Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
TireRack
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > Chevy Camaro vs...


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-04-2013, 04:43 AM   #1
Cyber Gray
Wind Rider
 
Cyber Gray's Avatar
 
Drives: Black 2SS/RS 14; Jeep 5.7 GC 15
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Muscat
Posts: 2,047
L99 2013 VS GT Mustang Auto 2013

Thinking about leaving the V6 league and moving to the V8. I have 2 cars in mind right now the Mustang GT and the SS both auto and 2013.

Which one will have more low end torque, better ride quality, and most improtant thing to me (zero) dead spots in gear shifting
__________________
Im not Gray any more !!
Cyber Gray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2013, 07:07 AM   #2
SRT8Tech
2013 Super Bee
 
SRT8Tech's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Super Bee
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Jacksonville FL.
Posts: 711
Youre gonna have to drive both to really get a true feeling for it.
__________________
2007 Procharged SRT8 Charger..........SOLD
2010 Mopar 10 Challenger.................SOLD
2010 R/T Classic Challenger...............SOLD
2011 392 Challenger.........................SOLD
2012 mid 10 second 1/4 mile GT500.... SOLD


Current ride 100% stock 2013 Plum SuperBee............best of 12.407 @ 114.28 for now.

Tune, CAI and Drag radials. Best of 12.00 @ 115.74
SRT8Tech is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2013, 07:49 AM   #3
usafboy

 
usafboy's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Silver SS/RS LS3
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 884
^^^ what thy said bcus everyone on here will go back and forth. Just from reading on here, mustang is faster due to lighter weight, camaro better handling, looks, and interior. I'd go camaro with 1LE package but it only comes in manual.
__________________
2010 Silver Ice Metallic Camaro SS/RS LS3
Mods...so far: resonator/muffler delete, tinted everything, '13 shift knob/boot, bowtie delete, PFADT sway bars, CAI intake, Hurst short shifter, JBA cat deletes, BMR trailing arms/outer bushings/steering rack bushing, Bo White ported TB.
Rhino79 Dyno tuned...405 HP/399 TQ

Last edited by usafboy; 01-04-2013 at 08:13 AM.
usafboy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2013, 08:28 AM   #4
Dave Coyle


 
Dave Coyle's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 SS , 1970 Z-28, 2002 Avalanche
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Michigan
Posts: 2,525
They are both great cars but the edge goes to the Camaro for better ride quality, better handling and better braking. The Mustang is quicker but that is about it.
__________________
IF IT'S WORTH HAVING, IT'S WORTH WAITING FOR!!!! (AND IT WAS)
434RWHP/403RWTQ
Livernois Motorsports 2C Cam kit
Kooks 1 7/8 LT Headers/Hi-Flo Cats/Corsa Exhaust
Roto-Fab CAI / Port Intake
Precission 2400/2800 Converter/3.73 AAM gears
Livernois Motorsports Tune

Best time: 11.97 @ 117 MPH
Dave Coyle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2013, 09:09 AM   #5
Stew


 
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by usafboy View Post
^^^ what thy said bcus everyone on here will go back and forth. Just from reading on here, mustang is faster due to lighter weight, camaro better handling, looks, and interior. I'd go camaro with 1LE package but it only comes in manual.
looks and interior are totally opinion, IMHO the Mustang looks as badass as the Camaro, expecially the 13. Interior can and does go both ways. Handling depends on he model, the GT with Brembo has most consistently bested the SS in comparisons and track times, the Mustang by sheer virtue of weight and gearing is usually quicker and easily has the advantage auto to auto. The Camaro has a better ride and feels more substantial, the 4 wheel Brembos are definatly superior to the mustangs front only. Just drive them, only way to really know.
Stew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2013, 09:41 AM   #6
camaro-dreamer
 
camaro-dreamer's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Porsche 981S
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: TN
Posts: 310
The most important part for you (zero dead spots) can be had on either car. The price, of course, is a tune. The other thing to keep in mind is the AFM on the camaro. I see that you installed an aftermarket exhaust on your LT. If you plan to do the same on an L99 SS, you may want to check into some of the AFM drone threads.
camaro-dreamer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2013, 10:05 AM   #7
sasquash1984
502 RWHP N/A
 
sasquash1984's Avatar
 
Drives: The yeti
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Saginaw/ Ft Worth TX
Posts: 3,088
Auto mustang gonna run 8.6 in 1/8 mile and auto ss stock will run 9.0-9.1 in 1/8 mile this I know
__________________
factory motor factory trans, Gpi ss4 cam stock heads ported and milled, full exhaust, circle d 5c 4000 triple disk, 3:91 rear end with posi mod, cai, bmr derlin rear diff bushins, bmr derlin cradle bushins, bmr trailing arms, toe rods with bushings, and bmr anti extreme sway bar. Weld rt-s 17x5 fronts and 17X10 rears on mickey thompson et street r's
sasquash1984 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2013, 10:38 AM   #8
Cyber Gray
Wind Rider
 
Cyber Gray's Avatar
 
Drives: Black 2SS/RS 14; Jeep 5.7 GC 15
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Muscat
Posts: 2,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by SRT8Tech View Post
Youre gonna have to drive both to really get a true feeling for it.
Well I had a spin on my mate 2010 L99, didnt really feel much difference than my LT maybe because mine has every single bolt on in the market so far.

I wonder if the 2013 model is any different and worth trying
__________________
Im not Gray any more !!
Cyber Gray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2013, 10:40 AM   #9
Cyber Gray
Wind Rider
 
Cyber Gray's Avatar
 
Drives: Black 2SS/RS 14; Jeep 5.7 GC 15
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Muscat
Posts: 2,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by camaro-dreamer View Post
The most important part for you (zero dead spots) can be had on either car. The price, of course, is a tune. The other thing to keep in mind is the AFM on the camaro. I see that you installed an aftermarket exhaust on your LT. If you plan to do the same on an L99 SS, you may want to check into some of the AFM drone threads.
Thats a very important point. But as I can see so far that tune on the GT is making wonders, while the L99 is still not reaching the 400RWHP with tune and bolt ons :(.
__________________
Im not Gray any more !!
Cyber Gray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2013, 11:23 AM   #10
sasquash1984
502 RWHP N/A
 
sasquash1984's Avatar
 
Drives: The yeti
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Saginaw/ Ft Worth TX
Posts: 3,088
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyber Gray View Post
Thats a very important point. But as I can see so far that tune on the GT is making wonders, while the L99 is still not reaching the 400RWHP with tune and bolt ons :(.
Tune, Cai, long tubes, and gears and exhaust on l99 got me 356 to wheel, ls3 conversion got me 440 to wheel
__________________
factory motor factory trans, Gpi ss4 cam stock heads ported and milled, full exhaust, circle d 5c 4000 triple disk, 3:91 rear end with posi mod, cai, bmr derlin rear diff bushins, bmr derlin cradle bushins, bmr trailing arms, toe rods with bushings, and bmr anti extreme sway bar. Weld rt-s 17x5 fronts and 17X10 rears on mickey thompson et street r's
sasquash1984 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2013, 11:37 AM   #11
MichaelH
SOCAL HT5
 
MichaelH's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 BRM ZL1 M6
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 1,495
Quote:
Originally Posted by sasquash1984 View Post
Auto mustang gonna run 8.6 in 1/8 mile and auto ss stock will run 9.0-9.1 in 1/8 mile this I know
theres no way SS runs 9 in the 1/8 my v6 runs 9.0-9.1 in the 1/8 mile
__________________
2013 ZL1 M6 - Mods-in the works

Old vehicles
2010 CGM Camaro (sold)
Other Vehicles:
2008 Kawasaki ZX6R-115 RWHP in mid summer
2006 Chevy Trailblazer SS- For Sale; Lots of extras
MichaelH is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2013, 01:24 PM   #12
IMJ
 
IMJ's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 SS LS3 | Silver Frost Metallic
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Illinois
Posts: 336
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave Coyle View Post
The Mustang is quicker but that is about it.
Which unfortunately is where it counts almost every time in a muscle car.
I hate saying this, but Chevy needs to stop being creamed by Ford in the power section of the Pony ride.
__________________
__________________________________________
Ironman John
IMJ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2013, 01:49 PM   #13
trw427ss @ Futral

 
trw427ss @ Futral's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 2SS/RS L99
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Denham Springs La.
Posts: 790
Quote:
Originally Posted by sasquash1984 View Post
Auto mustang gonna run 8.6 in 1/8 mile and auto ss stock will run 9.0-9.1 in 1/8 mile this I know

I know my 13 L99 is a freak but it ran 8.2s in the 1/8 Bone stock. there is no way they run 9.0s in the 1/8!
__________________
2013 2SS/RS L99/A6 Crystal Red Metallic Tincoat 12.76@108.98mph Bone Stock
12.46@111.19mph with New Era CAI & U/D Pulley
12.12 @ 114.16 after Stainless Power headers and no tune yet on stock P-Zero's!
12.007@ 115.20 With 18" Drag Radials - 11.93 @115.19 Added a PTB 11.76 @116.59 With Yank SS3200 Converter - 11.63 @116.52 After PI and Tuning 11.44 @118.75 New Best
10.72 @127.93 after heads and Cam and Yank SS3600
trw427ss @ Futral is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2013, 01:56 PM   #14
Xavier1421
 
Xavier1421's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 2SS/RS
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: FL
Posts: 79
Mine ran 8.6 on a cool FL night :-\ All other runs were knockin on 8.9+

So I either have a factory retard (considering it's not stock), or 9's and L99 is not just a coincidence.
Xavier1421 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:10 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.