Quote:
Originally Posted by radz28
I don't even care, but I don't think it'll be worse than CTS-V. I'm a little suprised that mileage suffers as much as the EPA numbers state. I have seen many comments and statements that people have made about improvements in mileage, but I take them with a little grain of salt. With the bypass valves and more efficient SCs out there, I'd suspect there shouldn't be much of a loss if driving conservatively, but I can't comment either way.
I just know it's not going to sway my decision.
|
I would have to think they're working their behind's off to get a reasonable rating. GT500 has escaped the guzzler tax this year...if they can't get that, I'm sure it'll be very close.
And....Camaro
IS slightly more aerodynamic than the CTS-V. But the Z may be getting super-wide tires (for a factory car, anyways)....so we'll see.