View Single Post
Old 03-04-2016, 07:30 AM   #40
JakeW1990
 
JakeW1990's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro RS/2SS
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Huntsville, AL
Posts: 312
Quote:
Originally Posted by RupertPupkin View Post
DOPE!!! Thanks Jake. Hopefully its true, if it is, then im going to increase the CR to 11:1
If this is accurate, I can see cams that resemble FI (your others listed) valvetrain actions causing you to potentially lose a good bit of power if you remain NA and try to make big numbers off motor and/or spray AND terrible if you ever decide to go FI. Those cams being FI based won't save you from your .4 CR increase. You will be sadly disappointed on your curves and power. Just my 2 cents.

Furthermore, this clarifies why BTR Stage 4 is legitimate gains and why I laugh when I see "cam only" quote 490ish rwhp. I have E/Ts .3-.5 faster on 1/4 on cars with same mods boasting cam only and 485-490hp.
You can scroll down to the very bottom of the page to get you a quick answer.

http://www.lsxtv.com/tech-stories/en...our-comp-cams/
__________________
2010 Camaro 2SS/RS M6
12.08 @ 115 - 9/2015 (392hp/393tq) NA w/ Exhaust + Tune
11/2015 (464hp/439tq) ^ + BTR Stage 4 w/ Halltech CAI


Engine: BTR Stage 4 Cam; BTR Dual Spring Kit; C7R Chain; LS2 Tensioner; High Volume Oil Pump
Drivetrain: ACT T2S-G05 x2 Disc XT Street Kit
Exhaust: Kook's 1 7/8" Headers w/ Off-road pipes;Kook's 3" cat-back; QTP 3" cut-outs
Suspension: BMR 1.4" Front & 1.5" Rear Springs; Blackdog Solid Mounts w/ Poly Bushings
JakeW1990 is offline   Reply With Quote