Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Phastek Performance
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 01-14-2009, 02:59 PM   #1
chevydude26

 
chevydude26's Avatar
 
Drives: Future 2011 camaro convertible
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,256
How much do regulations affect the transition from concept to production??

I always hate when car companies show a concept and by the time the car comes out it looks like every other car out there in terms of the shape size and contour's of it...

Which regulations are the cause of this happening where all the cars tend to have a cookie cutter look to them and they all seem to share similar dimensions

while the camaro is great looking and all it lose some of its sleekness in the transition and looked a little more bloated

same thing happened to the mustang concept of 05...production ended up looking bloated

i'm assuming these changes have to do with regulations that companies have to abide by...which ones in particular cause these changes???
__________________
I think i flip flopped on the ss bumper...it looks good man...it really does
chevydude26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2009, 05:08 PM   #2
bolteon593

 
Drives: 2011 GT500
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: southern california
Posts: 902
100 bucks says you wouldnt know the differece between the concept and the production car driving past you from a standstill.
bolteon593 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2009, 06:18 PM   #3
chevydude26

 
chevydude26's Avatar
 
Drives: Future 2011 camaro convertible
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,256
Quote:
Originally Posted by bolteon593 View Post
100 bucks says you wouldnt know the differece between the concept and the production car driving past you from a standstill.
i can see the difference in the pics though...the length and height don't seem the same...

the concept has a coke bottle shape and the front end seems symmetrical...i mean on the ss they butchered the front end where its just too bulky compared to where it was before









and in these links lie an early production where it still looks good

http://images.google.com/imgres?imgu...3DroZ%26sa%3DN

and this is the ss where the front has just been massacred into a hulking mass

http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=11698
__________________
I think i flip flopped on the ss bumper...it looks good man...it really does
chevydude26 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2009, 06:22 PM   #4
SilverTurtle
Reality Check Specialist
 
SilverTurtle's Avatar
 
Drives: '02 Z28, 2012 45th SS
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: ATX
Posts: 1,730
Send a message via AIM to SilverTurtle Send a message via Yahoo to SilverTurtle
Quote:
Originally Posted by bolteon593 View Post
100 bucks says you wouldnt know the differece between the concept and the production car driving past you from a standstill.
agreed... this car is VERY similar to the Concept in person... you'll have to see it to believe it.

that said, there were a ton of regulations that had to be met to make the transition from Concept to production car... crash safety standards, lighting regulations, side impact and airbag standards... it all takes up space and adds weight... its just that simple.
__________________
got tequila?
SilverTurtle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2009, 08:56 PM   #5
1967rsss
 
Drives: 67, 68, 88, 98, 10, 12 ZL1 Camaros
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: nj
Posts: 103
The biggest difference that I know of, is the addition of a B pillar?

The pillar added at the rear of the door. This is for roll over stability.

The concept can roll down both side windows with pillar in the way. This was true to the original camaro. It's a shame it has to be there. I know the designers would have liked to keep it out.
1967rsss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2009, 08:59 PM   #6
Inspector 17
I love crepes
 
Inspector 17's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 ZL1 NGM A10
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Maryland
Posts: 4,955
Well, I think that GM has done possibly the best job in history matching the production car to the concept. As others have said, there are a ton of regulations that force the minor changes. Certainly crash testing and safety standards have the biggest impact. But beyond that, GM has to look at what they can actually sell and what is economically feasible to build. That may have as much impact on the final design as the regulations. If you can't mass produce a car and make money, the regulations don't matter.
Inspector 17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2009, 10:18 PM   #7
Mr. Wyndham
I used to be Dragoneye...
 
Mr. Wyndham's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 ZL1 1LE
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 31,873
Send a message via AIM to Mr. Wyndham
Let's not start this again...


The ONLY thing you have to understand is that they call them "Concepts" for a reason: They aren't production. Meaning they have tons (like Turtle said) of regs to go through and validate the car. NEVER expect any concept car to translate directly to the showroom. But occasionally; you'll get one like the Camaro....that does.
Attached Images
 
__________________
"Keep the faith." - Fbodfather
Mr. Wyndham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2009, 10:23 PM   #8
bolteon593

 
Drives: 2011 GT500
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: southern california
Posts: 902
Quote:
Originally Posted by chevydude26 View Post
i can see the difference in the pics though...the length and height don't seem the same...

the concept has a coke bottle shape and the front end seems symmetrical...i mean on the ss they butchered the front end where its just too bulky compared to where it was before









and in these links lie an early production where it still looks good

http://images.google.com/imgres?imgu...3DroZ%26sa%3DN

and this is the ss where the front has just been massacred into a hulking mass

http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=11698
what your sighting is camera differences, mainly focal length...


i've overlaid the cad data from one to the other, you'd be very very surprised how close they are to one another.
bolteon593 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2009, 10:28 PM   #9
UCF w00t
Geek
 
UCF w00t's Avatar
 
Drives: IOM 2010 Camaro 2SS
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Orlando
Posts: 4,451
I'm not sure the biggest thing affecting concept > production is really regulations. Yea, it's fun to blame the government but in this sitation is usually cost. They usually end up digging into the parts bin in order to reuse existing stuff as well ditching things in body paneling that are difficult to manufacture.

That being said, I don't think I've ever seen a production car remain so true to a concept.
UCF w00t is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-15-2009, 12:16 AM   #10
ArcAngel


 
ArcAngel's Avatar
 
Drives: 07 Black Cobalt SS/SC
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Manalapan-NJ
Posts: 2,872
Send a message via AIM to ArcAngel
production version actually looks better than the concept
__________________
Through HIM you believe in GOD, who raised HIM from the dead and Glorified him..
ArcAngel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2009, 12:33 PM   #11
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,366
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Quote:
Originally Posted by UCF w00t View Post
I'm not sure the biggest thing affecting concept > production is really regulations. Yea, it's fun to blame the government but in this sitation is usually cost.
They could probably make a car that looks identical to the concept and meet all regulations. I'm sure there are a few things like lighting that are regulated and weren't on the concept. However, the cost would be extreme. Then there are also issues of practicality.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2009, 01:24 PM   #12
Supermans
Camaro & Stang Enthusiast
 
Supermans's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Mustang 5.0 in Kona Blue
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Miami
Posts: 4,729
Quote:
Originally Posted by DGthe3 View Post
They could probably make a car that looks identical to the concept and meet all regulations. I'm sure there are a few things like lighting that are regulated and weren't on the concept. However, the cost would be extreme. Then there are also issues of practicality.
I agree, they could have made the production look even closer, however at what cost. They could use all aluminum for the body as well and engine block and make the car more lightweight, however at what cost.. From the side, the production Camaro looks almost identical to the concept and it is true you could not tell them apart if they were driving by you at 70 MPH...
__________________
Bought my Camaro from Eric Hall(817) 421-7266
Supermans is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-17-2009, 01:52 PM   #13
Camaro Lives On
Force RECON
 
Drives: 2005 Saab 9-5 2.3T
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Terre Haute, IN
Posts: 1,687
Send a message via AIM to Camaro Lives On
Quote:
Originally Posted by chevydude26 View Post
I always hate when car companies show a concept and by the time the car comes out it looks like every other car out there in terms of the shape size and contour's of it...

Which regulations are the cause of this happening where all the cars tend to have a cookie cutter look to them and they all seem to share similar dimensions

while the camaro is great looking and all it lose some of its sleekness in the transition and looked a little more bloated

same thing happened to the mustang concept of 05...production ended up looking bloated

i'm assuming these changes have to do with regulations that companies have to abide by...which ones in particular cause these changes???
Are you really gonna start this again?!? This is like the 4th time that you have brought this up. For the price, this is as close to the concept as you you will get. This is a $30k sports car, not a $1mil concept car. The only ovbious differences are the rear bumper, and the b-pillar and the repostioned front turn signals. The SS had to have something to differentiate it from the V6, which explains that change. The roof had to be raise for head room. Other than that, they are dang near carbon copies. Please don't beat this horse to death again.

I'm sorry for the rant...
Camaro Lives On is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
GM memo to dealers Moose 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 41 02-04-2010 08:33 PM
2009 Chrysler 200C Concept Muscle Master General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 27 04-26-2009 07:03 PM
Answeres to questions I have stumbled on dieseldave24v 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 13 02-23-2009 07:56 PM
UPCOMING CAMARO IMPORTANT DATES CamaroScotty 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 125 01-11-2009 01:31 AM
4 SEMA CAMAROS finally unveiled by GM! (hi-res images & details) FenwickHockey65 Camaro Photos | Spyshots | Video | Media Gallery 237 11-03-2008 11:39 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:13 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.