Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Vararam
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Tuning / Diagnostics -- engine and transmission


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-14-2018, 10:29 AM   #1
ChibiBlackSheep

 
ChibiBlackSheep's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 2SS/RS, 1968 SS
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Southeast, PA
Posts: 2,112
LFX Tuners — VE Table in HPT?

Hey everyone,

Is there a VE table for fueling on this LFX engine? Looking in HPT it seems like all of my adjustments to fueling just need to be MAF based, and the VE table is all 1 value.

Just wanted to make sure I don't have to do the MAF fail VE tune on this car, now that my MAF fueling is all in check.
__________________
LS3 Crate Engine Swap | CSP Custom Cam 232/240 .615/.615 113 +3 | Stainless Power LT Headers | Z28 Intake | Borla S-Type Exhaust | FTI Triple-Disc Billet 3200 Stall
2012 Camaro 2SS/RS | 1968 Camaro SS | 2020 Cadillac CT5 Premium Luxury | 2021 Spark LS

ChibiBlackSheep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2018, 11:33 AM   #2
MagnumForceGB


 
MagnumForceGB's Avatar
 
Drives: Fastest 2010 Camaro V6
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Newcastle, OK
Posts: 3,571
VE tables shouldn't have to be touched unless you have changed cams or added forced induction. The fueling table you are probably looking at is a modifier, will have to double check.
__________________
Camaro V6 = 11.268 @ 120.11
MagnumForceGB is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2018, 11:43 AM   #3
ChibiBlackSheep

 
ChibiBlackSheep's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 2SS/RS, 1968 SS
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Southeast, PA
Posts: 2,112
Quote:
Originally Posted by MagnumForceGB View Post
VE tables shouldn't have to be touched unless you have changed cams or added forced induction. The fueling table you are probably looking at is a modifier, will have to double check.
That's what I'm hoping is the case, because nothing I view makes sense for VE. Just wanted to make sure that I only needed to add a little fuel to the MAF because my lower end was leaning out.

I'm used to the lower end being VE and the upper end being MAF with a VE overflow.
__________________
LS3 Crate Engine Swap | CSP Custom Cam 232/240 .615/.615 113 +3 | Stainless Power LT Headers | Z28 Intake | Borla S-Type Exhaust | FTI Triple-Disc Billet 3200 Stall
2012 Camaro 2SS/RS | 1968 Camaro SS | 2020 Cadillac CT5 Premium Luxury | 2021 Spark LS

ChibiBlackSheep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2018, 12:54 PM   #4
MagnumForceGB


 
MagnumForceGB's Avatar
 
Drives: Fastest 2010 Camaro V6
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Newcastle, OK
Posts: 3,571
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChibiBlackSheep View Post
That's what I'm hoping is the case, because nothing I view makes sense for VE. Just wanted to make sure that I only needed to add a little fuel to the MAF because my lower end was leaning out.

I'm used to the lower end being VE and the upper end being MAF with a VE overflow.
It is the multiplier table, it multiplies the airmass by that number to get the final value of how much air there is, then it uses that to get the fuel mass that needs to be added to reach the desired AFR.

If you go to Edit->Virtual Volumetric Efficiency window, then where it says VE Mode, select Manifold Switch Open, it should list out how many milligrams of air is going into the intake based on RPM and MAP pressure.
__________________
Camaro V6 = 11.268 @ 120.11
MagnumForceGB is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.