ANOTHER IMPRESSIVE VORTECH SET UP

[JANNETTYRACING]

This is an LS3 with Dynatech headers and cats, Corsa Cat back, Vortech V3 SI trim supercharger system with a pulley upgrade and Jannetty Racing Tuning, 9.6 PSI boost, 13.5 degrees timing and 10.9 A/F on 50/50 mix of 93 and 110 race fuel.

618 RWHP 548 RWTQ.

[SonnyakaPig]

That's a really beautiful torque curve. Great job on that set up. Is this set up with the Jannetty fuel system that you were working on? Do you have a video of the dyno? I'm only asking because I would love to hear how the car sounds with the Vortech SC, Dynatech headers and corsa exhaust? Either way, I'm sure it sounds great.

[Camaro21]

Wow !!! Those are impressive numbers.. Pics of the Build??

[JANNETTYRACING]

This one is getting an MSD fuel pump voltage booster for now since this is as far as the customer wants to go for now, atleast until he gets used to it.

Then back on the dyno for fine tuning.

My Camera Crapped out again I am going to buy a new one tonight and we take some pics and post them but it is nothing fancy, Satin unit in an otherwise stock engine compartment.

Just all Business.

Ted.

[SonnyakaPig]

Originally Posted by JANNETTYRACING

This one is getting an MSD fuel pump voltage booster for now since this is as far as the customer wants to go for now, atleast until he gets used to it.

Then back on the dyno for fine tuning.

My Camera Crapped out again I am going to buy a new one tonight and we take some pics and post them but it is nothing fancy, Satin unit in an otherwise stock engine compartment.

Just all Business.

Ted.

Ahem... Vortech is always fancy business.

Just playin.

[Brian@Vortech]

Yes! Awesome Ted...keep pumping out those fantastic Vortech builds. Your customer must be ecstatic! Did he pee himself a little when you took him for his first test drive?

[Gotthat02fire]

Nice numbers!!!!!!

[bad2000z]

Amazing. You guys are bad ass.

[2010 SSRS]

wow, what does something like this go for?
That is awesome, I have an L99 though.

[mtcwby]

Originally Posted by JANNETTYRACING

This is an LS3 with Dynatech headers and cats, Corsa Cat back, Vortech V3 SI trim supercharger system with a pulley upgrade and Jannetty Racing Tuning, 9.6 PSI boost, 13.5 degrees timing and 10.9 A/F on 93 octane fuel.

618 RWHP 548 RWTQ.

I just don't get it, Ted. You scream BS on my 631 RWHP when RMCR did my Vortech with nearly identical build. WTF. I think you just finally figured out how to do it, to get the power that RMCR got on their first 2010 Camaro Vortech build.

[JANNETTYRACING]

Originally Posted by mtcwby

I just don't get it, Ted. You scream BS on my 631 RWHP when RMCR did my Vortech with nearly identical build. WTF. I think you just finally figured out how to do it, to get the power that RMCR got on their first 2010 Camaro Vortech build.

First I Never Screamed BS, I politly asked questions and was ignored.

And NO, It took nearly 10 PSI on 50/50 mix of 93/110 octane to make 618 NOT 7.5 on 91 octane to make 631

I Stand by my Statement.

I have no interest in arguing or disrespecting anyone, RMCR Mike and I had a Nice conversation pertaining to this subject and he agreed there may be something ary with his Baro sensor, which Dynojet Admitted Clearly they have a 10% acceptable ERROR range for they're product.

Superflow has a less than 1% accpetable error range.

Thank you for chiming in.

Ted.

[mtcwby]

Originally Posted by JANNETTYRACING

First I Never Screamed BS, I politly asked questions and was ignored.

And NO, It took nearly 10 PSI on 93 octane to make 618 NOT 7.5 on 91 octane to make 631

I Stand by my Statement.

I have no interest in arguing or disrespecting anyone, RMCR Mike and I had a Nice conversation pertaining to this subject and he agreed there may be something ary with his Baro sensor, which Dynojet Admitted Clearly they have a 10% acceptable ERROR range for they're product.

Superflow has a less than 1% accpetable error range.

Thank you for chiming in.

Ted.

Well Ted Almighty Tuner, My Vortech puts out 9.5 psi on the guage when I took my car to sea level. So, I know for a fact that we do lose a couple psi of boost at Colorado Springs, compared to sea level. So, may I ask what size pulley are you using on this setup?
I'm pretty sure you are using the same size as I am, so that obviously proves that we lose that much boost at this altitude. So if we are using the same size pulley, then we are putting out the same boost, right?? Then what you are saying about there not being as much loss at 6400 ft is obviously not correct. We do get that much loss.
There's no way you can argue any further. This proves it. The car in this thread and my car are set up nearly identically. If you set up the timing on this car to 16 degrees advance and 11.8 AFR (like I am tuned), you will see nearly the same HP as I am getting.

[Will@Apf]

Ted, great #'s man...



mtcwby, on 91 i would think thats a little high, eather way i bet its bad a$$ ..good luck to you and nice looking car...

[racerx333]

91 octane at altitude is the same as 93 at sea level