Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Vararam
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > Camaro ZL1 Forum - ZL1 Specific Topics


View Poll Results: If the "HP edition" Camaro was called Z28:
Yes, I would still be interested in purchasing the car. 537 78.17%
No, I wouldn't buy it because that's not what I think it should be called. 150 21.83%
Voters: 687. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-16-2011, 09:19 AM   #155
Spiv
Why you gotta be hatin'?
 
Spiv's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2LT/RS
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Simcoe, Ontario
Posts: 248
I think it shouldn't be called the Z28. As mentioned many times before, the Z was a beast, but a stripped down, all performance one that was affordable. From the sounds of this Camaro, it's not going to be affordable, it's going to be a loaded to the 9's beast.

For that reason, I say no. However, if it was made affordable, then I'd contemplate changing my vote.

Is it also possible they are working on a Z28 still? Or has this been confirmed not to be happening.
__________________
Hazman!!! Thx for the sig!
http://i136.photobucket.com/albums/q...Spiv-Sig01.jpg
We all have Camaro syndrome, I just suffer from the z28 strand.
Spiv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2011, 09:27 AM   #156
BackinBlackSS/RS
Go Blue!!!!!
 
BackinBlackSS/RS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Cruze LT
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 23,290
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spiv View Post
I think it shouldn't be called the Z28. As mentioned many times before, the Z was a beast, but a stripped down, all performance one that was affordable. From the sounds of this Camaro, it's not going to be affordable, it's going to be a loaded to the 9's beast.

For that reason, I say no. However, if it was made affordable, then I'd contemplate changing my vote.

Is it also possible they are working on a Z28 still? Or has this been confirmed not to be happening.
IF GM were to build a stripped down Z28, it would be in very low numbers and it would not be cheap. I don't see GM building anything stripped down to sell to the public.
BackinBlackSS/RS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2011, 09:42 AM   #157
Quick Sorrel
 
Quick Sorrel's Avatar
 
Drives: 1972 Chevelle LS5
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Chicago
Posts: 14
Z-28 for sure.
Quick Sorrel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2011, 10:03 AM   #158
SS-screamer
 
Drives: SIM RS/SS L99
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Sunshine State
Posts: 207
I don't care what it is called or will be called. If GM wants to name it something new and break from heritage then that will be fine. They will simply be adding another weapon to the arsenal. Call it a Mongoose, Panther or HiPer Edition or HP or whatever name they desire. All I know is that it will be badass and create it's own legacy.....and I will have one.
SS-screamer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2011, 10:18 AM   #159
BlackenedSS
 
BlackenedSS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS Black on Black Camaro
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Magnolia, TX
Posts: 173
Just don’t call it a Mustang!!!
BlackenedSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2011, 11:06 AM   #160
ghazzi1397
Hail to the GENERAL
 
ghazzi1397's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 CGM 2LT/RS
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: NJ
Posts: 423
def. Z28
__________________
Since the launch of the Camaro in 09, I've been dreaming of buying this car and finally today is the day. ORDER PLACED on 05/18/2010 for 2011 2LT CGM
(3300) Order scheduled for production, TPW 06/14/2010 [05/26/2010]
(3400) Order broadcast [06/15/2010]
(3800) Order produced [06/18/2010]
Available to ship from Osh [06/17/2010]
In-Transit from Osh [06/29/2010]
Available to ship from rail yard [07/08/2010]
Delivered [07/12/10]
ghazzi1397 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2011, 12:07 PM   #161
Mr Twisty


 
Mr Twisty's Avatar
 
Drives: the 2nd amendment home
Join Date: May 2008
Location: OK
Posts: 14,707
The 1st gen. Z/28 was neither stripped down, nor was it, (in 1969 dollars) affordable.
__________________
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
-- Benjamin Franklin
Mr Twisty is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2011, 12:13 PM   #162
Mr. Wyndham
I used to be Dragoneye...
 
Mr. Wyndham's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 ZL1 1LE
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 31,876
Send a message via AIM to Mr. Wyndham
At this point, the thread and poll is all based on the ASSUMPTION that they're not sure what to call it. And that assumption comes from here: http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=124078

The presenters never once mentioned the name "Z28" to attending dealers. It could be a marketing ploy....it could be an alias to preserve plausible deniability (What Z28? )...but just in case they weren't sure what to call it, I thought it would be interesting to hear what enthusiasts-at-large thought.



The more I think about it....and I've been thinking about it a lot, lately...it would be a HUGE mistake not to call this car a Z28. SLP has capitalized on the "ZLx" name, which rules out "ZL1" in my opinion...too much chance of confusion. And I don't think a car with this much interest can afford to be called something new. The heritage behind the Z28 name is monumental. I think the chances of yet another high-performance Camaro coming out for the 5th generation is slim-to-none...market interest and CAFE have seen to that....so if they don't use the Z28 name now....I'm afraid it'll never be used for a long time. Talk about a tragedy!!!

The argument against Z28 based solely on the first generation, I think is weak one. I mean, it's got some logic behind it...but what about every other generation of Camaro? I guess what I'm saying is that formulas change....who'd ever have thought the iconic Impala name would have been attached to a FWD car? But it has and one could argue successfully....

Still....this is all one big "What If"...and it's very interesting to see the pulse of the community on this subject.
__________________
"Keep the faith." - Fbodfather
Mr. Wyndham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2011, 12:29 PM   #163
Supercamaro64
Right, right.
 
Supercamaro64's Avatar
 
Drives: 79 Z28, 86 Camaro, 94 Burb 4x4
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Fond du Lac, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,350
Z/28, no question if you ask me. if this car is not named Z/28, then it will be a while before they use that name again, if ever. too many ppl are excited about the Z/28, not a nameless beast-maro. they want the beast to be a Z/28. i dont have the money to buy this car, and wouldnt have it for a looong time. but if i did, id buy it either way, and if it wasnt called the Z, id just order some Z/28 logos and put them on myself. id want the Z, so id get the Z either way
__________________
"You wanna lay the fate of the world on the kids camaro? Thats cool."
"When reporters asked what it was, one official stated, 'It's a small, vicious animal that eats Mustangs.'"
The Creampuff Fleet-
Supercamaro64 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2011, 12:31 PM   #164
wildpaws

 
wildpaws's Avatar
 
Drives: 1999 Blazer
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,228
Quote:
Originally Posted by SSmoked View Post
^^ the SSX. that may be possible the new name. SS-X.
you never know, as history recalls the first gen ss carried the big block 396 or 427 with big power, kinda simular to this. SS = ls3, SS-X = LSA/9(tvs1900/2300)
While there were regular production 396 BBs in the first gen. Camaro, there were no regular production 427 BBs, they were all COPO. And using the '69 model year, the SS350 sold 22,339 units while all of the 396 versions available sold a total of 13,970 units, almost two to one 350 vs 396. There was limited COPO production in the '68 model year with most of them going to Yenko. The '69 model year had four different 427 COPO packages available (not including the ZL1), when you add them together there were 1,084 427 COPOs built plus the ZL1 package which had 69 units built for a total of 1,953 427 COPOs. So what you propose might make some sense as compared to the first gen. history, now we need to wait and see what Chevrolet decides.
Clyde
wildpaws is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2011, 12:36 PM   #165
wildpaws

 
wildpaws's Avatar
 
Drives: 1999 Blazer
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,228
Quote:
Originally Posted by MisterCamaro69 View Post
The 1st gen. Z/28 was neither stripped down, nor was it, (in 1969 dollars) affordable.
It was at least as affordable as the SS Camaro in the first gen., usually more so since you did not have the added cost of auto tranny, vert, or AC. I could have bought either one as a twenty year old in 1969 (of course I was working a full time job and two part time ones), I chose the Z/28 based on it's performance.
Clyde
wildpaws is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2011, 01:10 PM   #166
nascarnate326
Team Green
 
nascarnate326's Avatar
 
Drives: 1998 Chevrolet Camaro Z28
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Olivet, MI
Posts: 288
Send a message via AIM to nascarnate326
I think they should call it Z/28. Not Z28. Not HP Edition. Not some new name.


Its like a no brainer to me.

Magnetic ride control...sounds like its made for the twisties.
__________________
'98 Camaro Z28 M6 -Toy
'07 HHR LT - DD
nascarnate326 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2011, 01:23 PM   #167
Oneday
 
Oneday's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2LT RS / Chrysler 300c
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Southern Illinois
Posts: 88
Z28 yes or no i dont mind
The Z28 is its heritage ....its history, and history is made every day!
Maybe its time for the next chapter in Camaro history.
Maybe the the baddest Camaro ever made needs a new name? a name that we will remember 25 years from now? like the Z28 from the past.

We all have been screaming about a new Z28 since the new 5th gen, I think if GM was going to name this one the Z28 they would have in the recent dealer meeting instead of an "HP edition".
All we can do is wait, time will tell!
Oneday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-16-2011, 01:56 PM   #168
DZ28

 
DZ28's Avatar
 
Drives: 2023 ZL1 M6 Riverside Blue
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Verrado, AZ
Posts: 852
556 horse!

My 1st inclination is "who cares what they call it with 550+ horse"! 67 Z/28 simply had hood and trunk stripes to differentiate. The RPO was Z28 and could be ordered with many other but not all options. The SS was top dog in the line up. I would simply make it a performance package option then drive another option with a track suspension (Z28). The track or Z28 option could be limited to the HP engine really making it special. Ordering a 67-69 Z meant disc brakes, better front swar bar, 4speed trans and different front/rear springs. The car laid low in stance and handled better than an SS Camaro.

Over time the Z28 became more and more appreciated. That 4x3 engine really screamed and made some decent HP above 5K RPM. RPO the LSA option then give us the chance to add a Z28 suspension with less understeer and better traction. I'm down for that!
__________________
** Sadly SOLD ** IBM 2SSRS Camaro M6... 2023 Riverside Blue ZL1 M6, 1 of 75
DZ28 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Gran Turismo 5... No Camaro? 5thGenOwner 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 111 12-06-2011 10:06 AM
* * * 2011 Camaro / SEMA Special Edition News * * * CamaroScotty Camaro Price | Ordering | Tracking | Dealers Discussions 16 11-06-2010 06:43 AM
Im sure this has been asked before.. But forgive my innocence :) gmag21 Suspension / Brakes / Chassis 23 02-21-2010 10:29 PM
Drag Racing Suspension Kits Info@PeddersUSA.com Suspension / Chassis / Brakes 25 02-21-2010 08:48 PM
Answeres to questions I have stumbled on dieseldave24v 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 13 02-23-2009 06:56 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:14 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.