08-18-2007, 12:49 PM | #29 |
original senior member
Drives: 1993 s10 tahoe 4.3L v6 tbi Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Mableton Georgia
Posts: 357
|
omg, that is awsome! I should join a challenger forum and make thaat my sig
__________________
|
08-18-2007, 09:29 PM | #30 | |
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS Join Date: May 2006
Location: Southern NJ
Posts: 2,260
|
Quote:
GFX make most cars look better (and some NEED them to look nice imo). I definitely want to see a GFX/Spoiler package for the 5th Gens (RS?). I just hope they don't wait 4 years (I think it was 4) to make it an option like they did on the 4th Gens. It needs to be an option from day 1. I want something a little more subtle than the pic above though. LOL The exact concept with just added GFX, no need to change the whole front fascia imo. |
|
08-18-2007, 09:52 PM | #31 |
I used to be Dragoneye...
|
I'm not feeling that. Maybe some minor alterations to the front and sides, but not that much. That looks like the Camaro ate one too many Mustangs.
|
08-19-2007, 12:49 AM | #32 |
Member
Drives: '96 Chevy Lumina '86 Camaro Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Maryland
Posts: 3
|
|
08-19-2007, 12:52 AM | #33 |
I used to be Dragoneye...
|
I can't see a V6 for $7,000, like the LS3...but you have a point. There's a 350 crate engine (carbeurated) running for something like $2,000 - Obviously, it's old...but you do have a point.
|
08-29-2007, 06:49 AM | #34 |
Drives: No Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Hershey
Posts: 1
|
Too Funny
Although the new Camaro is on my wish list, I have to laugh at the Kudos being dished out on the board for the GM styling team. Especially with vehicles like the GTO and it's "fresh" styling falling way short of GTO enthusiests expectations. Mopar guys bitched about the Charger's "fresh" styling to which they responded with the Challenger. Personally, I hate mustangs and the people who drive them as they are mostly hyper-punk 5.0 weenies (or 4.6 now)...
GM had better put some muscle under the hood to compete with the 6.1 Hemi slated to go into the Challenger. If not, there is going to be some majorly disappointed trans-camaro owners. BTW: I wonder what the retro Firebird will look like? 68? 69? You know it's coming. |
08-29-2007, 07:37 AM | #35 |
E.B.A.H.
Drives: you wild... Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: In the happy padded room wearing a jacket that makes me hug myself...
Posts: 18,421
|
Welcome to the boards. There was a thread posting the T/A's that people chopped. It's basically the camaro body with slightly different styling of the front airdam. Just like the 4th gen/f-bodies were.
|
08-29-2007, 08:51 AM | #36 | |||
Go Rays!
Drives: 03 Trailblazer Join Date: May 2007
Location: St Pete, Florida
Posts: 2,533
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Welcome to the board. |
|||
08-29-2007, 03:00 PM | #37 | |
I used to be Dragoneye...
|
Quote:
Oh, and Welcome! |
|
08-29-2007, 03:13 PM | #38 |
Go Rays!
Drives: 03 Trailblazer Join Date: May 2007
Location: St Pete, Florida
Posts: 2,533
|
|
08-29-2007, 03:15 PM | #39 |
I used to be Dragoneye...
|
Nothing really - he's outta the loop, you know.,
Lutz is my hero. |
08-29-2007, 07:18 PM | #40 | |
Moderator.ca
|
Quote:
I forget where I pulled that from now . . . will update if I find it |
|
08-29-2007, 09:10 PM | #41 | |
I used to be Dragoneye...
|
And Scott has said that "class leading acceleration and overall performance" is an essential ingredient to Camaro. That settles it for me, BUT if you need more persuation , try this on for size:
Quote:
|
|
12-05-2007, 07:50 PM | #42 |
Drives: 1988Nissan Pulsar (meh,beater) Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 83
|
<3 fbodfather.
|
|
|
|
|