![]() |
|
|
#1 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 2SS/RS IOM/IOM #3625 Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Greater Toronto Area
Posts: 1,902
|
So I read some of the other threads a while back and didn't really have this question answered or perhaps didn't understand the the answer.
I am currently burning Sunoco's 94 which supposedly has 20% ethanol. I read that this effects the actual octane level of the fuel and that I'm probably not getting a true 94 because it doesn't burn the same as gasoline. If this is true, would I be better off burning Shells 91 Octane that does not have any ethanol? My Sunoco is gone, being re-branded to Petro Canada, will now have two catty corner to each other at the same intersection.
__________________
666 EVIL RWHP BUILT AND TUNED BY SHIFTED PERCEPTIONS INC.(SPi)
416 Forged Stroker, E-Force Supercharger, Blower Cam, Rotofab CAI, Stainless Works 2" LT Headers and 3" Exhaust, LPE ZR1 Twin Disc Clutch, DSS 1400 HP Axles, Pfadt Performance Kit Stage 3. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2016 Mazda6, 2011 Mustang 5.0 Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Portage, Wisconsin
Posts: 4,049
|
Burning ethanol has the effect of increasing octane, not decreasing it. If anything, the Sunoco 94 with 20% ethanol is probably 91 octane gas, and the ethanol raises the overall octane to 94.
Also, are you sure there is a 20% ethanol content? I don't think non E85 cars are rated to run on anything about 10%. (at least in the US, I'm not sure if things are different in Canada). If it were my car, I'd use gas with no ethanol anytime I can find it. A 20% blend may effect your warranty.
__________________
2022 1SS 1LE (Arrived 4/29/22)
"The car is the closest thing we will ever create to something that is alive." |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 2SS/RS IOM/IOM #3625 Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Greater Toronto Area
Posts: 1,902
|
Quote:
__________________
666 EVIL RWHP BUILT AND TUNED BY SHIFTED PERCEPTIONS INC.(SPi)
416 Forged Stroker, E-Force Supercharger, Blower Cam, Rotofab CAI, Stainless Works 2" LT Headers and 3" Exhaust, LPE ZR1 Twin Disc Clutch, DSS 1400 HP Axles, Pfadt Performance Kit Stage 3. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() Drives: Camaro ZL1 Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Calgary,AB
Posts: 227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 51
|
I use petro-can 94. i believe it has 10% ethanol. its supposed to be somehow good for your engine. I wanted to get pure octane but there is just none around here. the next best is probably Shell 91 which does not even meet the requirement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2SS/RS IOM - A.K.A. DA ;) Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Ontario Canada
Posts: 2,046
|
Sunoco Ultra 94 / PC Ultra 94 (same thing) is "up to 10% ethanol by volume" I believe. Adding ethanol increases octane rating but as the ethanol content rises a larger volume is required to produce the same energy. I am not an engineer but I have heard no claims that ethanol burns and less (or more) cleaner than pure petroleum based fuel. The basic rule of thumb is higher octane fuels burn hotter and cleaner - period. So to answer your question I personally feel that you're best to stick with the 94.
Any gasoline engine will burn ethanol fuels including those with content higher than 10%. But of course their computers are not optimized to burn higher ethanol content fuels and as such fuel mixtures are not adjusted properly and as such can cause damage. Same concept as when I was a kid and accidentally filled the gas powered riding mower with diesel . It still ran, the problem was shutting it off!
__________________
"BBOMG - More than just a car show.... It's an experience!" |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: CHEVROLET Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: YKZ, CAN.
Posts: 4,258
|
To start I'm no engineer either, however, it's been said that ethonal burns cleaner for the environment, it's a renuable resource. However, it's been claimed that high content of ethonal fuels can break down engine parts over time. It's best to stick with fuels without ethonol; also read my posts(#28 & 29) in this other thread, which has a response I got from an e-mail to Petro Canada (
when they were on my good side).http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showth...t=75204&page=2 I'm personally staying away from Petro Canada & Sunoco fuels. |
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() Drives: Corvette/Camaro Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: B.C. Canada
Posts: 21
|
CORN FUEL
At the risk of bein' F o' S! I believe the 'up to 10% E' is just a marketing ploy by the E industry! They've produced a product the the P industry can help them market (green) and make them them both $$!. My old F 150 would run on overproof also! We are all being manipulated by mega corps! But hey, as long as it doesn't void yer warranty....right? A retailer friend has recently told me that 'E' will be the new kid on the block country wide and will undoubtably purvaid every octane level. Enjoy yer V8's while they last.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() Drives: 1999 Firebird Formula WS6 455ci LS7 Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Burlington Ont.
Posts: 57
|
Not sure if everyone understands "Octane". It is in fact a knock intensity value. Or a value to rate its ability to with stand predetonation.
It is not an energy value. As some think it means more power. If you motor is designed for regular, you will get more power from regular! What are higher octanes for? They are for higher compression motors so that you can make more power with the addition of compression, with out getting knock or predetonation while having a controlled burn. So now that that is cleared up. We can discuss the different fuels out there. Ultra 94 does have ethanol in it. Ethanol has a lower energy content than typical gasoline which typically uses aromatics to boost its octane value. So as mentioned by others you need to use more of the 94 to get the same energy value or calorific value as the 91 Shell, but since you can bump your compression with the 94, you have a chance to make more hp with the 94. You are just going to use more of the 94 all the time for typical tooling around. I use 94 in my LS7 as it has a compression of 11.4:1 and I feel safer with it. I might be able to tune it for 91 shell and run rich to cool the chamber to reduce the risk of detonation, but now I am going down another path. You can also run more aggressive timing with the higher octane. There is no magic bullet, you pick your poison. If you run a much higher octane than needed, it will make less power and likely create deposits because the combustion will be incomplete, and make things even worse in the long run. This is from memory and has been 25 years now since I took it in thermodynamics, but I do still mess around with it playin and tuning my toy. Better technical details here. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Octane_rating We could also discuss E85 and its potential, but I leave that alone for now.
__________________
1999 Firebird Formula WS6 - 455ci LS7
Last edited by Rampant; 04-27-2010 at 05:59 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Moderator.ca
|
Octane used to refer to the amount of actual octane (C8H18) in gasoline. Octane was harder to ignite than the lighter hydrocarbons in gas (mainly heptane, C7H16). 91 octane would have contained 91% octane. As fuel had more and more additives, this method became less and less meaningful. So they went to a standardized octane rating system. This rates a fuel based on how hard it is to ignite, relative to 100 octane. By using ethanol or heavier hydorcarbons (like nonane, C9H20) it is possible to achieve octane ratings in excess of 100 (like race gas, for example) without any actual octane in the fuel. I won't complicate matters further by going into RON, MON, and AKI.
But the short version is, if it says 94 octane, it will have the same anti-knock capacity as any other 94 octane regardless of how it got that rating. It all gets taken into account. Quote:
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________ Originally Posted by FbodFather My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors...... ........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!__________________ Camaro Fest sub-forum |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 2SS/RS IOM/IOM #3625 Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Greater Toronto Area
Posts: 1,902
|
Thanks everyone for the input, it has been really helpful. The main reason I was asking this is because I'm considering a tune and before doing so need to decide whether to stick with 94 or switch to 91. Will stick with the 94, this isn't my daily driver so a few extra bucks on a tank full isn't going to break me.
__________________
666 EVIL RWHP BUILT AND TUNED BY SHIFTED PERCEPTIONS INC.(SPi)
416 Forged Stroker, E-Force Supercharger, Blower Cam, Rotofab CAI, Stainless Works 2" LT Headers and 3" Exhaust, LPE ZR1 Twin Disc Clutch, DSS 1400 HP Axles, Pfadt Performance Kit Stage 3. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: CHEVROLET Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: YKZ, CAN.
Posts: 4,258
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
![]() Drives: INFERNO ORANGE Camaro, 2LT RS. Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: CANADA
Posts: 106
|
sorry for being the new guy around the block, but can anyone recommend me what type of gas to put in my 6 banger!
Thanks in advanced! |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro 1LT/RS M6 Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Fairhaven, MA
Posts: 5,882
|
A lot of us have been running the 93 octane since it was noticed that the knock sensors are more active using the 87 octane causing it to pull some of the timing. It will run fine on the 87 octane, but with the higher octane fuel it has a little more power. I can feel the difference when I'm short shifting... it won't bog down with the 93 like it will with the 87. The choice is really up to you.
__________________
Trifecta tune, Vararam Intake, VMAX throttle body and manifold insulator, RxPerformance Catch Can, , MRT v1.0 and Louvers, Barton shifter, BMR strut tower brace, RED dome light and Plasma LED DRL's, fieldgoal00's Halo 1 harness, hood spears/side stripes, rain guards, custom bowtie, Team LLT badges, headlight and foglight covers, taillight and side marker covers, backup light covers, WeatherTech floormats
|
|
|
|
![]() |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Octane Ratings? | Icefsh | Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 12 | 03-10-2015 06:10 AM |
| Mixing Gas to get 93 Octane | FarmallsForever | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 29 | 06-03-2013 07:19 PM |
| How to get 93 octane? | BlownSS | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 3 | 03-23-2010 01:11 PM |
| Anyone running something other than 87? | jeansonne627 | Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 31 | 10-01-2009 03:40 PM |
| No 93 Octane in California | tribone | Mechanical Maintenance: Break-in / Oil & Fluids / Servicing | 15 | 08-27-2009 05:18 PM |