Quote:
Originally Posted by Mohrg Beast
know thy person you speak about before assuming..asumption is the mother of all phuckers. im the son of a man who can listen to a car driving down the street 100 yards away and tell me whats wrong with the car. They did make a 4 cyl camaro..it was first called a Cavalier..then it was called a Colbalt..anyway camaros have the stigma of being V8s and V6s only because that is what they are made for.and why people buy them.if they wanted a four cyl then theyd buy a smaller car with a 4 cyl.that way the car will actually go..thats why the build big cars for v8s. we hold our cars to heart. and we expect certain things out of our cars. for people that accept change thats fine. i love change. but certain changes destroy. its people that want to make smaller engines for bad ass cars for people like you who want the looks of a nice car with a pissy engine that destroyed the Nove..One of the greatest car ever made. Look at the 80s model when they made it a 4 banger for families..wheres the new novas again???
|
no what killed the nova II was making it a corrola and stupid reviews talking trash about the nova II and praising the toyota. . .
but what's the difference in someone taking a fiero GT and dropping a 2.4 l ecotec motor in it? going from a 6cyc to a 4 banger. . .but the hp rating is the same? hell even the 2.0 DI turbo ecotec would be good in that car.
point is if it's got the grunt then who cares about the number of cylinders. there's a reason there isn't a 4 banger in it now. . the lnf didn't have the grunt and couldn't push the car around with fuel efficiency that out did the 3.6l DI. the only reason they will put a 4 banger in this car is if it's fun to drive and gets better mileage. and the current ones can't do that so who knows what the next gen 4 bangers will hold.
btw give me a V8 in the camaro any day just as long as i has performance to match. but IF the new Z is a hopped up 6 cylinder that can handle like a wet dream, I'll take that.