Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Bigwormgraphix
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-08-2009, 11:46 AM   #29
POWERFREAK
I.AM.
 
POWERFREAK's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 2SS/RS/A6 cammed-n-whippled
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: NY
Posts: 2,638
Quote:
Originally Posted by chappy48 View Post
Is that 40-45 gain at 3500rpm with a tune? Because there's no way just an intake alone will give you that much power. I say, just send a production unit to Ted Jannetty and he can find out. He's one of the few people I trust to give a no BS answer.
dude...how many times did he write NO TUNE???
__________________
NY5thgen.com
POWERFREAK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2009, 11:54 AM   #30
toehead93


 
Drives: 2014 2SS/1LE
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: wpb fl
Posts: 3,136
since he was so tired last night I think he made have written it once and copy/paste it everywhere else.

I really would have loved VR to be part of the comparison. I guess well have to hope for another. I'm still getting a OTR regardless.
__________________
Used Racing Brake 2 Peice Rotors for sale:
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=344754

Summit White 2014 2SS 1LE
Recaros, NPP exhaust, Nav
2010 2SS A6 - sold.
toehead93 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2009, 12:14 PM   #31
MadMav
 
Drives: 2010 SS/RS M6
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Falcon, CO
Posts: 661
I truly want to believe the posted power numbers, but I'll wait for the hype to slow and the production models to get into the hands of the users.

Mav
__________________
SS/RS M6, SIM, CGM stripes, Barton S/T, BMR trailing arms, ADM Race intake(no scoop), Texas Speed 1 7/8" headers and full 3" exhaust, RMCR custom tune.
MadMav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2009, 12:20 PM   #32
2SSRS@Gen5diy
 
2SSRS@Gen5diy's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 Z/28 #82+#192, 18ZLE 66Nova
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: By the lake in AZ
Posts: 15,719
Tag nice info i am still hopping for the web site to update sone as i think a lot of the info some members want is on the new pages.
2SSRS@Gen5diy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2009, 12:56 PM   #33
TAG UR IT
www.Camaro5store.com
 
TAG UR IT's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 ZL1 #705
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: SA, Texas
Posts: 26,558
Quote:
Originally Posted by chappy48 View Post
Is that 40-45 gain at 3500rpm with a tune? Because there's no way just an intake alone will give you that much power. I say, just send a production unit to Ted Jannetty and he can find out. He's one of the few people I trust to give a no BS answer.
Once I get the excel data showing gains per rpm, etc, I will post that. Remember, that is already with my headers, high flow cats, etc. A stock car will show different numbers with higher gains. There is no tune on my car. Regarding your statement, "there's no way just an intake alone will give you that much power," I beg to differ. Why? Because just like Ted said, you have to factor in the fiddling with the MAF sensor location. It's almost like getting part of a tune in the unit itself. Also, Patrick is contemplating making the unit adjustable to better suit your car...meaning an adjustable MAF. But, the only issue is that it could cause issues for people who don't KNOW HOW to use the adjustment. People like Ted would be fine since he could hook up HP tuners or Diablo Sport, etc and actually read the AFR's on the car with the MAF one way or the other. But, you put it into Joe Blow's hands and say here you go. Put it this way for your application, but Joe Blow thinks he's going to get more power by turning it the other since that way is for "x" application, he could see tripped CEL lights, running much richer than he should, a rough idle (but GREAT on the acceleration).

Yes, the intake actually takes a small part of the tune since there is play with the MAF.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr_Draco View Post
You and Vararam can't make this claim until a comparison is done on the same car on the same dyno on the same day. No two dyno's are the same and every car puts out different gains on the same intake as another car with the same mods. From what I've seen, you have only tested the stock intake and Vararam but what's to say that New Era, Rotofab, CAI or a couple of the others won't put out the same or better numbers on your car? Until you done them all you can't say which one is the best.

I'm waiting on another CAI showdown before I make an decisions on who is better and what to buy as imo these types of comparisons are not complete nor fair as you didn't test the others.
To be fair, you are right. I'd need the New Era and all the others so I could test them side by side and see which one performs the best. Or, better yet, pick the best CAI done on the showdown, get them to send me one, and I'll put it up side by side along w/ the Vararam on my car...same dyno...same day...and I will provide video of it.

I'm sure Ted wants to get his hands on one too. Heck, we all would. Give it time and you will see. That's all I can say. I know it's hard to believe...for a lot of people. But, I have proof...and I posted video to prove what the intake can do on my car...on a dynojet...with proper corrections to be load bearing...land and sea. These are real #'s and real world gains (minus the fact that the vararam unit actually performs better when at actual speeds). You will also see on the site when it gets put up. I completely understand your skepticism and have nothing but respect for your apprehension. Just wait...you'll see (and I know we've been saying a lot of that lately). ;laugh:

Site is done. Corrections being made. Will be up shortly.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MadMav View Post
I truly want to believe the posted power numbers, but I'll wait for the hype to slow and the production models to get into the hands of the users.

Mav
Sounds good. Just hold off. You can see very well what is going on with my car in the provided videos at England Green. Just watch the reaction from the owner, Jason, on dyno #6 as he comes out of the office and looks at the screen. An expression, "kiss my ass!" heard in the background and my laughing in amazement should say it all.

Again, it's all good. You will understand more clearly when the site gets up and the units ship out. Money back guarantee....solidifies it.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2SSRS View Post
Tag nice info i am still hopping for the web site to update sone as i think a lot of the info some members want is on the new pages.
Hope they get it done soon too! I can only see people's eyes as they look at the screen and say, "woah!"
TAG UR IT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2009, 01:37 PM   #34
Cajundude@EnglandGreen
 
Drives: A few
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by TAG UR IT View Post
Sounds good. Just hold off. You can see very well what is going on with my car in the provided videos at England Green. Just watch the reaction from the owner, Jason, on dyno #6 as he comes out of the office and looks at the screen. An expression, "kiss my ass!" heard in the background and my laughing in amazement should say it all.
It is not just your car Doug. We have seen the same gains on several cars including the L99. We have not tested a V6. There will be naysayers whenever a new product comes out. This product has been underway for quite a while now and has been through rigorous testing and transformations to get the end result you see now.

Patrick will not let something go out the door that he is not 100% happy with. What I can tell you is that the pre-orders will be shipping soon and those that have been patiently waiting for it will be happy.

I'll dig up your run in a minute and get the raw data posted on the gains per rpm.

Jason
__________________

3135 Fall Street
Houston, Texas 77054 USA
281 464 2800
sales@englandgreen.com
AIM/iChat: englandgreen

EnglandGreen Corp. is a high performance facility that specializes in C6 & C5 Corvettes.


© 1994-2009 EnglandGreen
Cajundude@EnglandGreen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2009, 01:46 PM   #35
Scott@Bjorn3D


 
Scott@Bjorn3D's Avatar
 
Drives: Kami, 2013 2SS LS3 Luvin
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Eufaula, Alabama
Posts: 6,427
Send a message via MSN to Scott@Bjorn3D
So Jason is your shop where Patrick has done all the dyno testing? I have talked to him on the phone and the L99 model looks to kick some real butt. Can't wait to get mine.
Scott@Bjorn3D is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2009, 01:47 PM   #36
sales@vararam.com
 
sales@vararam.com's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 camaro
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Houston Tx
Posts: 562
Quote:
Originally Posted by JANNETTYRACING View Post
Nice Job Guys.

Do you have the Fuel Trim information?

Do you have the Timing and Knock Logs?

Why did you only make 2 baseline runs but 7 with the Varraram?

Just an Observation.

Some of that power is coming from fooling the MAF, The MAF is reporting less air than is actually flowing in to the engine due to MAF Clocking and how Air flows past the sensor hugging one side.

When the MAF reports Less Air then Actual 2 Things Happen, The A/F is leaned and the Timing is advanced.

So in essense the car is being tuned in that respect Via MAF Fooling.

What do we do to find power in a tune? We Clean up the A/F and advance timing.

LS3s with Headers and a Tune put down 410 RWHP with Stock air box and 420 with Most Aftermarket Air intake systems so your right in line with everyone else.

So How much of the power came form actual air flow and how much of the power came from MAF error?

I would say a 50-50 split

Were did the 6 HP and 4 lb torque go on the last pull, I think I know, Computer learning out Knock from too much timing due to maf error.

Ted.
I will give you some quick power point answers.

Anytime the MAF is moved, relocated ,resized or reshaped the entire curve will be changed and the entire system must be rescaled vs OEM to keep it within tolerance.
The Term "Tricking the meter" is not an accurate statement because any good design will follow OEM tolerance regardless of MAF location size or shape.
That is just one aspect of how a proper induction system is designed.
This is not an overnight process it takes time and thousands of miles of testing.
This is what we have spent our time doing with A6 and 6sp manual cars.


(There was no Knock of any kind and there has not been on any car in testing.)

As for power delivered more with headers less without etc... the setup you see is beyond conservative, you could run 89 Octane fuel through it and we have without any knock in 100 deg Texas weather.

because it is so conservative I know that we can easily pull another 5hp and 6-7 ftlbs out of it and even that will still be conservative.

(Filter Flow)The Filters height of 3.0inch is a none issue ,this is for another reason that you will see listed on our site later when it goes live.
( filters are 1400-2000CFM)


Heres the thing guys, This is one of the lowest Before and after Dyno numbers for a 6sp Man that we have on file!
(His Torque gain was low)
We wanted to start him off soft to verify where the car was ,then turn it up, turns out we had alot left.

Due to the Camaros weight ( 3,800lbs)The system is designed to produce greater Torque than HP gains.
There are many features that make that happen but one was to give up peak HP and concentrate on 4500-5500RPM rather than a 5500-5800RPM peak numbers.
Our goal was to build a broad fat power curve ,as an Engine development Engineer who specializes in induction system design, I pride myself on it.
This is a Tuned Induction system, not a cone with a pipe!
Peak numbers will never make for a quick car at 3,800lbs!

We could easily custom tune this car for another 10-15HP even after we lean on it from the numbers listed.

If peak numbers are all that is wanted ....thats easy ,We can switch the aero package around back to our original prototype combination and gain another 6-8hp but we will lose Our broad power curve and the car will not be any quicker.


WE will gain more from each kit ,once the car is on the move from the Ram Effect ,which we limited in the design of the system for a specific gain in flow resulting in a drop in D/A inside the plenum of the intake manifold.

Best Regards VR Tech
sales@vararam.com is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2009, 01:57 PM   #37
Cajundude@EnglandGreen
 
Drives: A few
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 17
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott@Bjorn3D View Post
So Jason is your shop where Patrick has done all the dyno testing? I have talked to him on the phone and the L99 model looks to kick some real butt. Can't wait to get mine.
I can not answer that 100%. There has been significant testing here and there have been some Beta units sent out to various parts of the country for testing.
Cajundude@EnglandGreen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2009, 02:07 PM   #38
Camar0wn3d
formerly "wh0rsep0wer"
 
Camar0wn3d's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 1SS Summit White
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Myrtle Beach, SC
Posts: 489
Quote:
Originally Posted by sales@vararam.com View Post
Our goal was to build a broad fat power curve ,as an Engine development Engineer who specializes in induction system design, I pride myself on it.

...

If peak numbers are all that is wanted ....thats easy ,We can switch the aero package around back to our original prototype combination and gain another 6-8hp but we will lose Our broad power curve and the car will not be any quicker.


WE will gain more from each kit ,once the car is on the move from the Ram Effect ,which we limited in the design of the system for a specific gain in flow resulting in a drop in D/A inside the plenum of the intake manifold.

Best Regards VR Tech
Torque FTW! Glad I waited!!!
__________________
2010 1SS/RS - CGM/Gray Interior - M6 (SOLD) Kooks 1 7/8" headers, Solo Mach-X, Vararam.

2012 2LS - Black A6 (SOLD)

2016 1SS Summit White A8
Camar0wn3d is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2009, 02:11 PM   #39
pedrero
 
pedrero's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS Black
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Fanwood, NJ
Posts: 31
Looks like we have a lot to look forward too. When do they finally ship? Is this the last stage of testing?
pedrero is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2009, 03:19 PM   #40
Wingnut
GOT IT....LOVE IT!!!
 
Wingnut's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS, Silver Ice
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 193
VR - Thanks for the detail and info behind the design. As an Engineer I appericate what you've done and how you've done it. Can't wait to get this baby running!
__________________
2SS, Silver Ice......delivered June 10th!
Wingnut is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2009, 03:29 PM   #41
mlee
CamaroFans.com
 
mlee's Avatar
 
Drives: ZLE & ZR2
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Conroe, TX
Posts: 37,501
I'm ready for some L99 numbers now...
__________________
mlee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-08-2009, 03:41 PM   #42
BackinBlackSS/RS
Go Blue!!!!!
 
BackinBlackSS/RS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Cruze LT
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 23,290
I thought there was going to be some runs on completly stock vehicles?
BackinBlackSS/RS is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Cold Air Intake Independent Testing Results by Jannetty Racing JANNETTYRACING Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 622 11-01-2019 05:28 PM
Great Read and Info on Oil Weight Banshee Mechanical Maintenance: Break-in / Oil & Fluids / Servicing 1 11-23-2009 09:03 PM
Pedders Suspension Benchmark Track Testing and New Jersey Track Day Info@PeddersUSA.com USA - NY / NJ / PA 35 10-26-2009 05:20 PM
Forza 3 update - full car list & new trailer Sean@Phastek Off-topic Discussions 7 10-09-2009 11:00 AM
LS3 goes 11`s Bonestock! GMRULZ Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 28 12-08-2008 09:10 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.