Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Bigwormgraphix
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-21-2008, 10:02 PM   #1
pruettfan
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS / 2011 Z28
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 333
L99 Theory, Gas Guzzler Tax

After reading the newly released info I think that the reason GM went with the L99 which is a detuned LS3 is for the gas mileage and so that the automatic would not be subject to the gas guzzler tax. If so I aplaud GM. Having paid the gas guzzler tax in the past it really sucks to pay an extra 2k to the IRS.
pruettfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 10:09 PM   #2
The_Blur
Moderator
 
The_Blur's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 Harley-Davidson Street Bob
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 14,769
Send a message via AIM to The_Blur
According to the fine print, both V8s get 23 mpg on the highway. I think that GM had too much trouble equipping the LS3 with AFM and VVT.
__________________
RDP Motorsport//GEN5DIY//Cultrag Performance//JPSS//Rodgets Chevrolet//
Operation Demon//Buy at Invoice//RACECARWEAR
RESPECT ALL CARS. LOVE YOUR OWN.
warn 145:159 ban
The_Blur is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 10:10 PM   #3
marticus24
 
Drives: 2012 ZL1
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Metro Detroit, MI
Posts: 604
So if the M6 LS3 gets 23MPG, will it have to pay the gas guzzler tax? Sorry, haven't read up on it.
marticus24 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 10:16 PM   #4
pruettfan
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS / 2011 Z28
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Chandler, AZ
Posts: 333
23 mpg won't pay GG tax but I believe the LS3 with an auto without the AFM and VVT would get less therefore would be subject to the GG tax. I know that my GTO was an auto and I had to pay almost 2k in GG tax. Since they are competing with the Mustang it is clear than the extra 2k would hurt sales.
pruettfan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2008, 10:48 PM   #5
Mr. Wyndham
I used to be Dragoneye...
 
Mr. Wyndham's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 ZL1 1LE
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 31,876
Send a message via AIM to Mr. Wyndham
Quote:
Originally Posted by pruettfan View Post
but I believe the LS3 with an auto without the AFM and VVT would get less therefore would be subject to the GG tax.
Good thing that combination doesn't exist then, huh?
__________________
"Keep the faith." - Fbodfather
Mr. Wyndham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2008, 08:11 AM   #6
BergerSSno81
 
Drives: 2002 Berger SS Phase 2
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Ct
Posts: 5
strange that the corvette gets 25 hwy with the ls3 auto tho...is the camaro that heavy?
BergerSSno81 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2008, 12:03 PM   #7
Mr. Wyndham
I used to be Dragoneye...
 
Mr. Wyndham's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 ZL1 1LE
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 31,876
Send a message via AIM to Mr. Wyndham
highway fuel economy has little to do with weight. It owes itself almost entirely to aerodynamics. And the Corvette is an VERY slippery car. Whereas the Camaro actually has a face.

Oh, and the fuel economy estimates are just that: GM estimates.
__________________
"Keep the faith." - Fbodfather
Mr. Wyndham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2008, 12:05 PM   #8
Txturbo
Keeper of the Faith
 
Txturbo's Avatar
 
Drives: 2001 Z28 Agressively
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Rosenberg,Texas
Posts: 1,383
In one of the chats this morning someone asked why his 4th gen gets 30mpg on the highway and the 5th gen will only get 23. The reply was, if you get 30 now, you will get better with a 5th gen.
__________________

2010 Camaro SS R6P
2001 Camaro Z28
1969 Camaro SS clone

Txturbo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2008, 12:06 PM   #9
Chogan2200
 
Chogan2200's Avatar
 
Drives: 96 Cavalier "Scarlet"
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Roanoke/Newport News VA
Posts: 102
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragoneye View Post
highway fuel economy has little to do with weight. It owes itself almost entirely to aerodynamics. And the Corvette is an VERY slippery car. Whereas the Camaro actually has a face.

Oh, and the fuel economy estimates are just that: GM estimates.
don't forget paint color! I can't remember if its Black cars or White cars but one of them gets the worst gas mileage. I want to say it's black because black absorbs so much heat but then again, doesn't heat rise?
Chogan2200 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2008, 12:13 PM   #10
Warghost
 
Drives: Camaros & Mustangs
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Port St Lucie, FL.
Posts: 168
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chogan2200 View Post
don't forget paint color! I can't remember if its Black cars or White cars but one of them gets the worst gas mileage. I want to say it's black because black absorbs so much heat but then again, doesn't heat rise?
Black actually allows better gas mileage, but it's not even noticeable. Black gets hotter, which repels air and creates somewhat of an air cushion around the car, creating less drag.
Warghost is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2008, 12:21 PM   #11
LSxcellent
 
Drives: MINI Cooper S
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 284
Quote:
Originally Posted by pruettfan View Post
After reading the newly released info I think that the reason GM went with the L99 which is a detuned LS3 is for the gas mileage and so that the automatic would not be subject to the gas guzzler tax. If so I aplaud GM. Having paid the gas guzzler tax in the past it really sucks to pay an extra 2k to the IRS.
I'd disagree...

The L99 IS essentially an LS3, it just has the AFM.

They use the LS3 with the manual because AFM doesn't work with a manual tranny... it needs to communicate with the transmission to work properly (to sense load and gear).

I'm sure GM *WOULD* use AFM on the LS3 if they could, but right now it doesn't work.

Also, the L99 is limited to a lower RPM (again because of the AFM system), and therefore it makes less power.

~LSx
__________________
"When you turn your car on, does it return the favor?"
LSxcellent is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2008, 01:01 PM   #12
theholycow


 
theholycow's Avatar
 
Drives: '02 GMC Sierra, '80 Lesabre
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: RI
Posts: 1,804
Quote:
Originally Posted by Txturbo View Post
In one of the chats this morning someone asked why his 4th gen gets 30mpg on the highway and the 5th gen will only get 23. The reply was, if you get 30 now, you will get better with a 5th gen.
EPA ratings (new style, same test procedure as they'll use on the 2010 model) from fueleconomy.gov:
2002 V6 17/28AT 17/29MT
2002 V8 16/23AT 17/26MT

From the PDF: AT highway numbers only -- V6 26, V8 23

If the EPA rating is less, there's no reason to expect you'll get more. The EPA might not predict accurately what YOU will get, but it does predict accurately the difference between one car and the next for you.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chogan2200 View Post
don't forget paint color! I can't remember if its Black cars or White cars but one of them gets the worst gas mileage. I want to say it's black because black absorbs so much heat but then again, doesn't heat rise?
No. Cold air sinks, displacing the warmer air upwards, if there's no other movement; but it doesn't apply to anything we're talking about.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Warghost View Post
Black actually allows better gas mileage, but it's not even noticeable. Black gets hotter, which repels air and creates somewhat of an air cushion around the car, creating less drag.
Could also be due to intake air temperature. Warmer intake air doesn't produce as much power but it does produce better fuel economy. Depending on where the airbox draws from it might get warm air -- my GMC pickup draws air from the fender area and I suspect that a black truck would get better mileage on sunny days.
__________________
Removing weight has surprisingly little effect on fuel economy
Engine break-in procedure | Gear ratios
2002 GMC Sierra 4x4 5.3 (190,000 miles and going strong)
1980 Buick Lesabre family heirloom with 36,000 miles
2008 Volkswagen Rabbit 2 door I5-2.5 5spd DD lease
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamaroSpike23 View Post
she really underestimates the damage i would do to her reproductive organs
http://allOffTopic.com is the place for all the naughty stuff you can't get away with on this forum...
theholycow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-22-2008, 01:06 PM   #13
RCowan
 
RCowan's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 2SS/RS
Join Date: May 2008
Location: H-town
Posts: 156
The only difference besides the AFM might be a slightly different cam and of course, tune. Those are both easily corrected.

Anyway, if you do nothing to it except put in an aggressive stall you should be able to make a solid 12sec car out of the pig.
RCowan is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
At $4/gallon us Yanks have it good Scotsman General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 39 06-03-2008 03:43 PM
gas prices. Congoman775 General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 65 05-28-2008 12:20 PM
Gas Guzzler Tax Roflmao Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 11 02-29-2008 05:29 PM
gas guzzler tax Mike88 Canada 15 01-08-2008 12:54 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.