[Xanthos]

Originally Posted by stovt001

That's a really, really, really, really stupid argument. I like performance. I like driving. I love taking a car on mountain roads and pushing it to its limits. I like autocrossing, and I'd like to get some track time in too. I'm also 21, with an internship, student loans, dim job and income prospects for the next few years, and aware that gas prices are volatile. I drive a Cobalt right now, which is fantastically fuel efficient and insurance friendly. With a set of high performance tires it actually is some fun in the mountains, but I definitely want a true sporty car as an upgrade. So what you're saying is, just because insurance and fuel prices are somewhat of a concern to me, I shouldn't go for the best compromise, but instead go for one extreme or another? If you care about performance then why aren't you buying a Bugatti Veyron? If you're not springing for the most extreme example, then you should go for the lowest possible one right? Sorry for the politically incorrect language but that is simply retarded.

- Xanthos

P.S. - Although I was thinking of buying a four-door aveo or cobalt as a daily driver after I paid off the camaro.