![]() |
|
|
#1 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2SS w/ ZZ427 Package!! Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,699
|
Here is one to spark discussion
WHat would you all prefer....
![]() And what do you think would be more reliable over time? 1. A normally aspirated LS3, bored and stroked to 418c.i. All top of the line stuff, long tubes, goal of 600 rwhp or so. ![]() 2. A supercharged LS3, 408c.i. or stock c.i. built for boost with forged internals and crank. Build it and put say 10psi to it? Not sure what that HP would be, but maybe 750 or so... What do you all think. I am working on a Group Purchase for a supercharger system, but could also do it for a normally aspirated set up....Just dont really know what to do!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
junior member
Drives: Grand Am Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: canada
Posts: 534
|
I've always had a preference for N/A but that's just me, it just seems more in depth to do N/A tunes. It just seems to easy to do forced induction, I mean with enough cash anything is possible with FI, but with na it's more of an art getting all that you can out of an engine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2SS w/ ZZ427 Package!! Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,699
|
But what do you think would be the most reliable?
I would also think the N/A motor would be more fuel efficient....you are making the HP with less air since there is no forced induction. I am considering building a motor next winter, or I would buy a blower this spring, and maybe forge the internals next winter.... Can't really decide, but I must say it would be SICK to put down over 600 at the rear all motor!!! |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Not That sad..considering
Drives: Man Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: the part of washington the capital forgot about.
Posts: 3,745
|
on 10psi with a supercharger it would be real hard to get 750 hp, with a turbo maybe with amazing tuning that would be possible. I think really though there is no wrong way to go, im looking at an APS twin turbo
![]() thats on stock internals which after a while i will replace with forged goodies. but it shows the potential of the stock motor with a "little" boost.
__________________
Stop Whinging
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
junior member
Drives: Grand Am Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: canada
Posts: 534
|
Talk to WMholden, he's probably one of the best guys on here in regards to forced induction. Send him a private message if he doesn't see this thread he seems pretty amicable so he should be very helpful.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Big Orange
Drives: 2010 Chevrolet Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: May 2008
Location: Kent, WA
Posts: 1,169
|
I'm thinking I'll do the Cam swap and get the engine to 480 and be done with it. Today they shot down my dreams of a factory LS7 :( I was really hoping for a 1 off VIN.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Not That sad..considering
Drives: Man Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: the part of washington the capital forgot about.
Posts: 3,745
|
Quote:
sorry bro...
__________________
Stop Whinging
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() Drives: 2005 Pontiac GTO Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 306
|
The beauty of forced induction is that you can usually maintain decent fuel economy. A naturally aspirated motor with big displacement and high revs will send your fuel economy to crap and most likely make it more difficult to meet emissions. I don't even know if a FI car would meet those anyway.
As far as reliability goes, a built motor like that is likely going to be decently reliable. But with high hp applications, you're always going to be pushing the limits of reliability. And as much as I like driving naturally aspirated cars because of the linear torque curves, I would say for a daily driver, FI would be the way to go. If you want a lot of hp for the track and don't mind sacrificing drivability, go all motor. Last edited by MajorTom; 10-14-2008 at 01:22 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() Drives: 2005 Pontiac GTO Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 306
|
[QUOTE=ZZcamaro;157303]But what do you think would be the most reliable?
I would also think the N/A motor would be more fuel efficient....you are making the HP with less air since there is no forced induction. I am considering building a motor next winter, or I would buy a blower this spring, and maybe forge the internals next winter.... Can't really decide, but I must say it would be SICK to put down over 600 at the rear all motor[QUOTE] Didn't see your post til after I posted mine. No. A NA motor with big displacement and high hp would not be more fuel efficient. The motor is having to work harder to flow the same air. Which it would still have to flow lots of air to make good power. And modern superchargers are efficient at low rpm so there wouldn't be a lot of drag forcing your engine to work hard at low RPM. Not to mention that the cam that would be needed to make 600 hp at the wheels would be rough and make your car idle really crappy and possibly not even make great power off the line. Trust me. For high horsepower daily driven cars, FI is the way to go. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Warehouse 13 Survivor!!!!
|
All of the above are good points... but nothing says "get out of the way" like the sound of a SC
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
![]() Drives: '02 Impreza 2.5RS Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: N/A
Posts: 304
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2SS w/ ZZ427 Package!! Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,699
|
So it looks like you all suggest going for the supercharger...then building a good block for it over next winter?
I woudl think that should be very doable. I would build a block with all forged internals, the best rings I can get, ported heads, some type of headers....then I would up the boost. What compression ratio should I build for? 9:1 8.5:1?? At 10pse, what do you think my RWHP numbers could be? |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Okie doke
|
Ever since owning the 04 cobra .. I say build the engine and put some sort of boost to it
...Maybe not the highest HP numbers, but a built LS3 w/ a KB Sitting on top would put out some NASTY torque I'm sure .... Just plain FUN. Crowley
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2SS w/ ZZ427 Package!! Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 2,699
|
COme on give me some legit HP numbers you think that motor could do. I want this to be the ultimate daily driveable, untouchabe (for less than a ferrari!!) street monster!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Video: Discussion on American cars (Talks about the Camaro) | AirGoya | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 9 | 07-09-2008 01:53 AM |
| Production Engine Options Discussion | motorhed | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 13 | 05-27-2008 02:35 PM |
| *Spoilers*Transformers Discussion Thread*Spoilers* | Zyreal | Off-topic Discussions | 36 | 07-31-2007 02:03 AM |
| General discussion on the 2008-2009 camaro | BlacLac02 | Site Related Announcements / Suggestions / Feedback / Questions | 2 | 11-03-2006 05:15 PM |