Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Roto-Fab
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-16-2010, 10:26 PM   #1
Msthomp
 
Msthomp's Avatar
 
Drives: CGM 2010 SS on order
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 65
Question Potentially stupid question about *gasp* fuel economy

Okay...I have a 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS and I'm terribly bothered by my MPGs, but I like to try and keep it as low as possible so that my quick acceleration and need to have a little fun doesn't COMPLETELY devour all my fuel.

I'm not the biggest gear head, but I think I know a bit about how engines work, but would like some other opinions. I was reading on a website that "most cars" reach optimum fuel efficiency at around 55 and then it starts to drop after about 60 or 65. However, if the revs are low, shouldn't the driving be more fuel efficient than if they were high...regardless of speed?

I'll give you an example. On my drive to work there is a long, 2-lane road with a posted speed of 60 mph. If I do 60 mph in 5th, it's at about 2100 rpm...if I shift up, it's tough to keep it at 60 because the revs are so low, the car just wants to die, so I generally will shift up to 6th and stay at about 65 or 67 mph...then the revs are usually at 15-1800 rpm. Is this practice saving or wasting fuel?

Also, the friend who taught me to drive stick told me that whenever possible, he'll just push his clutch in and coast if he can. I'm in the hill country and can sometimes coast at speed for quite a long way, so...if putting in the clutch, letting the revs drop, and just coasting a good way to save fuel or is that wasteful?

Like I said in the title...this is probably a stupid question, but I don't know as much about engines as I probably should and was curious about the answer.
__________________
2010 2SS/RS M6 CGM - VIN 2G1FT1EW4A9187604

"I'm a boy who appreciates a good body, regardless of the make."

Msthomp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2010, 10:35 PM   #2
Mr. Wyndham
I used to be Dragoneye...
 
Mr. Wyndham's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 ZL1 1LE
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 31,873
Send a message via AIM to Mr. Wyndham
Quote:
Originally Posted by Msthomp View Post
I'm not the biggest gear head, but I think I know a bit about how engines work, but would like some other opinions. I was reading on a website that "most cars" reach optimum fuel efficiency at around 55 and then it starts to drop after about 60 or 65. However, if the revs are low, shouldn't the driving be more fuel efficient than if they were high...regardless of speed?
Little things like temperature and load can impact fuel economy, too...but in general -- you're absolutely right!

I'll give you an example. On my drive to work there is a long, 2-lane road with a posted speed of 60 mph. If I do 60 mph in 5th, it's at about 2100 rpm...if I shift up, it's tough to keep it at 60 because the revs are so low, the car just wants to die, so I generally will shift up to 6th and stay at about 65 or 67 mph...then the revs are usually at 15-1800 rpm. Is this practice saving or wasting fuel?
You're just wasting some fuel economy. You should be able to shift into 6th with an SS at 45 and have enough grunt to get you around...no reason to stay in 5th at 60mph. There should be plenty of passing power...just not ton of emergency power, so keep that in mind.

Also, the friend who taught me to drive stick told me that whenever possible, he'll just push his clutch in and coast if he can. I'm in the hill country and can sometimes coast at speed for quite a long way, so...if putting in the clutch, letting the revs drop, and just coasting a good way to save fuel or is that wasteful?
If you keep the clutch engaged and coast, the computer will sense that the throttle is closed, and cut fuel to near-idle levels, anyways...some suggest the engine employs a deceleration fuel cut-off to completely stop gas consumption...but I haven't looked into it personally....the only problem you would run into with holding the clutch in is not having power in case you need it. (when moving, it's always a good idea to stay engaged in case an emergency maneuver is required)

Like I said in the title...this is probably a stupid question, but I don't know as much about engines as I probably should and was curious about the answer.
I'm no expert either...just some things I've been taught over time that seems to make sense. Everyone has their own little 'methods'...you just have to play around with each tank of gas....figure out what works best.
__________________
"Keep the faith." - Fbodfather
Mr. Wyndham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2010, 10:36 PM   #3
Ronn

 
Ronn's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Northern Ontario
Posts: 1,181
Quote:
Originally Posted by Msthomp View Post
Okay...I have a 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS and I'm terribly bothered by my MPGs, but I like to try and keep it as low as possible so that my quick acceleration and need to have a little fun doesn't COMPLETELY devour all my fuel.

I'm not the biggest gear head, but I think I know a bit about how engines work, but would like some other opinions. I was reading on a website that "most cars" reach optimum fuel efficiency at around 55 and then it starts to drop after about 60 or 65. However, if the revs are low, shouldn't the driving be more fuel efficient than if they were high...regardless of speed?

I'll give you an example. On my drive to work there is a long, 2-lane road with a posted speed of 60 mph. If I do 60 mph in 5th, it's at about 2100 rpm...if I shift up, it's tough to keep it at 60 because the revs are so low, the car just wants to die, so I generally will shift up to 6th and stay at about 65 or 67 mph...then the revs are usually at 15-1800 rpm. Is this practice saving or wasting fuel?

Also, the friend who taught me to drive stick told me that whenever possible, he'll just push his clutch in and coast if he can. I'm in the hill country and can sometimes coast at speed for quite a long way, so...if putting in the clutch, letting the revs drop, and just coasting a good way to save fuel or is that wasteful?

Like I said in the title...this is probably a stupid question, but I don't know as much about engines as I probably should and was curious about the answer.
When you go faster things like wind resistance come into play. The amount of energy needed to move your car etc. It's physics which I wasn't very good at. I've noticed with mine when cruising as long as the rpm's are below 1800 I'm getting decent fuel mileage on the highway. I would probably go faster myself and keep the rpm's lower in 6th. Try your mpg meter on the DIC. Reset it and drive for a bit both ways and see what the car says.

As for pushing in the clutch, that's not a good idea, you should never coast in neutral. It's actually wasteful too, the car has a fuel shutoff when decelerating. I just can't remember what it's called.
__________________
1SS / RS / M6 / IOM / Black rally stripes / Polished wheels

It's a high school prom, it's a Springsteen song, it's a ride in a Chevrolet...
Ronn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2010, 10:37 PM   #4
Msthomp
 
Msthomp's Avatar
 
Drives: CGM 2010 SS on order
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 65
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dragoneye View Post
I'm no expert either...just some things I've been taught over time that seems to make sense. Everyone has their own little 'methods'...you just have to play around with each tank of gas....figure out what works best.
Thanks -- I know what you mean about the "emergency maneuvers", but I always shift to match my speed even when I'm coasting, so if something arises, I just have to hit the gas, let off the clutch and GO!
__________________
2010 2SS/RS M6 CGM - VIN 2G1FT1EW4A9187604

"I'm a boy who appreciates a good body, regardless of the make."

Msthomp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2010, 10:38 PM   #5
Msthomp
 
Msthomp's Avatar
 
Drives: CGM 2010 SS on order
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 65
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ronn View Post
When you go faster things like wind resistance come into play. The amount of energy needed to move your car etc. It's physics which I wasn't very good at. I've noticed with mine when cruising as long as the rpm's are below 1800 I'm getting decent fuel mileage on the highway. I would probably go faster myself and keep the rpm's lower in 6th. Try your mpg meter on the DIC. Reset it and drive for a bit both ways and see what the car says.

As for pushing in the clutch, that's not a good idea, you should never coast in neutral. It's actually wasteful too, the car has a fuel shutoff when decelerating. I just can't remember what it's called.
I use the mpg meter all the time...until I hit school traffic a few weeks ago, I was getting close to 18 mpg in town, so that's not bad, I guess.
__________________
2010 2SS/RS M6 CGM - VIN 2G1FT1EW4A9187604

"I'm a boy who appreciates a good body, regardless of the make."

Msthomp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2010, 10:52 PM   #6
Kurushio
 
Kurushio's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 CGM 1LT RS (M6)
Join Date: May 2010
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 703
I wouldnt hold in the clutch all the time. At a stop light if i know that its going to be a minute i will just put it in neutral and when i see the other lights go red i will get ready to go again. The lower the RPM's while cruising will mean better MPG so if you can cruise in 6th at all possible then you should. Even in my V6 i no problems going as low as about 40mph in 6th but of course there wont be much power but its MPG your after.
Kurushio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2010, 12:51 AM   #7
76z28
 
76z28's Avatar
 
Drives: 1976 camaro
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: bakersfield
Posts: 472
well one thing is when you are at lower rpms compression isnt doing its job as efficiently, so sometimes a little higher rev will get you better mileage because the engine is working more efficiency
the more you coast the better your mileage will be as my moms camery hybrid...if i dont coast i only get 33 if i do...a great 40 and its a blast to drive surprisingly
76z28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2010, 02:57 AM   #8
proj3ktpat
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2ss/rs
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 67
I live in san antonio and I use 6th gear for 55mph and up with no problems. I can even go up hills just fine. I have found that as long as i keep the rpms at about 1200 and above the engine doesn't lug or anything. Granted there isn't much power there, but if you're just cruising it should be fine. 18mpg for city/highway combined driving is actually pretty good, and you really can't expect much more without really babying it. These cars are epa rated at 16/24 city/highway. I have found that 65 in 6th gear seems to get really good gas mileage for me, and i can exceed that 24mpg mark doing so(according to the DIC). Coasting as much as possible is always a good option, and yes it does save fuel compared to staying on the pedal until you have to stop.
proj3ktpat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2010, 06:53 AM   #9
ketel0ne

 
Drives: Used to have 2010 SGM
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Charles Town, WV
Posts: 1,314
http://www.cleanmpg.com/forums/showthread.php?t=1510

Hypermiling can be done in any car.
ketel0ne is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2010, 07:30 AM   #10
h2oplay
Winners find a way
 
h2oplay's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2LT/RS M6
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: NE Ohio
Posts: 1,137
disconnect 2 of the spark plugs
h2oplay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2010, 08:13 AM   #11
usa1camaro1969
Back on the dino-juice
 
usa1camaro1969's Avatar
 
Drives: '10 LS + a few more
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Texas
Posts: 1,641
Coasting is not wasteful. I personally don't like the idea of pressing and holding the clutch in for any length of time, so I will pull it out of gear.

Traveling at lower rpms will get better mileage than higher rpms in every case.

Attempt to avoid the stop/starts whenever possible. It takes more fuel to get the 3800+ pound vehicle moving from a dead stop than if it's already moving as slow as 2mph. When you do have to start from a dead stop, attempt to gradually get in it(which may seem hard, since these are what they are).
__________________
I wake up in the morning and I piss excellence.
-Ricky Bobby
America is all about speed. Hot, nasty, badass speed. -Eleanor Roosevelt, 1936
usa1camaro1969 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2010, 08:27 AM   #12
stray bullitt

 
Drives: Bentley Continental GT.
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Boston, Lincolnshire, England
Posts: 1,022
Msthomp: Forgive my impertinance, but why would anyone worried about fuel economy buy a 6.2 litre engined vehicle?
P.S. I love coming over to the 'states, your gas is soooo cheap. UK = $8.00/ gallon.
stray bullitt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2010, 10:22 AM   #13
chevyman57
 
Drives: 2011 2SS RS
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Arkansas
Posts: 66
MPG?

I think that everyone with an SS faces some of the same problems. I have have had a 2010 2SS A6 and you don't have all of the chances to save gas like you do with a stick. It is almost limited to driving like your grandma. I have found with my 2011 2SS with a stick, I can do many more things to improve or have more control over the MPG. Keeping it in sixth gear, coasting and put it in neutral and disengage the clutch at stop lights and all of the things previously mentioned help. Remember you bought a SS Camaro and gas mileage probably didn't play a part in your purchase. I just drive and enjoy it and worry about the MPG maybe 1% of the time.
chevyman57 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-17-2010, 10:31 AM   #14
CamaroFemme

 
CamaroFemme's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Black Camaro 2SS/RS
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 1,880
I hear a cold air intake and a tune increases mpg.

*halo*
__________________
--
My boyfriend don't mind it.
CamaroFemme is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Tags
fuel economy, rpm range, saving gas


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Late 3rd Gen Fuel Economy VenomZ302 3rd Generation Camaros 10 10-21-2010 11:53 PM
Check engine light on Boricua Camaro Issues / Problems | Warranty Discussions | TSB and Recalls 4 08-28-2010 02:12 AM
changing injectors, how does my dash display calculate fuel economy general23cmp Tuning / Diagnostics -- engine and transmission 9 12-03-2009 09:24 AM
Why i think you cant do a Dyno in the same day 2SSRS@Gen5diy Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 123 10-22-2009 08:37 PM
New Job Openings at GM (Fuel Economy Research) TAG UR IT General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 3 04-14-2007 12:18 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:48 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.