[Mr. Wyndham]

Originally Posted by Stig

Stop Talking.

The Mustang GT has NEVER EVER had a supercharger.
The Mustang GT is a 4.6L not a 4.8
You can never expect a 50% increase in power from just a supercharger....maybe a SC, tune, full exhaust, intake, and some cams.

You sure do talk alot of shit for someone who has no clue what engine will be in the New Camaro OR the new Mustang....

:eek:Oooh. Okay now I have to respond...thinking...thinking, hang on this has to be good....gotta number these too...Right, got it:



Issue #1

The Mustang GT has NEVER EVER had a supercharger.

I never said the Mustang GT had a supercharger, If you take the few seconds needed to read back a few posts, I was advocating that it didn't! I was said what I said in response to a post about an Aftermarket supercharger. Again...reading back a few posts helps


Issue #2

The Mustang GT is a 4.6L not a 4.8

Thank you for pointing that out. Since .2 Liters is a legitimant amount to argue over, I bow in submission, a slip of my finger, apparently. I like to keep tabs on pitiful rivals, so I knew it had a 4.6...Very, Very sorry, sir.

Issue #3

You can never expect a 50% increase in power from just a supercharger....maybe a SC, tune, full exhaust, intake, and some cams.

As I am more comfortable speaking about centrifugals, I will rebut this claim. I have seen many centrifugal supercharger systems - With Very minimal tuning - give a 50% gain in power...on average (again reading helps). This being the case for many different cars, I have provided a few links .

Whipple (twin-screw) on a Mustang? What? Where did he find that....
http://www.whipplesuperchargers.com/...sp?ProdID=1208

Power from tip in to redline, the new Whipple SC system makes over 40% power across the entire rpm range while maintaining industry leading drive-ability. The incredible HO system produces nearly 75% more power across the entire rpm range!

Vortech Centrifugal on another Mustang, damn Where Am I finding this stuff?http://www.vortechsuperchargers.com/...=94&cat_key=11

High Output Supercharging Systems:
The increased boost level, high output supercharger system, features a fully integrated air to water aftercooler approach to charge cooling. This system will increase horsepower from 300 to 462 and will increase torque from 320 lb./ft. to 419 lb./ft.

difference in HP: 162...(162/300) * 100 = 54%...whaaaa?

Vortech centrifugal on a 1998-2002 Camaro:
http://www.vortechsuperchargers.com/product.php?p=107&cat_key=12

High Output Supercharging Systems:
The increased boost level, high output supercharger system, features a fully integrated air to water charge cooler. This system will increase horsepower from 320 to 470 and will increase torque from 345 lb./ft. to 462 lb./ft.

Although it's only a 46%+/- increase...it still factors into the average

ProCharger on yet another Mustang GT:
http://www.procharger.com/gallery/sh...ket=1&idx=1315

Naturally Aspirated RWHP:
200

ProCharged RWHP:
657

I know that the N/A RWHP may be a little under-reported...but, it's a Mustang

And Finally (my fingers are getting tired of all this supporting-info-typing)
A Prochaged 2001 Camaro:
http://www.procharger.com/gallery/showtemp.php?market=2&idx=1137

Naturally Aspirated RWHP:
305 RWHP, 325 RWTQ

ProCharged RWHP:
458 RWHP, 415 RWTQ

and an exact 50% increase in RWHP...


Now, I'd hate to think that all of these companys are lying about their numbers...


Issue #4

You sure do talk alot of shit for someone who has no clue what engine will be in the New Camaro OR the new Mustang....

How does my shit look now? And as for me talking shit when I have "no idea what engine is going into the Camaro or Mustang"...Do you? I don't think anybody here is 100% sure which engine the Camaro is getting. And there are others who've said much worse than I have.

Next time, pick on somebody who hasn't done their homework. I NEVER say anything unless I have proof to back it up with. And I'm very proud of that.

BTW...my previous post, NOT this one, was a joke.....
So, to put it simply...I fully disagree with you Stig.