View Single Post
Old 04-04-2010, 01:48 AM   #12
Z_Rocks

 
Z_Rocks's Avatar
 
Drives: everyone crazy...
Join Date: May 2009
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 2,109
Quote:
Originally Posted by SonnyakaPig View Post
I get it. But it seems like if you want to use a centri and still get some great low end torque you can put on some headers, and tune the computer accordingly and cars that do that have near 600 rwhp and they seem to have almost 400 ft lbs of tq at around 2500 rpms.

Those are kind of general numbers but from what I recall after looking over some dyno graphs of centris with that setup that I described, I'm pretty sure those numbers are attainable.

In that case you can have the linear hp curve that just keeps rising and also a big number tq output from relatively low rpms. Still, I know it's not like the Maggie or K/B that shows a fat, straight-line tq curve from 2000 rpms onward.
I'm happy to see you doing your homework :-)
Here is some info from someone who has had a few F/I
Centris are great for linear acceleration and provides time to hook up. This is important for Drag Racing;
Positive Displacement provide lots of low end TQ which is awesome while in a role in low RPM and for daily drive. If you're not drag racing go with P/D
The third F/I is TT ( and I mean Twin Turbo and not single), because it give you best of both worlds.
Take a look at this post from RPM and study the TQ v.s. RPM and it's a great daily driver and and a racer. http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=74302
Z_Rocks is offline   Reply With Quote