheels
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: usa
Posts: 585
The problem with this bill is at best you can get $4,500 so Unless you are rolling around in 15-20 yr old car this isn't all that great. Most 10yr old cars if they run OK will get you 2-4 grand anyway. Someone is always looking for a beater. And this is on a new car not a new used car so if you are running around in a 15 year old car most likely you can't afford a new one anyway.

So this will help a few people but not many.
Design1stCode2nd is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Think about this and the Z28 5th gen 13F20 Camaro ZL1 Forum - ZL1 Specific Topics 41 09-04-2010 12:59 AM
Can Camaro Single-handedly Save GM? Fandango 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 62 06-26-2009 02:36 PM
Ambient lighting (ABL) - the FINAL update = LIMITED TO DOOR PANELS CamaroScotty 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 338 04-15-2009 05:33 PM
Detroit News panel wants GM to build Camaro concept Tran 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 12 03-15-2009 04:38 PM
Answeres to questions I have stumbled on dieseldave24v 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 13 02-23-2009 06:56 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:22 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.