Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Roto-Fab
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > Regional Forums > Canada


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-26-2010, 04:59 PM   #1
Matster

 
Matster's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS IOM/IOM #3625
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Greater Toronto Area
Posts: 1,902
Question Octane, whats what?

So I read some of the other threads a while back and didn't really have this question answered or perhaps didn't understand the the answer.

I am currently burning Sunoco's 94 which supposedly has 20% ethanol. I read that this effects the actual octane level of the fuel and that I'm probably not getting a true 94 because it doesn't burn the same as gasoline. If this is true, would I be better off burning Shells 91 Octane that does not have any ethanol?

My Sunoco is gone, being re-branded to Petro Canada, will now have two catty corner to each other at the same intersection.
__________________
666 EVIL RWHP BUILT AND TUNED BY SHIFTED PERCEPTIONS INC.(SPi)

416 Forged Stroker, E-Force Supercharger, Blower Cam, Rotofab CAI, Stainless Works 2" LT Headers and 3" Exhaust, LPE ZR1 Twin Disc Clutch, DSS 1400 HP Axles, Pfadt Performance Kit Stage 3.
Matster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2010, 05:03 PM   #2
fielderLS3


 
fielderLS3's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Mazda6, 2011 Mustang 5.0
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Portage, Wisconsin
Posts: 4,049
Burning ethanol has the effect of increasing octane, not decreasing it. If anything, the Sunoco 94 with 20% ethanol is probably 91 octane gas, and the ethanol raises the overall octane to 94.

Also, are you sure there is a 20% ethanol content? I don't think non E85 cars are rated to run on anything about 10%. (at least in the US, I'm not sure if things are different in Canada). If it were my car, I'd use gas with no ethanol anytime I can find it. A 20% blend may effect your warranty.
__________________
2022 1SS 1LE (Arrived 4/29/22)
"The car is the closest thing we will ever create to something that is alive."
. 2022 1SS 1LE (Coming Soon)
fielderLS3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2010, 05:24 PM   #3
Matster

 
Matster's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS IOM/IOM #3625
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Greater Toronto Area
Posts: 1,902
Quote:
Originally Posted by fielderLS3 View Post
Burning ethanol has the effect of increasing octane, not decreasing it. If anything, the Sunoco 94 with 20% ethanol is probably 91 octane gas, and the ethanol raises the overall octane to 94.

Also, are you sure there is a 20% ethanol content? I don't think non E85 cars are rated to run on anything about 10%. (at least in the US, I'm not sure if things are different in Canada). If it were my car, I'd use gas with no ethanol anytime I can find it. A 20% blend may effect your warranty.
Sorry you are right it is 10% ethanol added to 93 Octane.
__________________
666 EVIL RWHP BUILT AND TUNED BY SHIFTED PERCEPTIONS INC.(SPi)

416 Forged Stroker, E-Force Supercharger, Blower Cam, Rotofab CAI, Stainless Works 2" LT Headers and 3" Exhaust, LPE ZR1 Twin Disc Clutch, DSS 1400 HP Axles, Pfadt Performance Kit Stage 3.
Matster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2010, 08:28 PM   #4
Octaneman
 
Octaneman's Avatar
 
Drives: Camaro ZL1
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Calgary,AB
Posts: 227
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matster View Post
Sorry you are right it is 10% ethanol added to 93 Octane.
Its supposed to be 10% added to 91 octane, you will also consume more fuel as the motor see fuel by weight, and ethanol is 34% oxygenated.
Octaneman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2010, 08:46 PM   #5
Moonlight
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 51
I use petro-can 94. i believe it has 10% ethanol. its supposed to be somehow good for your engine. I wanted to get pure octane but there is just none around here. the next best is probably Shell 91 which does not even meet the requirement.
Moonlight is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2010, 09:30 PM   #6
CanadianCamaro

 
CanadianCamaro's Avatar
 
Drives: 2SS/RS IOM - A.K.A. DA ;)
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 2,046
Sunoco Ultra 94 / PC Ultra 94 (same thing) is "up to 10% ethanol by volume" I believe. Adding ethanol increases octane rating but as the ethanol content rises a larger volume is required to produce the same energy. I am not an engineer but I have heard no claims that ethanol burns and less (or more) cleaner than pure petroleum based fuel. The basic rule of thumb is higher octane fuels burn hotter and cleaner - period. So to answer your question I personally feel that you're best to stick with the 94.

Any gasoline engine will burn ethanol fuels including those with content higher than 10%. But of course their computers are not optimized to burn higher ethanol content fuels and as such fuel mixtures are not adjusted properly and as such can cause damage. Same concept as when I was a kid and accidentally filled the gas powered riding mower with diesel . It still ran, the problem was shutting it off!
__________________

"BBOMG - More than just a car show.... It's an experience!"
CanadianCamaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2010, 09:47 PM   #7
SQUALO


 
Drives: CHEVROLET
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: YKZ, CAN.
Posts: 4,258
To start I'm no engineer either, however, it's been said that ethonal burns cleaner for the environment, it's a renuable resource. However, it's been claimed that high content of ethonal fuels can break down engine parts over time. It's best to stick with fuels without ethonol; also read my posts(#28 & 29) in this other thread, which has a response I got from an e-mail to Petro Canada ( when they were on my good side).

http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showth...t=75204&page=2

I'm personally staying away from Petro Canada & Sunoco fuels.
SQUALO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2010, 11:08 PM   #8
Dave Wilson
 
Drives: Corvette/Camaro
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: B.C. Canada
Posts: 21
CORN FUEL

At the risk of bein' F o' S! I believe the 'up to 10% E' is just a marketing ploy by the E industry! They've produced a product the the P industry can help them market (green) and make them them both $$!. My old F 150 would run on overproof also! We are all being manipulated by mega corps! But hey, as long as it doesn't void yer warranty....right? A retailer friend has recently told me that 'E' will be the new kid on the block country wide and will undoubtably purvaid every octane level. Enjoy yer V8's while they last.
Dave Wilson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2010, 05:44 AM   #9
Rampant
 
Rampant's Avatar
 
Drives: 1999 Firebird Formula WS6 455ci LS7
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Burlington Ont.
Posts: 57
Not sure if everyone understands "Octane". It is in fact a knock intensity value. Or a value to rate its ability to with stand predetonation.

It is not an energy value. As some think it means more power. If you motor is designed for regular, you will get more power from regular!

What are higher octanes for? They are for higher compression motors so that you can make more power with the addition of compression, with out getting knock or predetonation while having a controlled burn.

So now that that is cleared up. We can discuss the different fuels out there. Ultra 94 does have ethanol in it. Ethanol has a lower energy content than typical gasoline which typically uses aromatics to boost its octane value. So as mentioned by others you need to use more of the 94 to get the same energy value or calorific value as the 91 Shell, but since you can bump your compression with the 94, you have a chance to make more hp with the 94. You are just going to use more of the 94 all the time for typical tooling around.

I use 94 in my LS7 as it has a compression of 11.4:1 and I feel safer with it. I might be able to tune it for 91 shell and run rich to cool the chamber to reduce the risk of detonation, but now I am going down another path. You can also run more aggressive timing with the higher octane. There is no magic bullet, you pick your poison.

If you run a much higher octane than needed, it will make less power and likely create deposits because the combustion will be incomplete, and make things even worse in the long run.

This is from memory and has been 25 years now since I took it in thermodynamics, but I do still mess around with it playin and tuning my toy.

Better technical details here.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octane_rating

We could also discuss E85 and its potential, but I leave that alone for now.
__________________
1999 Firebird Formula WS6 - 455ci LS7


Last edited by Rampant; 04-27-2010 at 05:59 AM.
Rampant is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2010, 08:41 AM   #10
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,366
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Octane used to refer to the amount of actual octane (C8H18) in gasoline. Octane was harder to ignite than the lighter hydrocarbons in gas (mainly heptane, C7H16). 91 octane would have contained 91% octane. As fuel had more and more additives, this method became less and less meaningful. So they went to a standardized octane rating system. This rates a fuel based on how hard it is to ignite, relative to 100 octane. By using ethanol or heavier hydorcarbons (like nonane, C9H20) it is possible to achieve octane ratings in excess of 100 (like race gas, for example) without any actual octane in the fuel. I won't complicate matters further by going into RON, MON, and AKI.

But the short version is, if it says 94 octane, it will have the same anti-knock capacity as any other 94 octane regardless of how it got that rating. It all gets taken into account.


Quote:
Originally Posted by CanadianCamaro View Post
Sunoco Ultra 94 / PC Ultra 94 (same thing) is "up to 10% ethanol by volume" I believe. Adding ethanol increases octane rating but as the ethanol content rises a larger volume is required to produce the same energy. I am not an engineer but I have heard no claims that ethanol burns and less (or more) cleaner than pure petroleum based fuel. The basic rule of thumb is higher octane fuels burn hotter and cleaner - period. So to answer your question I personally feel that you're best to stick with the 94.

Any gasoline engine will burn ethanol fuels including those with content higher than 10%. But of course their computers are not optimized to burn higher ethanol content fuels and as such fuel mixtures are not adjusted properly and as such can cause damage. Same concept as when I was a kid and accidentally filled the gas powered riding mower with diesel . It still ran, the problem was shutting it off!
You are right. But ethanol is more efficient when looking at the big picture. Few consumers think like that though. They see a ~3% drop when using E10 vs E0, the cost savings are only seen by the oil companies, unlike with E85 which can be significantly cheaper than regular gas. So for you and me, the fuel isn't cheaper and it doesn't go as far. Yet for Sunoco, the profit is higher and brings people back sooner. Wonder why they like it so much ...
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2010, 01:10 PM   #11
Matster

 
Matster's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS IOM/IOM #3625
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Greater Toronto Area
Posts: 1,902
Thanks everyone for the input, it has been really helpful. The main reason I was asking this is because I'm considering a tune and before doing so need to decide whether to stick with 94 or switch to 91. Will stick with the 94, this isn't my daily driver so a few extra bucks on a tank full isn't going to break me.
__________________
666 EVIL RWHP BUILT AND TUNED BY SHIFTED PERCEPTIONS INC.(SPi)

416 Forged Stroker, E-Force Supercharger, Blower Cam, Rotofab CAI, Stainless Works 2" LT Headers and 3" Exhaust, LPE ZR1 Twin Disc Clutch, DSS 1400 HP Axles, Pfadt Performance Kit Stage 3.
Matster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2010, 09:17 PM   #12
SQUALO


 
Drives: CHEVROLET
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: YKZ, CAN.
Posts: 4,258
Quote:
Originally Posted by Matster View Post
Thanks everyone for the input, it has been really helpful. The main reason I was asking this is because I'm considering a tune and before doing so need to decide whether to stick with 94 or switch to 91. Will stick with the 94, this isn't my daily driver so a few extra bucks on a tank full isn't going to break me.
Let us know how the tune goes.
SQUALO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2010, 04:10 AM   #13
StevenMarrocco
 
StevenMarrocco's Avatar
 
Drives: INFERNO ORANGE Camaro, 2LT RS.
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: CANADA
Posts: 106
sorry for being the new guy around the block, but can anyone recommend me what type of gas to put in my 6 banger!
Thanks in advanced!
StevenMarrocco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2010, 04:42 AM   #14
Sterling


 
Sterling's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 1LT/RS M6
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Fairhaven, MA
Posts: 5,882
Quote:
Originally Posted by StevenMarrocco View Post
sorry for being the new guy around the block, but can anyone recommend me what type of gas to put in my 6 banger!
Thanks in advanced!
A lot of us have been running the 93 octane since it was noticed that the knock sensors are more active using the 87 octane causing it to pull some of the timing. It will run fine on the 87 octane, but with the higher octane fuel it has a little more power. I can feel the difference when I'm short shifting... it won't bog down with the 93 like it will with the 87. The choice is really up to you.
Sterling is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Octane Ratings? Icefsh Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 12 03-10-2015 06:10 AM
Mixing Gas to get 93 Octane FarmallsForever Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 29 06-03-2013 07:19 PM
How to get 93 octane? BlownSS 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 3 03-23-2010 01:11 PM
Anyone running something other than 87? jeansonne627 Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 31 10-01-2009 03:40 PM
No 93 Octane in California tribone Mechanical Maintenance: Break-in / Oil & Fluids / Servicing 15 08-27-2009 05:18 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.