View Single Post
Old 05-28-2010, 11:42 AM   #72
Stew


 
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by CamaroBelarus View Post
What the hell are just repeating my post words LOL! If u want, get it again:
1. Its not ME coming mustangsource.com and "trying to make yourself feel better about your purchase".
2. Pricing IS NOT similar, its 1-1.5k difference.
3. The Camaro IS better handler cos of IRS for sure, and IT IS quicker, if it modded to same price, as stock stang is cost.
4. Its U, who came here and trying to justify your purchase.
5. Ive bough my dream, was it wrong? Idiotizm thinking like that.

And the last one: Every ur post repeating urs or parts of other people. SO. U try to use some new thoughts and ideas, or il just copy and past for u all previous 5 FACTS for u, so i wont waste a lot of time on a troll, who cant even listen. (even not me, people had a ride on it , did u? JESUS)
It's been shown time and time again pricing IS similar, in the example earlier the Mustang was actually 400 LESS with the Premium optioned same as the 2LT (please don't bring up wheel size because honestly 17s are fine for anycar and the Mustang is smaller than the Camaro anyways so 20s would look a bit oversized) . The Mustang handles better period, it is the difference between a well done SRA and a ok done IRS, the numbers proce it period...... TThe Mustang is quicker period, you can't compare modified cars to stock cars, oh and I have not purchased either of the 3 yet, though I have driven examples of all 3 including a 1lt Camaro. I like all 3, I am just being patient and taking my time to digest all 3, though I will probably end up with a CHallenger R/T. In any case we have went down this road before and you were shown to be wrong then, so I am done.
Stew is offline   Reply With Quote