Quote:
Originally Posted by duder4thgen
I dont agree. Looks are subjective, and alot of people, me included, actually really liked the GTO. Fact of the matter is, GM followed the same exact formula with the GTO as they did the first time around- big engine in family car. The first GTO's were Tempest Lemans with a 389 shoved
under the hood and some badges slapped on. People now days just don't want to buy the sleeper look, so it failed.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by DntWrryBeHappy21
i really dont think that was necessary....
its good to see the competition is scared though =)
|
lol sorry
its just my opinion and i made liek was stating a fact or something i was just SOOOO mad when the GTO came out that is my 2nd fav. muscle car after the 'maro and i couldnt believe what they did to it it looks like an old grand am and i know Tempest Lemans with a 389 shoved
under the hood and some badges slapped on.but they still looked the same.
People now days just don't want to buy the sleeper look, so it failed.[/QUOTE]
i totally agree with you i actuall think sleepers are awsome but i still don't like teh GTO idk i just can't stand that that car bares the name GTO, and even thoug looks are subjective that car does not say muscle car
imagine how kool it wood be to have them do to teh GTO what they did to the Chally appearence wise ??