02-04-2010, 11:28 AM | #1 |
Drives: 2010 Camaro, 2006 Z06 Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 3,370
|
Camaro Rear Toe Link failure, and the Pfadt solution
Hey everyone,
Just wanted to follow up on some information about the Camaro Rear Toe Link Brace we are offering. Below is a photo I took of a bent Rear Toe Link from a Camaro after the GS race at Daytona this past weekend. To compare, I have also posted a CAD image of what it should look like in stock form. At the GRAND AM Continental Tire Challenge race, several of the Camaros were involved in minor incidents. The common failure point and race ender for the cars was this. The Pfadt stiffening brace is designed to strengthen this weak factory piece tremendously. Just take a look at our previous thread to see how much! More info on the Pfadt solution to this weak point is in this thread here : http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=60640 http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=54813 And as always, just give us a call if you need more info, or have any questions. Last edited by PfadtRacing; 03-10-2010 at 12:57 PM. |
02-09-2010, 09:03 AM | #2 |
Also for those who are worried about the small amount of fabrication, we are helping many customers out an sending exchange cores, already welded to help save some time!
This is an awesome valued product, and suspension/chassis upgrade. Regards |
|
02-09-2010, 02:25 PM | #3 |
Search Ninja
Drives: 2010 Black 2SS/RS A6 Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Central Ark
Posts: 7,183
|
What is the weight difference between these and the full replacement part?
__________________
2010 Black 2SS/RS A6
Halltech CF 102 fed GPI modded intake manifold Bo (knows) White ported TB Kooks LT's/ Dynomax VT Pfadted (springs/sways) Dyno tuned by Rhino and GPI I once parallel parked a train. |
02-19-2010, 06:07 PM | #4 |
Drives: 2010 Camaro, 2006 Z06 Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 3,370
|
Hi axis,
We have not weighed any competitors arms so we can not compare. We currently are finalizing the Pfadt carbon rear control arm designs, so we are not sure how it will compare in weight against that piece either. If we get any more info, we will be sure to post it up! |
04-24-2010, 07:53 AM | #5 | |
Quote:
Also for Pfadt- any update on these? ---> Pfadt carbon rear control arm designs Thanks |
||
04-24-2010, 10:14 AM | #6 |
Petro-sexual
|
Just so I can understand better...
Are these only really a problem if there is contact or collision in this area? If nothing happens unless there's a collision, I'm not as worried, but otherwise... Also - so you are offering an upgrade kit to modify the OEM arm, yes? Why not just fabricate a replacement? I'm just wondering |
04-26-2010, 10:49 AM | #7 | |
Drives: 2010 Camaro, 2006 Z06 Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 3,370
|
Quote:
Due to the response on our existing arm solutions (stiffeners, bushings, adjustable toe arms, steel rear trailing arms etc.) we have made the Carbon Control Arms a lower priority than other projects at the moment. We have had a tremendous amount of response from those pieces, and don't feel that the Carbon Arms are mandatory for the moment, compared to what we already offer. |
|
04-26-2010, 11:36 AM | #8 | |
Drives: 2010 Camaro, 2006 Z06 Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 3,370
|
Quote:
As we have shown with our FEA of the OEM arm, the effects of these conditions can be severely decreased by using the control arm stiffener, in conjunction with our bushing kit for the toe arms. It is an excellent solution that offers the best bang-for-the buck value. We attacked this area with multiple solutions, for various budgets. Because the OEM arm lent itself to being boxed in so easily, this was the first thing we considered. It wound up as an ultra low cost solution for customers. We also have a bolt in arm, that is stronger, and MUCH lighter than OEM, that is adjustable, and is an even better solution. We have had a lot of great feedback from these arms. Check the pic below! Let me know if you need any more info! |
|
|
|
|
|